IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2022i1p4-d1011969.html

Comparison of Multifactor Asset Pricing Models in the South African Stock Market [2000–2016]

Author

Listed:
  • Lenia Mukoyi

    (School of Business and Finance, University of the Western Cape, Belville, Cape Town 7535, Western Cape, South Africa)

  • Kanayo K. Ogujiuba

    (School of Development Studies, University of Mpumalanga, Nelspruit 1200, Mpumalanga, South Africa)

Abstract

The quest for parsimonious models has been a key objective in asset pricing. However, there appears to be no consensus on the most successful asset pricing strategy in the literature, especially for the South African Market. Using financial statements from January 2000 to December 2015, this article explores how market anomalies affect the performance of securities in the Johannesburg Stock Exchange’s (JSE’s) resources, industrial, and finance sectors. We investigated the efficacy of several asset pricing models and their capacity to account for market anomalies in the JSE’s resources, industrial, and financial sectors, as well as the applicability of the Fama and French five-factor model. The study used multiple regression techniques and applied stationarity and cointegration methods to ensure robust results. Results also suggest that when the FF5FM is implemented, there is statistical significance at the 10% level for the CMA in the resources sector as the value factor disappears. The FF5FM results in the industrial sector show a significance level of 5% in the SMB. The financial sector seems to have the majority of the style-based risk factors as the SMB is positively significant at a 5% level, the HML is significant at a 1% level, and the CMA is negatively significant at a 10% level of significance. The results suggest that the Carhart Four Factor model is the best to use in all market conditions. Results also show that value becomes redundant in a bullish market, but the opposite holds in a bearish market for a model with operating profitably and investing factors. These findings highlight the necessity for investors to determine which investment risk elements produce abnormal returns in both bearish and bullish market circumstances before investing.

Suggested Citation

  • Lenia Mukoyi & Kanayo K. Ogujiuba, 2022. "Comparison of Multifactor Asset Pricing Models in the South African Stock Market [2000–2016]," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:4-:d:1011969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali, Fahad & Ülkü, Numan, 2021. "Quest for a parsimonious factor model in the wake of quality-minus-junk, misvaluation and Fama-French-six factors," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    2. Banz, Rolf W., 1981. "The relationship between return and market value of common stocks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 3-18, March.
    3. Ryan Kruger & Francois Toerien, 2014. "The Consistency Of Equity Style Anomalies On The JSE During A Period Of Market Crisis," The African Finance Journal, Africagrowth Institute, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18.
    4. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 2015. "A five-factor asset pricing model," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 1-22.
    5. Basu, S, 1977. "Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price-Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Hypothesis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 32(3), pages 663-682, June.
    6. Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 383-417, May.
    7. Jegadeesh, Narasimhan & Titman, Sheridan, 1993. "Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(1), pages 65-91, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hassan Zada & Naveed Khan & Kai-Yin Woo & Sana Gaied Chortane, 2025. "Asset Pricing: A Comparative Analysis of Fama-French Five-Factor with Human Capital-Based Six-Factor Model," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 29(4), pages 1-37.
    2. Bordalo, Pedro & Gennaioli, Nicola & La Porta, Rafael & Shleifer, Andrei, 2025. "Finance without exotic risk," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Ailie Charteris & Mukashema Rwishema & Tafadzwa-Hidah Chidede, 2018. "Asset Pricing and Momentum: A South African Perspective," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 62-85, January.
    4. Wing-Keung Wong & Riffat Mughal & Mustafa Afeef & Naveed Khan & Hassan Zada, 2026. "Human Capital Based Six-Factor Asset Pricing Model in the Era of Covid-19," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 33(1), pages 25-63, March.
    5. Kaserer Christoph & Hanauer Matthias X., 2017. "25 Jahre Fama-French-Modell: Erklärungsgehalt, Anomalien und praktische Implikationen," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 98-116, June.
    6. Tarunika Jain Agrawal & Sanjay Sehgal & Vibhuti Vasishth, 2020. "Firm Attributes, Corporate Fundamentals and Investment Strategies: An Empirical Study for Indian Stock Market," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 45(3), pages 366-387, August.
    7. Eero Pätäri & Timo Leivo, 2017. "A Closer Look At Value Premium: Literature Review And Synthesis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 79-168, February.
    8. Nabil Sifouh & Ismail Benslimane & Karim Ameziane, 2024. "A critical look at teaching and doing research in finance," Post-Print hal-04936832, HAL.
    9. Dimitrios Koutmos & Gregory Koutmos, 2026. "On the Contribution of Multi-factors to Hedge Fund Returns," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 16(5), pages 1-1.
    10. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2017. "Research in finance: A review of influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 188-199.
    11. Gikas Hardouvelis & George Papanastasopoulos & Dimitrios D. Thomakos & Tao Wang, 2007. "Accruals, Net Stock Issues and Value-Glamour Anomalies: New Evidence on their Relation," Working Paper series 47_07, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    12. Adam Zaremba & Jacob Koby Shemer, 2018. "Price-Based Investment Strategies," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-91530-2, January.
    13. Geertsema, Paul & Lu, Helen, 2020. "The correlation structure of anomaly strategies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Ryan Bartens & Shakill Hassan, 2010. "Value, size and momentum portfolios in real time: the cross section of South African stocks," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 35(2), pages 181-202, August.
    15. Paul Handro & Bogdan Dima, 2024. "Analyzing Financial Markets Efficiency: Insights from a Bibliometric and Content Review," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 16(9), pages 119-175, May.
    16. Jiaju Miao & Pawel Polak, 2023. "Online Ensemble Learning for Sector Rotation: A Gradient-Free Framework," Papers 2304.09947, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    17. Ray Ball & Gil Sadka & Ayung Tseng, 2022. "Correction to: using accounting earnings and aggregate economic indicators to estimate firm-level systematic risk," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 647-648, June.
    18. van Cappelle, Tjeerd & Pokidin, Dmytro & Zwinkels, Remco C.J., 2025. "The cross section of stock returns in an artificial stock market," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    19. Zura Kakushadze & Willie Yu, 2016. "Multifactor Risk Models and Heterotic CAPM," Papers 1602.04902, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    20. Hanauer, Matthias X. & Lauterbach, Jochim G., 2019. "The cross-section of emerging market stock returns," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 265-286.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:4-:d:1011969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.