IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i8p437-d1718694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does the Power Generation Mix Affect the Market Value of US Energy Companies?

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Bressan

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Free University of Bozen, 39100 Bolzano, Italy)

Abstract

To remain competitive in the decarbonization process of the economy worldwide, energy companies must preserve their market value to attract new investors and remain resilient throughout the transition to net zero. This article examines the market value of US energy companies during the period 2012–2024 in relation to their power generation mix. Panel regression analyses reveal that Tobin’s q and price-to-book ratios increase significantly for solar and wind power, while they experience moderate increases for natural gas power. In contrast, Tobin’s q and price-to-book ratios decline for nuclear and coal power. Furthermore, accounting-based profitability, measured by the return on assets (ROA), does not show significant variation with any type of power generation. The findings suggest that market investors prefer solar, wind, and natural gas power generation, thereby attributing greater value (that is, demanding lower risk compensation) to green companies compared to traditional ones. These insights provide guidance to executives, investors, and policy makers on how the power generation mix can influence strategic decisions in the energy sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Bressan, 2025. "How Does the Power Generation Mix Affect the Market Value of US Energy Companies?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:437-:d:1718694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/8/437/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/8/437/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahul Verma & Arpita A. Shroff, 2025. "ESG Risks and Market Valuations: Evidence from the Energy Sector," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Chaymae Boubii & Ismail El Kafazi & Rachid Bannari & Brahim El Bhiri & Badre Bossoufi & Hossam Kotb & Kareem M. AboRas & Ahmed Emara & Badr Nasiri, 2024. "Synergizing Wind and Solar Power: An Advanced Control System for Grid Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-44, January.
    3. Bohyun Yoon & Jeong Hwan Lee & Ryan Byun, 2018. "Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Darrell E. Lee & James G. Tompkins, 1999. "A Modified Version of the Lewellen and Badrinath Measure of Tobin's Q," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 28(1), Spring.
    5. Jared Jennings & Jung Min Kim & Joshua Lee & Daniel Taylor, 2024. "Measurement error, fixed effects, and false positives in accounting research," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 959-995, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bin Wang & Chenchen Wei & Longmei Shi & Xiaoqiang Cheng & Xueqin Shi, 2025. "ESG and firm operational efficiency: evidence from Chinese listed companies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 681-714, January.
    2. Anrong Gao & Tianren Xiong & Yuxi Luo & Defeng Meng, 2023. "Promote or Crowd Out? The Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure Methods on Enterprise Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Sugumar Mariappanadar, 2025. "Human Capital to Implement Corporate Sustainability Business Strategies for Common Good," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Barros, Victor & Falcão, Pedro Fontes & Sarmento, Joaquim Miranda, 2022. "Are more sustainable firms able to operate with lower working capital requirements?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    5. Eduardo Ortas & Igor Álvarez & Ainhoa Garayar, 2015. "The Environmental, Social, Governance, and Financial Performance Effects on Companies that Adopt the United Nations Global Compact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Zaheer Alam & Yasir Bin Tariq, 2023. "Corporate Sustainability Performance Evaluation and Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    7. Bohyun Yoon & Jeong-Hwan Lee & Jin-Hyung Cho, 2021. "The Effect of ESG Performance on Tax Avoidance—Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Min-Jung Kang & Seul-Gi Oh & Ho-Young Lee, 2022. "The Association between Outside Directors’ Compensation and ESG Performance: Evidence from Korean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Veeravel, V & Murugesan, Vijaya Prabhagar & Narayanamurthy, Vijayakumar, 2024. "Does ESG disclosure really influence the firm performance? Evidence from India," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 193-202.
    10. Dhasmana, Samriddhi & Goel, Sandeep, 2023. "The insidious hyperreality in financial markets: An integrative review with evidence from the Indian financial market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Claudia Mihaela Rapan & Viorel-Costin Banta & Andreia Manea & Mamoun Walid Aridah, 2022. "Value Relevance of ESG Scores: Evidence from European Stock Exchange Markets," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 68-75, June.
    12. Christophe, Stephen E. & Lee, Hun, 2005. "What matters about internationalization: a market-based assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 636-643, May.
    13. Chen, Zhengqiang & Ying, Hua & Chen, Qiaoyan, 2024. "Major sporting events, corporate social responsibility, and the value of sports-listed companies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    14. Mongkhol Moolkham, 2025. "SET ESG ratings and firm value: The new sustainability performance assessment tool in Thailand," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, February.
    15. Pornanong Budsaratragoon & Boonlert Jitmaneeroj, 2021. "Corporate Sustainability and Stock Value in Asian–Pacific Emerging Markets: Synergies or Tradeoffs among ESG Factors?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    16. Alicia Fernanda Galindo-Manrique & Esteban Pérez-Calderón & Martha del Pilar Rodríguez-García, 2021. "Eco-Efficiency and Stock Market Volatility: Emerging Markets Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, April.
    17. Tarsisius Renald Suganda & Jungmu Kim, 2023. "An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Default Risk: Evidence in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Mohammed Abdullah Ammer & Meqbel Mishary Aliedan & Mansour Abdullah Alyahya, 2020. "Do Corporate Environmental Sustainability Practices Influence Firm Value? The Role of Independent Directors: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Andrea Mantovi & Augusto Schianchi, 2015. "A Neo-Austrian Perspective on the Value of Growth Prospects," Working Paper series 15-41, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    20. Mărioara Beleneși & Victoria Bogdan & Dorina Nicoleta Popa, 2021. "Disclosure Dynamics and Non-Financial Reporting Analysis. The Case of Romanian Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:437-:d:1718694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.