IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i1p34-d1603615.html

Strategic Impacts of RSUs on Company Performance: Insights into EPS and Profitability Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Won (Albert) Park

    (Seoul Business School, aSSIST University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 04628, Republic of Korea
    Doctorate of Business Administration (DBA) Program, Lausanne Business School, 1022 Chavannes, Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Elena Sernova

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Lausanne Business School, 1022 Chavannes, Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Cheong-Yeul Park

    (Seoul Business School, aSSIST University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 04628, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Restricted stock units (RSUs) are a key component of executive compensation schemes, aligning executive incentives with the long-term goals of the company and compensating for the limitations of traditional stock options. This study empirically analyzes the impact of RSUs on corporate performance, particularly earnings per share (EPS) and operating profit. S&P 500 companies’ 27 years of data from 1997 to 2023 were used to evaluate the change in performance before and after the introduction of RSUs, and a paired t -test and hierarchical regression analysis were applied. The research results show that the introduction of RSUs has a stronger performance improvement effect in the 6th to 10th year after the introduction, suggesting that over time, even if RSUs cause short-term cost burdens, they increase the company’s financial stability in the long term and contribute to sustainable growth. In addition, the same analysis was conducted by setting not only EPS but also operating profit as an alternative variable, and it was confirmed that RSUs also have a positive impact on actual profitability improvement. This study emphasizes the need for companies to design RSUs as a strategic compensation system for long-term value creation, not as a short-term performance reward, and suggests the need for a further analysis of the effects of RSUs in various industries and regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Won (Albert) Park & Elena Sernova & Cheong-Yeul Park, 2025. "Strategic Impacts of RSUs on Company Performance: Insights into EPS and Profitability Growth," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:34-:d:1603615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/1/34/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/1/34/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yermack, David, 1995. "Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2-3), pages 237-269.
    2. Coles, Jeffrey L. & Daniel, Naveen D. & Naveen, Lalitha, 2006. "Managerial incentives and risk-taking," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 431-468, February.
    3. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    4. Brian J. Hall & Kevin J. Murphy, 2003. "The Trouble with Stock Options," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 49-70, Summer.
    5. Brian J. Hall & Kevin J. Murphy, 2003. "The Trouble with Stock Options," NBER Working Papers 9784, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. McConnell, John J. & Servaes, Henri, 1990. "Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 595-612, October.
    7. DeFusco, Richard A & Johnson, Robert R & Zorn, Thomas S, 1990. "The Effect of Executive Stock Option Plans on Stockholders and Bondholders," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 45(2), pages 617-627, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaowen Shan & Terry Walter, 2016. "Towards a Set of Design Principles for Executive Compensation Contracts," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(4), pages 619-684, December.
    2. Carola Frydman & Dirk Jenter, 2010. "CEO Compensation," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 75-102, December.
    3. Koharki, Kevin & Watson, Luke, 2025. "Risk-taking incentives and firm credit risk11The authors thank Kristine W. Hankins (editor), the anonymous associate editor and two anonymous reviewers, workshop participants at Lehigh University, Northwestern University, Southern Methodist Universit," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Ashrafee Hossain & Abdullah‐al Masum & Samir Saadi & Ramzi Benkraiem & Nirmol Das, 2023. "Firm-Level Climate Change Risk and CEO Equity Incentives," Post-Print hal-04434397, HAL.
    5. Page, T. Beau, 2018. "CEO attributes, compensation, and firm value: Evidence from a structural estimation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 378-401.
    6. Wei Zhang & Steven F. Cahan, 2010. "Nonrecurring Accounting Transactions and Stock Option Grants," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1-2), pages 93-129.
    7. Kim, Jeong-Bon & Li, Yinghua & Zhang, Liandong, 2011. "CFOs versus CEOs: Equity incentives and crashes," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 713-730, September.
    8. Won (Albert) Park & Elena Sernova & Cheong-Yeul Park, 2025. "From Short-Term Volatility to Long-Term Growth: Restricted Stock Units’ Impact on Earnings per Share and Profit Growth Across Sectors," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-35, June.
    9. Jang, Soomi & Kovacs, Tunde & Choi, Heeick, 2026. "Employee stock options and innovation: Evidence from an exogenous shock to employee intellectual property rights," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Hyungshin Park & Dimitris Vrettos, 2015. "The Moderating Effect of Relative Performance Evaluation on the Risk Incentive Properties of Executives’ Equity Portfolios," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 53(5), pages 1055-1108, December.
    11. Hillegeist, Stephen A. & Peñalva, Fernando, 2004. "Stock option incentives and firm performance," IESE Research Papers D/535, IESE Business School.
    12. Hickfang, Michael & Holder, Ulrike, 2018. "The impact of stock options on risk-taking: Founder-CEOs and innovation," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 12/2018, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    13. Agarwal, Vikas & Daniel, Naveen D. & Naik, Narayan Y., 2009. "Role of managerial incentives and discretion in hedge fund performance," CFR Working Papers 04-04, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    14. Tang, Chun-Hua, 2012. "Revisiting the incentive effects of executive stock options," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 564-574.
    15. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    16. Erik Devos & William B. Elliott & Richard S. Warr, 2018. "The Propensity to Split and CEO Compensation," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 47(1), pages 105-129, March.
    17. Coles, Jeffrey L. & Daniel, Naveen D. & Naveen, Lalitha, 2006. "Managerial incentives and risk-taking," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 431-468, February.
    18. Habib Jouber, 2016. "The relationship between CEO performance-based compensation and shareholders value creation: a cross national analysis," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22.
    19. Yi Feng & Yisong S. Tian, 2009. "Option Expensing and Managerial Equity Incentives," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 195-241, August.
    20. Ulrike Malmendier, 2018. "Behavioral Corporate Finance," NBER Working Papers 25162, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:34-:d:1603615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.