IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i2p104-d1672677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Short-Term Volatility to Long-Term Growth: Restricted Stock Units’ Impact on Earnings per Share and Profit Growth Across Sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Won (Albert) Park

    (Seoul Business School, aSSIST University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 04628, Republic of Korea
    Business School Lausanne, Route de la Maladière 21, 1022 Chavannes-près-Renens, Switzerland)

  • Elena Sernova

    (Business School Lausanne, Route de la Maladière 21, 1022 Chavannes-près-Renens, Switzerland)

  • Cheong-Yeul Park

    (Seoul Business School, aSSIST University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 04628, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This research empirically investigates how the adoption of restricted stock units (RSUs) affects earnings per share (EPS) and operating profit, focusing on variations across industries. RSUs have emerged as a strategic compensation tool for promoting alignment between employee interests and long-term organizational objectives, while overcoming the short-sighted focus typically associated with conventional stock options. However, previous studies have mainly focused on analyzing the average effect of RSU or verifying only whether there is a short-term improvement in performance after its introduction, and there has been no sufficient review of the long-term effects. In addition, there is a lack of analyses on how the effects of RSU differ by industry. To fill this research gap, this study applied hierarchical regression analysis to S&P 500 company data from 1997 to 2023 to compare and analyze the differential effects of RSU by industry. The analysis showed that the EPS and operating income were only significantly affected by some industries in the early stages of RSU introduction, but the EPS and operating income were significantly improved in all industries in the long term. In addition, it was confirmed that the effects of RSU differ depending on the characteristics of the industry. This study empirically verifies the long-term effects of RSU and the differences by industry, offering practical insights for executives and shareholders when utilizing RSUs as a forward-looking compensation mechanism that fosters sustainable performance and enduring corporate value.

Suggested Citation

  • Won (Albert) Park & Elena Sernova & Cheong-Yeul Park, 2025. "From Short-Term Volatility to Long-Term Growth: Restricted Stock Units’ Impact on Earnings per Share and Profit Growth Across Sectors," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-35, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:104-:d:1672677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/2/104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/2/104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lovett, Steve & Rasheed, Abdul A. & Hou, Wanrong, 2022. "Stock options, restricted stock, salary, or bonus? Managing CEO compensation to maximize organizational performance," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 115-123.
    2. Brian J. Hall & Kevin J. Murphy, 2003. "The Trouble with Stock Options," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 49-70, Summer.
    3. DeFusco, Richard A & Johnson, Robert R & Zorn, Thomas S, 1990. "The Effect of Executive Stock Option Plans on Stockholders and Bondholders," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 45(2), pages 617-627, June.
    4. Yermack, David, 1995. "Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2-3), pages 237-269.
    5. Abudy, Menachem (Meni) & Benninga, Simon, 2016. "Valuing restricted stock grants to non-executive employees," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 33-51.
    6. Söhnke M. Bartram & Gregory Brown & René M. Stulz, 2012. "Why Are U.S. Stocks More Volatile?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 67(4), pages 1329-1370, August.
    7. Brian J. Hall & Kevin J. Murphy, 2003. "The Trouble with Stock Options," NBER Working Papers 9784, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 383-417, May.
    9. Brav, Alon & Graham, John R. & Harvey, Campbell R. & Michaely, Roni, 2005. "Payout policy in the 21st century," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 483-527, September.
    10. repec:arz:wpaper:eres2012-213 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Guler Aras & David Crowther, 2010. "Analysing social responsibility in financial companies," International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 295-308.
    12. Surjit Singh & Kanwar Navdeep Si Guleria, 2012. "Housing and realty: Policies and dynamics of urban economics in Indian capital cities," ERES eres2012_213, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    13. Coles, Jeffrey L. & Daniel, Naveen D. & Naveen, Lalitha, 2006. "Managerial incentives and risk-taking," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 431-468, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hickfang, Michael & Holder, Ulrike, 2018. "The impact of stock options on risk-taking: Founder-CEOs and innovation," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 12/2018, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    2. Koharki, Kevin & Watson, Luke, 2025. "Risk-taking incentives and firm credit risk11The authors thank Kristine W. Hankins (editor), the anonymous associate editor and two anonymous reviewers, workshop participants at Lehigh University, Nor," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Carola Frydman & Dirk Jenter, 2010. "CEO Compensation," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 75-102, December.
    4. Tang, Chun-Hua, 2012. "Revisiting the incentive effects of executive stock options," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 564-574.
    5. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    6. Yaowen Shan & Terry Walter, 2016. "Towards a Set of Design Principles for Executive Compensation Contracts," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(4), pages 619-684, December.
    7. Yiwei Dou & M. H. Franco Wong & Baohua Xin, 2019. "The Effect of Financial Reporting Quality on Corporate Investment Efficiency: Evidence from the Adoption of SFAS No. 123R," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2249-2266, May.
    8. Ulrike Malmendier, 2018. "Behavioral Corporate Finance," NBER Working Papers 25162, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Page, T. Beau, 2018. "CEO attributes, compensation, and firm value: Evidence from a structural estimation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 378-401.
    10. Won (Albert) Park & Elena Sernova & Cheong-Yeul Park, 2025. "Strategic Impacts of RSUs on Company Performance: Insights into EPS and Profitability Growth," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Wei Zhang & Steven F. Cahan, 2010. "Nonrecurring Accounting Transactions and Stock Option Grants," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1-2), pages 93-129.
    12. Doyoung Kim, 2010. "The use of stock-based pay for sorting: an empirical analysis of compensation for new CEOs," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(23), pages 2999-3010.
    13. Hyungshin Park & Dimitris Vrettos, 2015. "The Moderating Effect of Relative Performance Evaluation on the Risk Incentive Properties of Executives’ Equity Portfolios," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 1055-1108, December.
    14. Hillegeist, Stephen A. & Peñalva, Fernando, 2004. "Stock option incentives and firm performance," IESE Research Papers D/535, IESE Business School.
    15. Vo, Thi Thanh Nha & Canil, Jean Milva, 2019. "CEO pay disparity: Efficient contracting or managerial power?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 168-190.
    16. Cook, Douglas O. & Chowdhury, Jaideep & Zhang, Weiwei, 2023. "Director optimism and CEO equity compensation," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 143-162.
    17. de Meza, David & Webb, David C., 2003. "Principal agent problems under loss aversion: an application to executive stock options," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24676, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Xavier Gabaix & Augustin Landier, 2008. "Why has CEO Pay Increased So Much?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 123(1), pages 49-100.
    19. Abdelaziz Elmarzougui, 2006. "Evolution et sensibilité des stock-options : cas du marché français," Working Papers hal-04138526, HAL.
    20. Ilona Babenko & Rik Sen, 2016. "Do Nonexecutive Employees Have Valuable Information? Evidence from Employee Stock Purchase Plans," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(7), pages 1878-1898, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:104-:d:1672677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.