IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15286-d977583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Response of Ecosystem Service Value to Urbanization in Fragile Vegetation Areas Based on Terrain Gradient

Author

Listed:
  • Ji Zhang

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
    Organization Department of the Shannan Municipal Committee of the CPC, Shannan 856099, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zelin Liu

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yu Shi

    (College of the Life and Environmental Science, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Ziying Zou

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

Abstract

The contradiction between urban expansion and ecological protection in fragile vegetation areas has become increasingly prominent with regional development. Revealing the relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services will help to provide solutions to this problem. In order to clarify the impact of urbanization on typical mountain areas with fragile vegetation on the Qinghai Tibet Plateau, we built an ecosystem service value (ESV) evaluation index system. We also evaluated the ESV and its spatial response to the urbanization of Shannan Prefecture in Tibet from 1990 to 2015 based on different terrain gradients (TGs) using vegetation biophysical data obtained from remote sensing platforms. The results show that ESV in Shannan increased first and then declined as the TG increased, reaching a maximum value at the third TG. ESV showed a decreased trend during the study period, with a significant decline at the second and third TGs, which were the main distribution areas of vegetation in Shannan. Through spatial correlation analysis, we observed that urbanization and ESV showed a significant spatial aggregation effect. Among them, the high–low type accounted for the largest proportion in the grid with the agglomeration effect, mainly concentrated at the lower TG in the southern of Shannan, where ESV decreases with the increasing urbanization. We highlight the need for targeted, sustainable development policies to rationally organize the urbanization process in the different-gradient plateau regions with fragile vegetation. These results can provide a reference for applying ESV to vegetation restoration and ecological protection in ecologically fragile mountain areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji Zhang & Zelin Liu & Yu Shi & Ziying Zou, 2022. "Spatial Response of Ecosystem Service Value to Urbanization in Fragile Vegetation Areas Based on Terrain Gradient," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15286-:d:977583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul R. Ehrlich & Peter M. Kareiva & Gretchen C. Daily, 2012. "Securing natural capital and expanding equity to rescale civilization," Nature, Nature, vol. 486(7401), pages 68-73, June.
    2. Yu Shi & Rui Han & Luo Guo, 2020. "Temporal–Spatial Distribution of Ecosystem Health and Its Response to Human Interference Based on Different Terrain Gradients: A Case Study in Gannan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Ru Chen & Chunbo Huang, 2021. "Landscape Evolution and It’s Impact of Ecosystem Service Value of the Wuhan City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Pedro V. Amaral & Luc Anselin, 2014. "Finite sample properties of Moran's I test for spatial autocorrelation in tobit models," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(4), pages 773-781, November.
    5. Xinyu Zhang & Huawei Li & Hua Xia & Guohang Tian & Yuxing Yin & Yakai Lei & Gunwoo Kim, 2021. "The Ecosystem Services Value Change and Its Driving Forces Responding to Spatio-Temporal Process of Landscape Pattern in the Co-Urbanized Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Lyu, Rongfang & Zhang, Jianming & Xu, Mengqun & Li, Jijun, 2018. "Impacts of urbanization on ecosystem services and their temporal relations: A case study in Northern Ningxia, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 163-173.
    7. Wenbo Cai & Wei Jiang & Yongli Cai, 2021. "Developing an Ecosystem Services-Based Approach for Land Use Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Pengyan & Yang, Dan & Qin, Mingzhou & Jing, Wenlong, 2020. "Spatial heterogeneity analysis and driving forces exploring of built-up land development intensity in Chinese prefecture-level cities and implications for future Urban Land intensive use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Srijana Shrestha & Khem Narayan Poudyal & Nawraj Bhattarai & Mohan B. Dangi & John J. Boland, 2022. "An Assessment of the Impact of Land Use and Land Cover Change on the Degradation of Ecosystem Service Values in Kathmandu Valley Using Remote Sensing and GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Zhao, Ziyang & Wang, Hongrui & Wang, Cheng & Li, Wangcheng & Chen, Hao & Deng, Caiyun, 2020. "Changes in reference evapotranspiration over Northwest China from 1957 to 2018: Variation characteristics, cause analysis and relationships with atmospheric circulation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Mônica Bahia Schlee & Kenneth R. Tamminga & Vera Regina Tangari, 2012. "A Method for Gauging Landscape Change as a Prelude to Urban Watershed Regeneration: The Case of the Carioca River, Rio de Janeiro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-45, August.
    5. Wu, Ye & Tao, Yu & Yang, Guishan & Ou, Weixin & Pueppke, Steven & Sun, Xiao & Chen, Gongtai & Tao, Qin, 2019. "Impact of land use change on multiple ecosystem services in the rapidly urbanizing Kunshan City of China: Past trajectories and future projections," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 419-427.
    6. Bettina Bahn-Walkowiak & Sören Steger, 2015. "Resource Targets in Europe and Worldwide: An Overview," Resources, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Arto O. Salonen & Jani Siirilä & Mikko Valtonen, 2018. "Sustainable Living in Finland: Combating Climate Change in Everyday Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Lorilla, Roxanne Suzette & Poirazidis, Konstantinos & Detsis, Vassilis & Kalogirou, Stamatis & Chalkias, Christos, 2020. "Socio-ecological determinants of multiple ecosystem services on the Mediterranean landscapes of the Ionian Islands (Greece)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 422(C).
    9. Hengyu Pan & Yong Geng & Ji Han & Cheng Huang & Wenyi Han & Zhuang Miao, 2020. "Emergy Based Decoupling Analysis of Ecosystem Services on Urbanization: A Case of Shanghai, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    10. Xinyan Zou & Chen Wang & Xiang Que & Xiaogang Ma & Zhe Wang & Quanli Fu & Yuting Lai & Xinhan Zhuang, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Heterogeneous Responses of Ecosystem Services to Landscape Patterns in Urban–Suburban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Xingjia Wang & Dongyan Wang & Wanying Gao & Jiaxi Lu & Xiaotong Jin, 2022. "Investigation of Spatial Coupling Coordination Development: Identifying Land System States from the Adaptation–Conflict Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Shaofeng Yuan & Congmou Zhu & Lixia Yang & Fenghua Xie, 2019. "Responses of Ecosystem Services to Urbanization-Induced Land Use Changes in Ecologically Sensitive Suburban Areas in Hangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Eunjoung Lee & Gunwoo Kim, 2023. "Green Space Ecosystem Services and Value Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Roads for Sustainable Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Kvamsdal, Sturla F. & Sandal, Leif K. & Poudel, Diwakar, 2020. "Ecosystem wealth in the Barents Sea," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    15. Iñigo Capellán-Pérez & David Álvarez-Antelo & Luis J. Miguel, 2019. "Global Sustainability Crossroads : A Participatory Simulation Game to Educate in the Energy and Sustainability Challenges of the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-23, July.
    16. Wenbo Cai & Wei Jiang & Hongyu Du & Ruishan Chen & Yongli Cai, 2021. "Assessing Ecosystem Services Supply-Demand (Mis)Matches for Differential City Management in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Fleischer, Aliza & Felsenstein, Daniel & Lichter, Michal, 2018. "A Spatially Accurate Method for Evaluating Distributional Effects of Ecosystem Services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 451-460.
    18. Yi Xiao & Luo Guo & Weiguo Sang, 2020. "Impact of Fast Urbanization on Ecosystem Health in Mountainous Regions of Southwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Atsushi Iimi & Liangzhi You & Ulrike Wood-Sichra, 2020. "Spatial Autocorrelation Panel Regression: Agricultural Production and Transport Connectivity," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 529-547, June.
    20. Ruckelshaus, Mary & McKenzie, Emily & Tallis, Heather & Guerry, Anne & Daily, Gretchen & Kareiva, Peter & Polasky, Stephen & Ricketts, Taylor & Bhagabati, Nirmal & Wood, Spencer A. & Bernhardt, Joanna, 2015. "Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 11-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15286-:d:977583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.