IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i12p1286-d1679021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Carbon Sink Responses to Multi-Scenario Land Use Changes in the Dianchi Lake Basin: An Integrated PLUS-InVEST Model Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenheng Gao

    (Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
    GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Quanli Xu

    (Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
    GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Shu Wang

    (Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
    GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Qihong Ren

    (Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
    GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Youyou Li

    (Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
    GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Educational Ministry, Kunming 650500, China)

Abstract

Land use and land cover changes are critical drivers of terrestrial carbon stock dynamics, as they alter native vegetation and land-based production activities. Scenario-based simulation of land use and carbon stock evolution offer valuable insights into the carbon sink potential of different development strategies and support low-carbon land planning. We focus on the Dianchi Basin, integrating a Markov-PLUS land use simulation with the InVEST carbon assessment model to examine carbon stock changes from 2000 to 2030 under three scenarios: natural development and cropland and ecological protections. Results indicate that from 2000 to 2020, the region experienced significant urbanization, with cropland decreasing and forest land expanding. Forests contributed the most to the total carbon storage, followed by cropland. The total carbon stock initially increased but experienced a marked decline from 2010 to 2020, aa trend expected to continue, largely attributable to the transformation of cropland and grassland into construction land, as well as the conversion of forest into cropland. By 2030, carbon stock trajectories would vary across scenarios. Both the natural development and cropland protection scenarios resulted in carbon loss, whereas the ecological protection scenario increased carbon storage and reversed the declining trend. Spatially, carbon stock distribution in the basin exhibits strong heterogeneity, with higher values in the periphery and lower values in the urban center. We reveal the spatio-temporal characteristics of carbon stock change and the carbon consequences of land use policies, providing scientific evidence to support land use restructuring, carbon sink enhancement, and regional carbon emission reduction under the dual-carbon goals of China.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenheng Gao & Quanli Xu & Shu Wang & Qihong Ren & Youyou Li, 2025. "Evaluating Carbon Sink Responses to Multi-Scenario Land Use Changes in the Dianchi Lake Basin: An Integrated PLUS-InVEST Model Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:1286-:d:1679021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R White & G Engelen, 1993. "Cellular Automata and Fractal Urban Form: A Cellular Modelling Approach to the Evolution of Urban Land-Use Patterns," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(8), pages 1175-1199, August.
    2. Xudong Li & Chuanrong Li & Shouchao Yu & Lijuan Cheng & Dan Li & Jiehui Wang & Hongxia Zhao, 2024. "Dynamic Simulation of Land Use Change and Assessment of Carbon Storage Based on the PLUS Model: A Case Study of the Most Livable City, Weihai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Hualou Long & Xiangbin Kong & Shougeng Hu & Yurui Li, 2021. "Land Use Transitions under Rapid Urbanization: A Perspective from Developing China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-9, September.
    4. Nematollah Kohestani & Shafagh Rastgar & Ghodratolla Heydari & Shaban Shataee Jouibary & Hamid Amirnejad, 2024. "Spatiotemporal modeling of the value of carbon sequestration under changing land use/land cover using InVEST model: a case study of Nour-rud Watershed, Northern Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 14477-14505, June.
    5. Hui Fu & Yaowen Liang & Jie Chen & Ling Zhu & Guang Fu, 2024. "A New Framework of Land Use Simulation for Land Use Benefit Optimization Based on GMOP-PLUS Model—A Case Study of Haikou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José I Barredo & Luca Demicheli & Carlo Lavalle & Marjo Kasanko & Niall McCormick, 2004. "Modelling Future Urban Scenarios in Developing Countries: An Application Case Study in Lagos, Nigeria," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(1), pages 65-84, February.
    2. Caruso, Geoffrey & Peeters, Dominique & Cavailhes, Jean & Rounsevell, Mark, 2007. "Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata-based microeconomic model," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 542-567, September.
    3. C J Webster & F Wu, 1999. "Regulation, Land-Use Mix, and Urban Performance. Part 1: Theory," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(8), pages 1433-1442, August.
    4. Michel Opelele Omeno & Ying Yu & Wenyi Fan & Tolerant Lubalega & Chen Chen & Claude Kachaka Sudi Kaiko, 2021. "Analysis of the Impact of Land-Use/Land-Cover Change on Land-Surface Temperature in the Villages within the Luki Biosphere Reserve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Pingxing Li & Chonggang Liu & Hui Cao, 2022. "Quantitative Evaluation of Ecological Stress Caused by Land Use Transitions Considering the Location of Incremental Construction Lands: The Case of Southern Jiangsu in Yangtze River Delta Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Liu, Dongya & Zheng, Xinqi & Zhang, Chunxiao & Wang, Hongbin, 2017. "A new temporal–spatial dynamics method of simulating land-use change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Yanan Liu & Wei Zou & Kening Wu & Xiao Li & Xiaoliang Li & Rui Zhao, 2025. "The Implementation Path for a Policy Balancing Cultivated Land Occupation and Reclamation Based on Land-Type Classification—A Case Study in Heilongjiang Province," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-29, May.
    8. Man, Wang & Nie, Qin & Li, Zongmei & Li, Hui & Wu, Xuewen, 2019. "Using fractals and multifractals to characterize the spatiotemporal pattern of impervious surfaces in a coastal city: Xiamen, China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 520(C), pages 44-53.
    9. André Ménard & Danielle J Marceau, 2005. "Exploration of Spatial Scale Sensitivity in Geographic Cellular Automata," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 32(5), pages 693-714, October.
    10. Haozhi Pan & Stan Geertman & Brian Deal, 2020. "What does urban informatics add to planning support technology?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1317-1325, October.
    11. Md. Monjure Alam Pramanik & Demetris Stathakis, 2016. "Forecasting urban sprawl in Dhaka city of Bangladesh," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(4), pages 756-771, July.
    12. Yanguang Chen & Yixing Zhou, 2003. "The Rank-Size Rule and Fractal Hierarchies of Cities: Mathematical Models and Empirical Analyses," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 30(6), pages 799-818, December.
    13. Xia Li & Anthony Gar-On Yeh, 2001. "Calibration of Cellular Automata by Using Neural Networks for the Simulation of Complex Urban Systems," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(8), pages 1445-1462, August.
    14. Yan Liu & Yongjiu Feng & Robert Gilmore Pontius, 2014. "Spatially-Explicit Simulation of Urban Growth through Self-Adaptive Genetic Algorithm and Cellular Automata Modelling," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Yanguang Chen & Jiejing Wang, 2013. "Multifractal Characterization of Urban Form and Growth: The Case of Beijing," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(5), pages 884-904, October.
    16. Liuwen Liao & Enpu Ma & Hualou Long & Xiaojun Peng, 2022. "Land Use Transition and Its Ecosystem Resilience Response in China during 1990–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Jian Feng & Yanguang Chen, 2021. "Modeling Urban Growth and Socio-Spatial Dynamics of Hangzhou, China: 1964–2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Bosch, Martí & Chenal, Jérôme & Joost, Stéphane, 2019. "Addressing urban sprawl from the complexity sciences," MPRA Paper 93489, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Chen, Yanguang, 2009. "Analogies between urban hierarchies and river networks: Fractals, symmetry, and self-organized criticality," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 1766-1778.
    20. Ligang Wang & Dan Liu & Xinyi Wu & Xiaopu Zhang & Qiaoyang Liu & Weijiang Kong & Pingping Luo & Shengfu Yang, 2025. "Simulation Analysis of Land Use Change via the PLUS-GMOP Coupling Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:1286-:d:1679021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.