IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15774-d985594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China’s Trade of Agricultural Products Drives Substantial Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Meng

    (School of Management, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jinling Guo

    (School of Management, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Kejia Yan

    (School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Zhuan Yang

    (School of Management, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Bozi Li

    (School of Management, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Bo Zhang

    (School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Bin Chen

    (Fudan Tyndall Center, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

China’s trade of agricultural products has expanded rapidly over the past two decades, resulting in considerable shifts in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions worldwide. This study aims to explore the evolution of GHG emissions embodied in China’s trade of agricultural products from 1995 to 2015. The GHG emissions embodied in China’s exports of agricultural products experienced three stages of fluctuation, showing a significant upward trend (1995–2003), a fluctuating trend (2004–2007), and a fall back to the previous level (2008–2015). The embodied GHG emissions in China’s imports were witnessed at times of sustained growth, rising from 10.5 Mt CO 2 -eq in 1995 to 107.7 Mt CO 2 -eq in 2015. The net import of embodied GHG emissions has grown at an average annual rate of 25.1% since 2008. In terms of regional contribution, the distribution of China’s trading partners tended to be diversified. The increasing net imports of oil crops to China resulted in a significant GHG emissions shift from China to the US and Brazil. Asian countries contributed to 76.9% of the total GHG emissions embodied in China’s agricultural exports. The prominent impacts of China’s trade of agricultural products on global GHG emissions provide important implications for climate-related policy choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Meng & Jinling Guo & Kejia Yan & Zhuan Yang & Bozi Li & Bo Zhang & Bin Chen, 2022. "China’s Trade of Agricultural Products Drives Substantial Greenhouse Gas Emissions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15774-:d:985594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15774/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15774/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charlotte Janssens & Petr Havlík & Tamás Krisztin & Justin Baker & Stefan Frank & Tomoko Hasegawa & David Leclère & Sara Ohrel & Shaun Ragnauth & Erwin Schmid & Hugo Valin & Nicole Van Lipzig & Miet M, 2020. "Global hunger and climate change adaptation through international trade," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(9), pages 829-835, September.
    2. Mi, Zhifu & Zhang, Yunkun & Guan, Dabo & Shan, Yuli & Liu, Zhu & Cong, Ronggang & Yuan, Xiao-Chen & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2016. "Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1073-1081.
    3. Chen, B. & Yang, Q. & Li, J.S. & Chen, G.Q., 2017. "Decoupling analysis on energy consumption, embodied GHG emissions and economic growth — The case study of Macao," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 662-672.
    4. Hajer Ammar & Sourour Abidi & Mediha Ayed & Nizar Moujahed & Mario E. deHaro Martí & Mireille Chahine & Rachid Bouraoui & Secundino López & Hatem Cheikh M’hamed & Haikel Hechlef, 2020. "Estimation of Tunisian Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Different Livestock Species," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Li, Y.L. & Chen, B. & Chen, G.Q., 2020. "Carbon network embodied in international trade: Global structural evolution and its policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Xiao-Tong Wang & Huan Liu & Zhao-Feng Lv & Fan-Yuan Deng & Hai-Lian Xu & Li-Juan Qi & Meng-Shuang Shi & Jun-Chao Zhao & Song-Xin Zheng & Han-Yang Man & Ke-Bin He, 2021. "Trade-linked shipping CO2 emissions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(11), pages 945-951, November.
    7. Wiedmann, Thomas & Lenzen, Manfred & Turner, Karen & Barrett, John, 2007. "Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities -- Part 2: Review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 15-26, February.
    8. Jiajia Li & Abbas Ali Chandio & Yucong Liu, 2020. "Trade Impacts on Embodied Carbon Emissions—Evidence from the Bilateral Trade between China and Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Marco Springmann & Michael Clark & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Keith Wiebe & Benjamin Leon Bodirsky & Luis Lassaletta & Wim Vries & Sonja J. Vermeulen & Mario Herrero & Kimberly M. Carlson & Malin Jonell & , 2018. "Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7728), pages 519-525, October.
    10. Zhen, Wei & Qin, Quande & Qian, Xiaoying & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2018. "Inequality across China's Staple Crops in Energy Consumption and Related GHG Emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 17-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yilin & Chen, Bin & Li, Chaohui & Li, Zhi & Chen, Guoqian, 2020. "Energy perspective of Sino-US trade imbalance in global supply chains," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Tang, Miaohan & Hong, Jingke & Liu, Guiwen & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping, 2019. "Exploring energy flows embodied in China's economy from the regional and sectoral perspectives via combination of multi-regional input–output analysis and a complex network approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1191-1201.
    3. Haoran Wang & Toshiyuki Fujita, 2023. "A Review of Research on Embodied Carbon in International Trade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Li, Jia Shuo & Zhou, H.W. & Meng, Jing & Yang, Q. & Chen, B. & Zhang, Y.Y., 2018. "Carbon emissions and their drivers for a typical urban economy from multiple perspectives: A case analysis for Beijing city," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1076-1086.
    5. J. Verschuur & E. E. Koks & J. W. Hall, 2022. "Ports’ criticality in international trade and global supply-chains," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Zhong, Zhangqi & Guo, Zhifang & Zhang, Jianwu, 2021. "Does the participation in global value chains promote interregional carbon emissions transferring via trade? Evidence from 39 major economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Hehua Zhao & Hongwen Chen & Lei He, 2022. "Embodied Carbon Emissions and Regional Transfer Characteristics—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Jiang, Lei & He, Shixiong & Zhong, Zhangqi & Zhou, Haifeng & He, Lingyun, 2019. "Revisiting environmental kuznets curve for carbon dioxide emissions: The role of trade," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 245-257.
    9. Fang, Delin & Chen, Bin, 2019. "Information-based ecological network analysis for carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 45-53.
    10. Ou, Jiamin & Meng, Jing & Zheng, Junyu & Mi, Zhifu & Bian, Yahui & Yu, Xiang & Liu, Jingru & Guan, Dabo, 2017. "Demand-driven air pollutant emissions for a fast-developing region in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 131-142.
    11. Chen, B. & Li, J.S. & Wu, X.F. & Han, M.Y. & Zeng, L. & Li, Z. & Chen, G.Q., 2018. "Global energy flows embodied in international trade: A combination of environmentally extended input–output analysis and complex network analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 98-107.
    12. Zhangqi Zhong & Xu Zhang & Weina Gao, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Transferring via Trade: Influencing Factors and Policy Implications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-24, July.
    13. Chen, B. & Yang, Q. & Zhou, Sili & Li, J.S. & Chen, G.Q., 2017. "Urban economy's carbon flow through external trade: Spatial-temporal evolution for Macao," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 69-78.
    14. Shao, Ling & Li, Yuan & Feng, Kuishuang & Meng, Jing & Shan, Yuli & Guan, Dabo, 2018. "Carbon emission imbalances and the structural paths of Chinese regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 396-404.
    15. Zhu, Yongbin & Shi, Yajuan & Wu, Jing & Wu, Leying & Xiong, Wen, 2018. "Exploring the Characteristics of CO2 Emissions Embodied in International Trade and the Fair Share of Responsibility," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 574-587.
    16. Zhangqi, Zhong & Zhuli, Chen & Lingyun, He, 2022. "Technological innovation, industrial structural change and carbon emission transferring via trade-------An agent-based modeling approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    17. Zhang, Kun & Xue, Mei-Mei & Feng, Kuishuang & Liang, Qiao-Mei, 2019. "The economic effects of carbon tax on China’s provinces," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 784-802.
    18. Tianrui Wang & Yu Chen & Leya Zeng, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution Analysis of Carbon Emissions Embodied in Inter-Provincial Trade in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-26, June.
    19. Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Rhys Manners, 2020. "Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Vermunt, D.A. & Wojtynia, N. & Hekkert, M.P. & Van Dijk, J. & Verburg, R. & Verweij, P.A. & Wassen, M. & Runhaar, H., 2022. "Five mechanisms blocking the transition towards ‘nature-inclusive’ agriculture: A systemic analysis of Dutch dairy farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15774-:d:985594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.