IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3260-d1375281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Heterogeneous Responses of Ecosystem Services to Landscape Patterns in Urban–Suburban Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyan Zou

    (College of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Chen Wang

    (Fujian Geologic Surveying and Mapping Institute, Fuzhou 350000, China)

  • Xiang Que

    (College of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    Department of Computer Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA)

  • Xiaogang Ma

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA)

  • Zhe Wang

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA)

  • Quanli Fu

    (College of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    Fujian Statistical Information Research Center, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Yuting Lai

    (College of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    Fujian Statistical Information Research Center, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Xinhan Zhuang

    (College of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    Fujian Statistical Information Research Center, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

With the acceleration of urbanization, the ecosystem around cities is facing severe challenges. The drastic changes in the landscape pattern, especially in urban–suburban areas, are usually regarded as one of the main drivers. However, the spatiotemporal heterogeneous impacts of landscape patterns on the ecosystem services in this region remain unclear. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework integrating the InVEST-based ecosystem service assessment and spatiotemporal weighted regression (STWR)-based analysis of the spatiotemporal heterogeneity in urban–suburban areas, and apply it to the empirical study of Fuzhou City from 2000 to 2020. It first utilized the InVEST model to build a comprehensive ecosystem service index (CES) from five aspects (i.e., habitat quality, carbon storage, water yield, soil retention, and water purification capacity). Then, four landscape pattern indices (LPIs) (i.e., patch density (PD), area-weighted mean fractal dimension (FRAC_AM), splitting (SPLIT), and Shannon’s diversity (SHDI) index) were selected to build the STWR model. We compared and analyzed the differences in the spatial coefficient surfaces and significance tests generated by the STWR model in urban, urban–suburban, and rural areas. Results show that the following: (1) The CES in Fuzhou shows an upward trend from the urban area to the urban–suburban and rural areas, with significant gradient differences. (2) Compared with other areas, the LPIs in urban–suburban areas show more fragmentation, discreteness, and diversity, indicating more socioeconomic activities. (3) Although LPIs’ impacts on CES change over time (increasing from 2005 to 2010 and 2020 but decreasing in 2015), their effects are relatively low in urban–suburban areas, significantly lower than in urban areas. (4) Interestingly, the LPI coefficients near the urban–suburban boundary seem more significant. (5) This framework can effectively reveal the spatiotemporal heterogeneous relationships between various LPIs and CES, thus guiding concrete policies and measures that support decision-making for improving the ecosystem services surrounding cities through shaping landscape patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyan Zou & Chen Wang & Xiang Que & Xiaogang Ma & Zhe Wang & Quanli Fu & Yuting Lai & Xinhan Zhuang, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Heterogeneous Responses of Ecosystem Services to Landscape Patterns in Urban–Suburban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3260-:d:1375281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3260/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3260/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pulighe, Giuseppe & Fava, Francesco & Lupia, Flavio, 2016. "Insights and opportunities from mapping ecosystem services of urban green spaces and potentials in planning," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 1-10.
    2. Xinyu Zhang & Huawei Li & Hua Xia & Guohang Tian & Yuxing Yin & Yakai Lei & Gunwoo Kim, 2021. "The Ecosystem Services Value Change and Its Driving Forces Responding to Spatio-Temporal Process of Landscape Pattern in the Co-Urbanized Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Feiyan Zhang & Yonggang Gao, 2023. "Study on Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Fuzhou Built-Up Area Based on Remote Sensing Data of Nighttime Light," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Luwen Liu & Xingrong Chen & Wanxu Chen & Xinyue Ye, 2020. "Identifying the Impact of Landscape Pattern on Ecosystem Services in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-26, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuting Lai & Tingting Fei & Chen Wang & Xiaoying Xu & Xinhan Zhuang & Xiang Que & Yanjiao Zhang & Wenli Yuan & Haohao Yang & Yu Hong, 2025. "Energy Carbon Emission Reduction Based on Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity: A County-Level Empirical Analysis in Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bolaños-Valencia, Ingrid & Villegas-Palacio, Clara & López-Gómez, Connie Paola & Berrouet, Lina & Ruiz, Aura, 2019. "Social perception of risk in socio-ecological systems. A qualitative and quantitative analysis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Qian Zuo & Yong Zhou & Jingyi Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization Strategy of an Ecological Network in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in Southwestern Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Ruiqi Zhang & Chunguang Hu & Yucheng Sun, 2024. "Decoding the Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and the Scale Effect in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomeration: Insights for Planning and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Mihai-Razvan Niță & Ana-Maria Anghel & Cristina Bănescu & Ana-Maria Munteanu & Sabina-Stella Pesamosca & Mihuț Zețu & Ana-Maria Popa, 2018. "Are Romanian urban strategies planning for green?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 158-173, January.
    5. Teodoro Semeraro & Roberta Aretano & Amilcare Barca & Alessandro Pomes & Cecilia Del Giudice & Elisa Gatto & Marcello Lenucci & Riccardo Buccolieri & Rohinton Emmanuel & Zhi Gao & Alessandra Scognamig, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Design Green Infrastructure: Ecosystem Services as an Opportunity for Creating Shared Value in Ground Photovoltaic Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-28, July.
    6. Vallejo-Borda, Jose Agustin & Barchelot-Aceros, Laura Juliana & Barrero, German A. & Ortiz-Ramirez, Hernan Alberto & Pabón-Poches, Daysy Katherine & Silva-Fernández, Claudia Susana, 2023. "Addressing pedestrian perceived externalities influenced by motor vehicles: A perspective from curb space typologies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Chen, Chundi & Wang, Yuncai & Jia, Junsong & Mao, Longfei & Meurk, Colin D., 2019. "Ecosystem services mapping in practice: A Pasteur’s quadrant perspective," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    8. John R. Taylor & Mamatha Hanumappa & Lara Miller & Brendan Shane & Matthew L. Richardson, 2021. "Facilitating Multifunctional Green Infrastructure Planning in Washington, DC through a Tableau Interface," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Xichen Ge & Liang Sun & Jiongzhen Chen & Shuangrong Cai, 2022. "Land Utilization, Landscape Pattern, and Ecological Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of Discrimination and Overlap from Suining, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Damien Sinonmatohou Tiando & Shougeng Hu & Xin Fan & Muhammad Rashid Ali, 2021. "Tropical Coastal Land-Use and Land Cover Changes Impact on Ecosystem Service Value during Rapid Urbanization of Benin, West Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Abramowicz Dawid & Stępniewska Małgorzata, 2020. "Public Investment Policy as a Driver of Changes in the Ecosystem Services Delivery by an Urban Green Infrastructure," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(1), pages 5-18, March.
    12. Teodoro Semeraro & Benedetta Radicchio & Pietro Medagli & Stefano Arzeni & Alessio Turco & Davide Geneletti, 2020. "Integration of Ecosystem Services in Strategic Environmental Assessment of a Peri-Urban Development Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Weixuan Wei & Yiqi Wang & Qi Yan & Guanpeng Liu & Nannan Dong, 2024. "Assessing Buffer Gradient Synergies: Comparing Objective and Subjective Evaluations of Urban Park Ecosystem Services in Century Park, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-33, November.
    14. Sharma, Reena & Bakshi, Bhavik R. & Ramteke, Manojkumar & Kodamana, Hariprasad, 2024. "Quantifying ecosystem services from trees by using i-tree with low-resolution satellite images," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Weiping Tang & Zhengjia Niu & Zili Wei & Liandong Zhu, 2022. "Sustainable Development of Eco-Cities: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Calderón-Contreras, Rafael & Quiroz-Rosas, Laura Elisa, 2017. "Analysing scale, quality and diversity of green infrastructure and the provision of Urban Ecosystem Services: A case from Mexico City," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 127-137.
    17. Carina Júlia Pensa Corrêa & Ernest O. Nnadi & Fredrick U. Mbanaso & Kelly Cristina Tonello, 2022. "Urban Gardens’ Potential to Improve Stormwater Management: A Comparative Analysis among Urban Soils in Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, March.
    18. Yi Liu & Mingdong Zang & Jianbing Peng & Yuze Bai & Siyuan Wang & Zibin Wang & Peidong Shi & Miao Liu & Kairan Xu & Ning Zhang, 2025. "Analysis of Ecosystem Pattern Evolution and Driving Forces in the Qin River Basin in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Fernández, Ignacio C., 2019. "A multiple-class distance-decaying approach for mapping temperature reduction ecosystem services provided by urban vegetation in Santiago de Chile," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 193-201.
    20. Linrun Qiu & Yuxiang Dong & Hai Liu, 2022. "Integrating Ecosystem Services into Planning Practice: Situation, Challenges and Inspirations," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3260-:d:1375281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.