IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12340-d927813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Fear and Humor Appeals in Public Service Announcements (PSAs) on Intentions to Purchase Medications via Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Saleem Alhabash

    (Department of Advertising and Public Relations, College of Communication Arts, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

  • Yao Dong

    (Department of Advertising and Public Relations, College of Communication Arts, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

  • Charlotte Moureaud

    (AbbVie, 1 N. Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA)

  • Iago S. Muraro

    (Department of Advertising and Public Relations, College of Communication Arts, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

  • John B. Hertig

    (Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Butler University, Indianapolis, IN 46208, USA)

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of online purchase of medications, specifically via social media platforms, poses significant health risks due to high chances of such medications being substandard and falsified (SF). The current study uses a 2 (persuasive appeal: fear vs. humor) x 3 (message repetition) mixed factorial experiment to investigate the effectiveness of persuasive appeals (on intentions to purchase medications online via social media referrals, mediated by psychological reactance (threat to freedom and anger), attitudes toward the public service announcements (PSAs), and viral behavioral intentions. ANOVA results showed the superiority of humor appeals compared to fear appeals in (1) reducing psychological reactance, (2) igniting favorable responses to the PSA, and (3) marginally reducing the intentions to purchase medications vial social media despite lower online engagement intentions (viral behavioral intentions). Pre-existing risk perceptions moderated these differences. A moderated serial mediation model, conducted using PROCESS models, was examined to assess the mechanism by which persuasive appeals and risk perceptions interact in influencing purchase intentions. Findings are discussed theoretically in regard to extending the psychological reactance model within the digital environment and practically in terms of public health, brand protection, and law enforcement recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Saleem Alhabash & Yao Dong & Charlotte Moureaud & Iago S. Muraro & John B. Hertig, 2022. "Effects of Fear and Humor Appeals in Public Service Announcements (PSAs) on Intentions to Purchase Medications via Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12340-:d:927813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12340/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12340/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berman, Barry, 2008. "Strategies to detect and reduce counterfeiting activity," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 191-199.
    2. Lammers, H. Bruce & Leibowitz, Laura & Seymour, George Edw. & Hennessey, Judith E., 1983. "Humor and cognitive responses to advertising stimuli: A trace consolidation approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 173-185, June.
    3. Jeremy M. Wilson & Clifford A. Grammich, 2021. "Protecting brands from counterfeiting risks: tactics of a total business solution," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 1141-1160, November.
    4. Norman C. H. Wong & Kylie J. Harrison & Lindsey A. Harvell, 2015. "Reactance and Public Health Messages: The Unintended Dangers of Anti-tobacco PSAs," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 72-83, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hameed, Irfan & Zainab, Bibi & Shamim, Syed Jazib, 2018. "Arousal Safety Leading to Purchase Intention; The Role of Moderating and Mediating Variables in Structural Model," MPRA Paper 91848, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Wilson, Jeremy M. & Grammich, Clifford A., 2020. "Brand protection across the enterprise: Toward a total-business solution," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 363-376.
    3. Michele POSTIGLIOLA, 2016. "Donatella Strangio & Giuseppe Sancetta (Eds.), Italy in a European Context: Research in Business, Economics, and the Environment," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 201-204, March.
    4. Crawford, Heather J. & Gregory, Gary D., 2015. "Humorous advertising that travels: A review and call for research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 569-577.
    5. Jingyu Li & Anding Zhu & Dongsheng Liu & Wenmin Zhao & Yi Zhou & Yahui Chen & Yanni Liu & Nan Sun, 2020. "Sustainability of China’s Singles Day Shopping Festivals: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Fairness Atmospherics on Consumers’ Continuance Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Li, Ling, 2013. "Technology designed to combat fakes in the global supply chain," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 167-177.
    7. John A. Narcum & Joshua T. Coleman, 2015. "You can`t fool me! Or can you? Assimilation and contrast effects on consumers` evaluations of product authenticity in the online environment," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(9), pages 200-207, September.
    8. Simona Romani & Giacomo Gistri & Stefano Pace, 2012. "When counterfeits raise the appeal of luxury brands," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 807-824, September.
    9. Priporas, Constantinos-Vasilios & Chen, Yan & Zhao, Shasha & Tan, Hui, 2020. "An exploratory study of the upper middle-class consumer attitudes towards counterfeiting in China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    10. Meraviglia, Laura, 2018. "Technology and counterfeiting in the fashion industry: Friends or foes?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 467-475.
    11. Abraham Yeboah & Vida Owusu-Prempeh & Samuel Adjei, 2017. "The Influence of Offline, Online Media and Counterfeit Awareness among Non-Perishable and Non-Food Products in Ghana," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 31-42, December.
    12. Nill, Alexander & Shultz II, Clifford J., 2009. "Global software piracy: Trends and strategic considerations," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 289-298, May.
    13. Elton Beqiraj & Silvia Fedeli & Luisa Giuriato, 2019. "How do organized crime and counterfeit interact in Italian trading firms? An empirical analysis of their effects on trade," Working Papers in Public Economics 187, University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Economics and Law.
    14. Qin, Yao & Shi, Linda Hui & Song, Lei & Stöttinger, Barbara & Tan, Kang (Frank), 2018. "Integrating consumers’ motives with suppliers’ solutions to combat Shanzhai: A phenomenon beyond counterfeit," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 229-237.
    15. Dharun Kasilingam & Soundararaj Ajitha, 2022. "Storytelling in advertisements: understanding the effect of humor and drama on the attitude toward brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 341-362, July.
    16. Nelson Borges Amaral, 2020. "What can be done to address luxury counterfeiting? An integrative review of tactics and strategies," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(6), pages 691-709, November.
    17. Cesareo, Ludovica & Stöttinger, Barbara, 2015. "United we stand, divided we fall: How firms can engage consumers in their fight against counterfeits," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 527-537.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12340-:d:927813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.