IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i11p1885-d951377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Location and Crop Choices in China: A Revisitation on Von Thünen Model

Author

Listed:
  • Hongyun Han

    (School of Public Affairs, China Academy for Rural Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Zhen Yuan

    (School of Public Affairs, China Academy for Rural Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Kai Zou

    (School of Public Affairs, China Academy for Rural Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

Abstract

Growing populations and rapid urbanization have put tremendous pressure on the food supply. The rural hinterland around cities is an important source of the urban food supply chain. Facing the constraints of China’s land stock, reasonable use of land space and optimization of agricultural crop structure is crucial to meet the food demand. Von Thünen Model, which is fronted by a 19th-century German economist, outlines a rural landscape of commercial farmers growing agricultural products for local markets while proposing basic patterns and principles of land use in agriculture. Using data from China’s OVOP (“One village, One product”), this paper analyzes the agricultural location and crop choices around two levels of cities (provincial capital cities, and county-level cities) by using Thünen’s theory. The results showed that crop density did decrease as the distance to urban increased. Crop rings are present in the vicinity of both metropolitan and county-level cities, distributed according to crop intensity. Evidence from China suggests that agricultural location and crop selection still follow the basic principles of the Thünen model. Planners and policymakers should refocus on the Von Thünen model to utilize land space and optimize agricultural production scientifically and efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongyun Han & Zhen Yuan & Kai Zou, 2022. "Agricultural Location and Crop Choices in China: A Revisitation on Von Thünen Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:1885-:d:951377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Krzymowski, 1928. "Graphical Presentation of Thuenen's Theory of Intensity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 10(4), pages 461-482.
    2. Amirinejad, Ghazal & Donehue, Paul & Baker, Douglas, 2018. "Ambiguity at the peri-urban interface in Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 472-480.
    3. Nancy E. Bockstael, 1996. "Modeling Economics and Ecology: The Importance of a Spatial Perspective," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(5), pages 1168-1180.
    4. Jacques-François Thisse, 2011. "Geographical Economics: A Historical Perspective," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 77(2), pages 141-168.
    5. Thomas J. Holmes & Sanghoon Lee, 2012. "Economies of Density versus Natural Advantage: Crop Choice on the Back Forty," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(1), pages 1-19, February.
    6. James Hite, 1997. "The Thunen Model and the New Economic Geography as a Paradigm for Rural Development Policy," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 230-240.
    7. Samuelson, Paul A, 1983. "Thunen at Two Hundred," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 21(4), pages 1468-1488, December.
    8. Daniel Block & E. Melanie DuPuis, 2001. "Making the Country Work for the City: Von Thünen's Ideas in Geography, Agricultural Economics and the Sociology of Agriculture," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 79-98, January.
    9. Martin T. Katzman, 1977. "The Von Thuenen Paradigm, the Industrial-Urban Hypothesis, and the Spatial Structure of Agriculture: Reply," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 59(4), pages 775-777.
    10. Yong-sheng Wang, 2019. "The Challenges and Strategies of Food Security under Rapid Urbanization in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, January.
    11. Blaug,Mark, 1997. "Economic Theory in Retrospect," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521577014, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arora, Gaurav & Feng, Hongli & Hennessy, David A. & Loesch, Charles R. & Kvas, Susan, 2021. "The impact of production network economies on spatially-contiguous conservation– Theoretical model with evidence from the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Tomasz Grodzicki & Mateusz Jankiewicz, 2020. "Forecasting the Level of Unemployment, Inflation and Wages: The Case of Sweden," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 400-409.
    3. Kuminoff, Nicolai V. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2001. "What Drives Farmland Conversion: Farm Returns Versus Urban Factors?," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20659, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Georg Blind & Andreas Pyka, 2015. "Erich Schneider: The admiring disciple who did not become a follower," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 239-252, January.
    5. Hsing-Hsiang Huang & Michael R. Moore, 2018. "Farming under Weather Risk: Adaptation, Moral Hazard, and Selection on Moral Hazard," NBER Chapters, in: Agricultural Productivity and Producer Behavior, pages 77-124, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Stephen J. Redding, 2010. "The Empirics Of New Economic Geography," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 297-311, February.
    7. Pamela Katic, 2015. "Groundwater Spatial Dynamics and Endogenous Well Location," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(1), pages 181-196, January.
    8. Su, Huei-Chun & Colander, David, 2021. "The Economist As Scientist, Engineer, Or Plumber?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 297-312, June.
    9. Carrión-Flores, Carmen E. & Flores-Lagunes, Alfonso & Guci, Ledia, 2018. "An estimator for discrete-choice models with spatial lag dependence using large samples, with an application to land-use conversions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 77-93.
    10. Fujita, Masahisa & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2009. "New Economic Geography: An appraisal on the occasion of Paul Krugman's 2008 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 109-119, March.
    11. Khalid Iqbal, 2017. "Welfare Economics: A Story of Existence," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 20(64), pages 75-83, June.
    12. Castle, Emery N., 2000. "The Economics Of Rural Places And Agricultural Economics," 2000 Annual Meeting, June 29-July 1, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia 36361, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    13. William R. Kerr & Scott Duke Kominers, 2015. "Agglomerative Forces and Cluster Shapes," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(4), pages 877-899, October.
    14. Krieger, Tim & Nientiedt, Daniel, 2022. "The renaissance of ordoliberalism in the 1970s and 1980s," Discussion Paper Series 2022-05, University of Freiburg, Wilfried Guth Endowed Chair for Constitutional Political Economy and Competition Policy.
    15. Kuminoff, Nicolai V. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2001. "Modeling Farmland Conversion with New GIS Data," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 271494, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Johnston, Robert J. & Bauer, Dana Marie & Swallow, Stephen K., 2000. "The Influence Of Spatial Land Use Patterns On Rural Amenity Values And Willingness To Pay For Growth Management: Evidence From A Contingent Choice Survey," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21766, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Robert Deacon & Charles Kolstad & Allen Kneese & David Brookshire & David Scrogin & Anthony Fisher & Michael Ward & Kerry Smith & James Wilen, 1998. "Research Trends and Opportunities in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(3), pages 383-397, April.
    18. Rauscher, Michael & Barbier, Edward B., 2010. "Biodiversity and geography," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 241-260, April.
    19. Khalid Haniza, 2015. "Spatial heterogeneity and spatial bias analyses in hedonic price models: some practical considerations," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 28(28), pages 113-128, June.
    20. M. Scott Taylor & Juan Moreno Cruz, "undated". "Back to the Future of Green Powered Economies," Working Papers 2014-69, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, revised 29 Sep 2014.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:1885-:d:951377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.