IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i7p1089-d863657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human Activity Intensity and Its Spatial-Temporal Evolution in China’s Border Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Cheng

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    Laboratory of Geographic Information and Spatial Analysis, Department of Geography and Planning, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

  • Hui Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Dongmei Chen

    (Laboratory of Geographic Information and Spatial Analysis, Department of Geography and Planning, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

  • Haimeng Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

Monitoring human activities in border areas is challenging due to the complex geographical environment and diverse people. China has the longest terrestrial boundary and the highest number of neighboring countries in the world. In this study, a human activity intensity index (HAI) was proposed based on land cover, population density, and satellite-based nighttime light for a long-term macroscopic study. The HAI was calculated at 1 km resolution within the 50 km buffer zone of China’s land boundary on each side in 1992, 2000, 2010, and 2020, respectively. Results show that human activity is low in about 90% of the study area. Overall, the HAI on the Chinese side is higher than that on the neighboring side, and the intensity of land use on the Chinese side has increased significantly from 1992 to 2020. Among China’s neighbors, India has the highest HAI with the fastest growth. With the changes in the HAI between China and its neighboring countries, four regional evolution patterns are found in the study area: Sino-Russian HAI decline; Sino-Kazakhstan HAI unilateral growth; Indian HAI continuous growth; China and Indochina HAI synchronized growth. Hotspot analysis reveals three spatial evolution patterns, which are unilateral expansion, bilateral expansion, and cross-border fusion. Both the “border effect” and “agglomeration effect” exist in border areas. The HAI changes in border areas not only impact the eco-environment but also affect geopolitics and geoeconomics. The HAI can be used as an instrument for decision-making and cooperation between China and neighboring countries in such areas as ecological protection, border security, and border trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Cheng & Hui Liu & Dongmei Chen & Haimeng Liu, 2022. "Human Activity Intensity and Its Spatial-Temporal Evolution in China’s Border Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:1089-:d:863657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/7/1089/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/7/1089/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wencang Shen & Jianjun Zhang & Xiangli Zhou & Shengnan Li & Xiaoli Geng, 2021. "How to Perceive the Trade-Off of Economic and Ecological Intensity of Land Use in a City? A Functional Zones-Based Case Study of Tangshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Victor Danneyrolles & Sébastien Dupuis & Gabriel Fortin & Marie Leroyer & André Römer & Raphaële Terrail & Mark Vellend & Yan Boucher & Jason Laflamme & Yves Bergeron & Dominique Arseneault, 2019. "Stronger influence of anthropogenic disturbance than climate change on century-scale compositional changes in northern forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Galen Murton, 2017. "Making Mountain Places into State Spaces: Infrastructure, Consumption, and Territorial Practice in a Himalayan Borderland," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(2), pages 536-545, March.
    4. Ying Ge & Yin He & Yeheng Jiang & Xiaopeng Yin, 2014. "Special Issue: Issues in Asia. Guest Editor: Laixun Zhao," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(2), pages 300-312, May.
    5. Charlotta Mellander & José Lobo & Kevin Stolarick & Zara Matheson, 2015. "Night-Time Light Data: A Good Proxy Measure for Economic Activity?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Paul J. Crutzen, 2002. "Geology of mankind," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6867), pages 23-23, January.
    7. Guangxing Ji & Huiyun Song & Hejie Wei & Leying Wu, 2021. "Attribution Analysis of Climate and Anthropic Factors on Runoff and Vegetation Changes in the Source Area of the Yangtze River from 1982 to 2016," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Arnaud Lechevalier, 2013. "Borders and borders regions in Europe," Post-Print halshs-00926919, HAL.
    9. Xiaobo Su & Xiaomei Cai, 2020. "Space of Compromise: Border Control and the Limited Inclusion of Burmese Migrants in China," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(3), pages 847-863, May.
    10. Li, Shicheng & Zhang, Yili & Wang, Zhaofeng & Li, Lanhui, 2018. "Mapping human influence intensity in the Tibetan Plateau for conservation of ecological service functions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(PB), pages 276-286.
    11. McCallum, John, 1995. "National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(3), pages 615-623, June.
    12. Abhishek Singhal & Sohini Sahu & Siddhartha Chattopadhyay & Abhijit Mukherjee & Soumendra N Bhanja, 2020. "Using night time lights to find regional inequality in India and its relationship with economic development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Xiaona Liu & Luguang Jiang & Zhiming Feng & Peng Li, 2016. "Rubber Plantation Expansion Related Land Use Change along the Laos-China Border Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Yi Cheng & Haimeng Liu & Shaobin Wang & Xuegang Cui & Qirui Li, 2021. "Global Action on SDGs: Policy Review and Outlook in a Post-Pandemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yan Huang & Wei Lang & Tingting Chen & Jiemin Wu, 2023. "Regional Coordinated Development in the Megacity Regions: Spatial Pattern and Driving Forces of the Guangzhou-Foshan Cross-Border Area in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-27, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stelios Michalopoulos & Elias Papaioannou, 2018. "Spatial Patterns of Development: A Meso Approach," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 383-410, August.
    2. Shapiro, Daniel & Oh, Chang Hoon & Zhang, Peng, 2023. "Nighttime lights data and their implications for IB research," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    3. Bohao Cui & Yili Zhang & Zhaofeng Wang & Changjun Gu & Linshan Liu & Bo Wei & Dianqing Gong & Mohan Kumar Rai, 2022. "Ecological Risk Assessment of Transboundary Region Based on Land-Cover Change: A Case Study of Gandaki River Basin, Himalayas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Mitze, Timo & Breidenbach, Philipp, 2023. "The complex regional effects of macro-institutional shocks: Evidence from EU economic integration over three decades," Ruhr Economic Papers 1007, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    5. Jules Hugot and Camilo Umana-Dajud & Camilo Umaña-Dajud, 2017. "Trade Costs and the Suez and Panama Canals," Vniversitas Económica, Universidad Javeriana - Bogotá, vol. 0(0), pages 1-33, March.
    6. Dirk Steffen & Ingo Pitterle, 2004. "Spillover Effects of Fiscal Policy Under Flexible Exchange Rates," Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings 286, Econometric Society.
    7. Nilanjan Banik & John Gilbert, 2010. "Regional Integration and Trade Costs in South Asia," Chapters, in: Douglas H. Brooks & Susan F. Stone (ed.), Trade Facilitation and Regional Cooperation in Asia, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Chengkun Huang & Feiyang Lin & Deping Chu & Lanlan Wang & Jiawei Liao & Junqian Wu, 2021. "Coupling Relationship and Interactive Response between Intensive Land Use and Tourism Industry Development in China’s Major Tourist Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Shilpi, Forhad & Umali-Deininger, Dina, 2007. "Where to sell ? market facilities and agricultural marketing," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4455, The World Bank.
    10. Marc Flandreau & Mathilde Maurel, 2005. "Monetary Union, Trade Integration, and Business Cycles in 19th Century Europe," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 135-152, April.
    11. Fetzer, James J. & Rivera, Sandra A., 2005. "Modeling Modifications in Rules of Origin: A Partial Equilibrium Approach," Conference papers 331372, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Snir, Avichai & Levy, Daniel, 2010. "Economic Growth in the Potterian Economy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 211-236.
    13. Markus Brueckner & Ngo Van Long & Joaquin L. Vespignani, 2020. "Non-Gravity Trade," Globalization Institute Working Papers 388, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
    14. Giri, Rahul, 2012. "Local costs of distribution, international trade costs and micro evidence on the law of one price," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 82-100.
    15. Ingo Eduard Isphording & Sebastian Otten, 2013. "The Costs of Babylon—Linguistic Distance in Applied Economics," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 354-369, May.
    16. Frensch, Richard & Fidrmuc, Jarko & Rindler, Michael, 2023. "Topography, borders, and trade across Europe," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 816-832.
    17. Walid Hejazi, 2005. "Are Regional Concentrations of OECD Exports and Outward FDI Consistent with Gravity?," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 33(4), pages 423-436, December.
    18. Saul Estrin & Yuan Hu & Daniel Shapiro & Peng Zhang, 2024. "Agglomeration costs limit sustainable innovation in cities in developing economies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-24, November.
    19. John F. Helliwell, 1996. "Do Borders Matter for Social Capital? Economic Growth and Civic Culture in U.S. States and Canadian Provinces," NBER Working Papers 5863, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Virag-Neumann, Ildiko, 2015. "Impacts of EU Enlargement Process: A Gravity Model Approach," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2015), Kotor, Montengero, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Kotor, Montengero, 10-11 September 2015, pages 453-460, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:1089-:d:863657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.