IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p505-d1072631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Space Ecosystem Services and Value Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Roads for Sustainable Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Eunjoung Lee

    (Graduate School of Urban Studies, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Gunwoo Kim

    (Graduate School of Urban Studies, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The provision of green space as a result of three-dimensional roads plays a crucial role in maintaining the sustainability of the urban ecosystem. It does so by solving environmental problems and offering various ecosystem services to city residents. This study focuses on the park section of an expressway located between Bundang and Suseo in Seongnam city, South Korea, and quantifies the improvement in air quality and ecological value following the transformation of the road into green infrastructure. The goal is to determine the feasibility of sustainable green infrastructure for roads. The new park area on the road is approximately 83,000 sq. meters and there are approximately 3349 trees planted in the park. These trees can store 77.68 metric tons of carbon annually, isolate 13.21 metric tons of total carbon, remove 70.446 kg of air pollutants, avoid 112.8 cubic meters of emissions, and mitigate 31,983.90 cubic feet of emissions. The resulting economic value is approximately 874,494 dollars. Road green infrastructure conversion can be a useful solution to respond to environmental problems. To promote decision-making when developing policies, a process of pre-verification with quantified data of ecosystem services (example: air quality benefits, etc.) of trees using the i-Tree Eco program is required. In the execution stage, it is possible to understand the structure, function, and value of green spaces and prepare guidelines for tree selection, design alternatives, and evaluation as one of the management strategies for green spaces to improve the value of ecosystem services.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunjoung Lee & Gunwoo Kim, 2023. "Green Space Ecosystem Services and Value Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Roads for Sustainable Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:505-:d:1072631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/505/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/505/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jisoo Sim & Cermetrius Lynell Bohannon & Patrick Miller, 2019. "What Park Visitors Survey Tells Us: Comparing Three Elevated Parks—The High Line, 606, and High Bridge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Cortinovis, Chiara & Geneletti, Davide, 2018. "Ecosystem services in urban plans: What is there, and what is still needed for better decisions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 298-312.
    3. Lyu, Rongfang & Zhang, Jianming & Xu, Mengqun & Li, Jijun, 2018. "Impacts of urbanization on ecosystem services and their temporal relations: A case study in Northern Ningxia, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 163-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Angela Pilogallo & Francesco Scorza & Beniamino Murgante, 2024. "Ecosystem Services-Based City Ranking in Italy: A Tool to Enhance Sustainable Thinking in Regeneration Strategies," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eunjoung Lee & Gunwoo Kim, 2022. "Analysis of Domestic and International Green Infrastructure Research Trends from the ESG Perspective in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Nijhum, Farzana & Westbrook, Cherie & Noble, Bram & Belcher, Ken & Lloyd-Smith, Patrick, 2021. "Evaluation of alternative land-use scenarios using an ecosystem services-based strategic environmental assessment approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Zhang, Pengyan & Yang, Dan & Qin, Mingzhou & Jing, Wenlong, 2020. "Spatial heterogeneity analysis and driving forces exploring of built-up land development intensity in Chinese prefecture-level cities and implications for future Urban Land intensive use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Tandarić, Neven & Ives, Christopher D. & Watkins, Charles, 2022. "From city in the park to “greenery in plant pots”: The influence of socialist and post-socialist planning on opportunities for cultural ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Adams, Clare & Frantzeskaki, Niki & Moglia, Magnus, 2023. "Mainstreaming nature-based solutions in cities: A systematic literature review and a proposal for facilitating urban transitions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    6. González-García, Alberto & Palomo, Ignacio & González, José A. & López, César A. & Montes, Carlos, 2020. "Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    7. Antonio Ledda & Marta Kubacka & Giovanna Calia & Sylwia Bródka & Vittorio Serra & Andrea De Montis, 2023. "Italy vs. Poland: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Planning System Attitudes toward Adaptation to Climate Changes and Green Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Martí, Pablo & García-Mayor, Clara & Nolasco-Cirugeda, Almudena & Serrano-Estrada, Leticia, 2020. "Green infrastructure planning: Unveiling meaningful spaces through Foursquare users’ preferences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Shaofeng Yuan & Congmou Zhu & Lixia Yang & Fenghua Xie, 2019. "Responses of Ecosystem Services to Urbanization-Induced Land Use Changes in Ecologically Sensitive Suburban Areas in Hangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    10. De Valck, Jeremy & Beames, Alistair & Liekens, Inge & Bettens, Maarten & Seuntjens, Piet & Broekx, Steven, 2019. "Valuing urban ecosystem services in sustainable brownfield redevelopment," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 139-149.
    11. Klimanova, O.A. & Bukvareva, E.N. & Yu, Kolbowsky E. & Illarionova, O.A., 2023. "Assessing ecosystem services in Russia: Case studies from four municipal districts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Esra Kut Görgün & Stefano Salata, 2025. "Settlement Expansion Versus Environmental Protection: Ecosystem Services for Environmental Regulation Planning in Izmir, Turkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Calzolari, C. & Tarocco, P. & Lombardo, N. & Marchi, N. & Ungaro, F., 2020. "Assessing soil ecosystem services in urban and peri-urban areas: From urban soils survey to providing support tool for urban planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Harald Zepp & Luis Inostroza, 2021. "Who Pays the Bill? Assessing Ecosystem Services Losses in an Urban Planning Context," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Chen, Wanxu & Chi, Guangqing & Li, Jiangfeng, 2020. "The spatial aspect of ecosystem services balance and its determinants," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    16. Li, Sijia & Wang, Jinman & Zhang, Min & Tang, Qian, 2021. "Characterizing and attributing the vegetation coverage changes in North Shanxi coal base of China from 1987 to 2020," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    17. Rodrigo Cuevas-Wizner & Antonio Ledda & Belén Martín & Emilio Ortega & Giovanna Calia & Andrea De Montis, 2024. "Mainstreaming Adaptation to Climate Changes: A Comparison between Sardinia, Italy and Valencia, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-26, August.
    18. Zhipeng Yang & Shijun Wang & Meng Guo & Junfeng Tian & Yingjie Zhang, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Territorial Space Development Intensity and Its Habitat Quality Response in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Bilyana Borisova & Lidiya Semerdzhieva & Stelian Dimitrov & Stoyan Valchev & Martin Iliev & Kristian Georgiev, 2024. "Geospatial Prioritization of Terrains for “Greening” Urban Infrastructure," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Qiangqiang Yang & Pian Zhang & Xiaocong Qiu & Guanglai Xu & Jianyu Chi, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Variations and Trade-Offs of Ecosystem Services in Anhui Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:505-:d:1072631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.