IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p670-d719927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends in Smoking Prevalence and Intensity between 2010 and 2018: Implications for Tobacco Control in China

Author

Listed:
  • Guoting Zhang

    (Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Jiajia Zhan

    (Department of Economics and Public Policy, Business School, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK)

  • Hongqiao Fu

    (Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China)

Abstract

Background: China is the world’s largest producer and consumer of cigarettes. Since 2010, the Chinese government has implemented many policies to combat the tobacco epidemic, yet little is known about their overall impacts. This study aims to investigate the trends in smoking prevalence and intensity between 2010 and 2018. Methods: We use five waves of data from China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), a nationally representative survey, to examine the trends in smoking prevalence and intensity. We use the chi-square test and t -test to examine differences across waves. Binary logistic regressions and linear regressions are applied to examine the association between smoking behaviors and risk factors. Results: The current smoking prevalence dropped from 30.30% in 2010 (90% CI 29.47–31.31) to 28.69% (90% CI 27.69–29.69) in 2018. As for smoking intensity, the average daily cigarettes consumption decreased steadily from 16.96 cigarettes (90% CI 16.55–17.36) in 2010 to 15.12 cigarettes (90% CI 15.07–15.94) in 2018. Smoking risk factors for men included marriage status, education level, employment status, alcohol consumption, and physical activities. The smoking risk was higher for women with a lower education level, lower household income, unemployment status, and alcohol consumption behavior. Conclusions: Our study shows declined trends in both smoking prevalence and intensity between 2010 and 2018, suggesting some positive progress in tobacco control in China. Nonetheless, to achieve the goal of reducing smoking prevalence among people aged 15 and above to less than 20% by 2030, the Chinese government needs to take stronger anti-tobacco measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Guoting Zhang & Jiajia Zhan & Hongqiao Fu, 2022. "Trends in Smoking Prevalence and Intensity between 2010 and 2018: Implications for Tobacco Control in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:670-:d:719927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/670/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/670/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikael Bask & Maria Melkersson, 2004. "Rationally addicted to drinking and smoking?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 373-381.
    2. Qing Wang & Jay J Shen & Michelle Sotero & Casey A Li & Zhiyuan Hou, 2018. "Income, occupation and education: Are they related to smoking behaviors in China?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Pierpaolo Pierani & Silvia Tiezzi, 2009. "Addiction and interaction between alcohol and tobacco consumption," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Weidong Wang & Yongqing Dong & Xiaohong Liu & Linxiu Zhang & Yunli Bai & Spencer Hagist, 2018. "The More Educated, the Healthier: Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huiting Chen & Jigen Na & Hang An & Ming Jin & Xiaoqian Jia & Lailai Yan & Nan Li & Zhiwen Li, 2022. "Passive Smoking Is Associated with Multiple Heavy Metal Concentrations among Housewives in Shanxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Xi Chen & Hua Zhong & Serena Yunran Zhang, 2022. "Local Ties, Trans-Local Ties, and Substance Use among Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Angdi Zhou & Xinru Li & Yiwen Song & Bingqin Hu & Yitong Chen & Peiyao Cui & Jinghua Li, 2023. "Academic Performance and Peer or Parental Tobacco Use among Non-Smoking Adolescents: Influence of Smoking Interactions on Intention to Smoke," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koksal, Aycan & Wohlgenant, Michael, 2013. "Pseudo Panel Data Estimation Technique and Rational Addiction Model: An Analysis of Tobacco, Alcohol and Coffee Demands," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150457, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Concetta CASTIGLIONE & Ladislava GROCHOVÁ & Davide INFANTE & Janna SMIRNOVA, 2011. "The demand for beer in presence of past consumption and advertising in the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(12), pages 589-599.
    3. Goel, Rajeev K. & Payne, James E. & Saunoris, James W., 2016. "Spillovers from the beer market to U.S. cigarette demand," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 292-297.
    4. Aycan Koksal & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 2016. "How do smoking bans in restaurants affect restaurant and at-home alcohol consumption?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1193-1213, June.
    5. Benjamin Ukert, 2017. "The short- and long-run effects of smoking cessation on alcohol consumption," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 495-519, December.
    6. Tauchmann, Harald & Lenz, Silja & Requate, Till & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2013. "Tobacco and alcohol: complements or substitutes?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 45(1), pages 539-566.
    7. David Aristei & Luca Pieroni, 2010. "Habits, Complementarities and Heterogeneity in Alcohol and Tobacco Demand: A Multivariate Dynamic Model," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 72(4), pages 428-457, August.
    8. Koksal, Aycan & Wohlgenant, Michael, 2013. "Interdependence of Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption: A Natural Experiment Approach," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150459, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Adrian R. Fleissig, 2020. "Impact of Casino Gambling and Lotteries on Demand for Other ‘Sin’ Goods," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 48(3), pages 327-338, September.
    10. Jaya Jumrani & P. S. Birthal, 2017. "Does consumption of tobacco and alcohol affect household food security? Evidence from rural India," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(2), pages 255-279, April.
    11. Tauchmann, Harald & Göhlmann, Silja & Requate, Till & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2007. "Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? – A Structural Model Approach," Ruhr Economic Papers 34, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    12. Fu, Shengfei & Florkowski, Wojciech, 2016. "Polish Household Consumption of Tobacco and Alcohol: A Censored System," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 229795, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    13. Aliaksandr Amialchuk & Kateryna Bornukova & Mir M. Ali, 2018. "Will a Decline in Smoking Increase Body Weights? Evidence from Belarus," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 44(2), pages 190-210, April.
    14. D. Dragone & D. Raggi, 2018. "Testing Rational Addiction: When Lifetime is Uncertain, One Lag is Enough," Working Papers wp1119, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    15. repec:zbw:rwirep:0064 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Jakub Čihák, 2020. "The effect of economic conditions on alcohol consumption," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 67(4), pages 481-497, December.
    17. Frooman, Jeff, 2021. "Where MLM Intersects MFA: Morally Suspect Goods and the Grounds for Regulatory Action," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 138-161, January.
    18. Ida, Takanori, 2010. "Anomaly, impulsivity, and addiction," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 194-203, April.
    19. Pu, Cheng-yun & Lan, Virginia & Chou, Yiing-Jenq & Lan, Chung-fu, 2008. "The crowding-out effects of tobacco and alcohol where expenditure shares are low: Analyzing expenditure data for Taiwan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1979-1989, May.
    20. Tauchmann, Harald & Göhlmann, Silja & Requate, Till & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2006. "Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? - A Statistical Guinea Pig Approach," RWI Discussion Papers 52, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    21. Pierpaolo Pierani & Silvia Tiezzi, 2009. "Addiction and interaction between alcohol and tobacco consumption," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:670-:d:719927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.