IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11492-d669619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sense of Coherence in Managers during COVID-19 and the New World of Work: A Mixed-Method Study

Author

Listed:
  • Claude-Hélène Mayer

    (Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Cemonn Wegerle

    (Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Rudolf M. Oosthuizen

    (Department of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, School of Management Sciences, College of Economic and Management Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0003, South Africa)

Abstract

During COVID-19, the working world has changed inevitably, and many managers experience extreme strain and stress. This study determines how managers cope with the changes during COVID-19 from a positive psychology and salutogenic perspective. It employs a hermeneutical research design and an interpretivist paradigm by using a mixed-method research approach in which managers’ sense of coherence (SOC) is investigated quantitatively through the 29-item Life-Orientation scale and qualitatively through semi-structured interviews. Purposeful and snowball sampling techniques are used. The sample consists of 17 managers. Data were collected in different organizations within South Africa and analysed through content analysis, linking quantitative and qualitative data in a holistic, integrated and complex way. In terms of the quantitative findings, the managers scored at the medium and higher end of the SOC-scale in comprehensibility, followed by manageability and finally meaningfulness. Male managers in the age group 47–57 scored highest. Female and younger managers scored lower on average. Lowest scores in comprehensibility and manageability were scored by a young female manager, while in meaningfulness the oldest male participant scored lowest. The qualitative findings show that high scoring SOC managers apply complex thoughts to the present and future workplace scenario. Individuals with lower SOC scores do not present as much knowledge, complex thinking and argumentation structures during the interview in comprehensibility scores as high scoring SOC managers, yet still acquire resources to manage the workplace (manageability). High meaningfulness scores are associated with creating meaningful workplace interaction (human–human and machine–human), knowledge distribution through technology, impactfulness, experiencing the job as meaningful, including helping others, and achievements. Managers have a complex view of the world and findings show the complex connections of a high/low SOC scores and the managers’ explorations and systemic understanding regarding their managerial world. Conclusions and recommendations for theory and practice are given.

Suggested Citation

  • Claude-Hélène Mayer & Cemonn Wegerle & Rudolf M. Oosthuizen, 2021. "Sense of Coherence in Managers during COVID-19 and the New World of Work: A Mixed-Method Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11492-:d:669619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11492/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11492/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roos, Patrick & Gelfand, Michele & Nau, Dana & Lun, Janetta, 2015. "Societal threat and cultural variation in the strength of social norms: An evolutionary basis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 14-23.
    2. Antonovsky, Aaron, 1993. "Complexity, conflict, chaos, coherence, coercion and civility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 969-974, October.
    3. Juan Gómez-Salgado & Sara Domínguez-Salas & Macarena Romero-Martín & Mónica Ortega-Moreno & Juan Jesús García-Iglesias & Carlos Ruiz-Frutos, 2020. "Sense of Coherence and Psychological Distress Among Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1, August.
    4. Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan & Tortorella, Guilherme, 2021. "Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on employee performance – Moderating role of industry 4.0 base technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    5. Giuseppe Michele Masanotti & Silvia Paolucci & Elia Abbafati & Claudio Serratore & Michela Caricato, 2020. "Sense of Coherence in Nurses: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Jeremy Mitonga-Monga & Claude-Hélène Mayer, 2020. "Sense of Coherence, Burnout, and Work Engagement: The Moderating Effect of Coping in the Democratic Republic of Congo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orna Braun-Lewensohn & Claude-Hélène Mayer, 2020. "Salutogenesis and Coping: Ways to Overcome Stress and Conflict," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-6, September.
    2. Mia M. Vainio & Daiva Daukantaitė, 2016. "Grit and Different Aspects of Well-Being: Direct and Indirect Relationships via Sense of Coherence and Authenticity," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 2119-2147, October.
    3. Joshua Conrad Jackson & Marieke van Egmond & Virginia K Choi & Carol R Ember & Jamin Halberstadt & Jovana Balanovic & Inger N Basker & Klaus Boehnke & Noemi Buki & Ronald Fischer & Marta Fulop & Ashle, 2019. "Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Federico Contu & Daniela Di Santo & Conrad Baldner & Antonio Pierro, 2023. "Examining the Interaction between Perceived Cultural Tightness and Prevention Regulatory Focus on Life Satisfaction in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-10, January.
    5. Bamieh, Omar & Cintolesi, Andrea, 2021. "Intergenerational transmission in regulated professions and the role of familism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 857-879.
    6. Tatiana Kostova & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, 2021. "Integrating Diversity into Distance Research for Added Rigor, Parsimony, and Relevance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1669-1689, September.
    7. Susann Fiedler & Dshamilja Marie Hellmann & Angela Rachael Dorrough & Andreas Glöckner, 2018. "Cross-national in-group favoritism in prosocial behavior: Evidence from Latin and North America," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(1), pages 42-60, January.
    8. Ewa Kupcewicz, 2022. "Global Self-Esteem and Stress Intensity in a Group of Polish Nurses—A Mediatory Role of a Sense of Coherence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Aleksandra Tokarz & Diana Malinowska, 2019. "From Psychological Theoretical Assumptions to New Research Perspectives in Sustainability and Sustainable Development: Motivation in the Workplace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Godfred Anakpo & Zanele Nqwayibana & Syden Mishi, 2023. "The Impact of Work-from-Home on Employee Performance and Productivity: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Bianco, Débora & Bueno, Adauto & Godinho Filho, Moacir & Latan, Hengky & Miller Devós Ganga, Gilberto & Frank, Alejandro G. & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose, 2023. "The role of Industry 4.0 in developing resilience for manufacturing companies during COVID-19," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    12. Rocío Rodríguez-Rey & Helena Garrido-Hernansaiz & Nereida Bueno-Guerra, 2020. "Working in the Times of COVID-19. Psychological Impact of the Pandemic in Frontline Workers in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, November.
    13. Campbell Pryor & Amy Perfors & Piers D L Howe, 2019. "Conformity to the descriptive norms of people with opposing political or social beliefs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, July.
    14. repec:cup:judgdm:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:42-60 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Elli Zey & Sabine Windmann, 2021. "Effects of Message Framing, Sender Authority, and Recipients’ Self-Reported Trait Autonomy on Endorsement of Health and Safety Measures during the Early COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
    16. Tarja Välimäki & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen & Anna‐Maija Pietilä & Anne Koivisto, 2012. "Life orientation in Finnish family caregivers' of persons with Alzheimer's disease: A diary study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 480-487, December.
    17. Pablo Sáinz-Ruiz & José Ramón Martínez-Riera, 2022. "Community Assets for Health Model and Assessment Scale: A Delphi-Based Analysis and Expert Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Nelesh Dhanpat & Kamogelo Makgamatha & Reabetswe Monageng & Khanyisa Sigawuki, 2022. "COVID-19: Employee Experience and Adjustment at a State Owned Company in South Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    19. Hsing-Chun Hung & Yuh-Wen Chen, 2023. "Striving to Achieve United Nations Sustainable Development Goals of Taiwanese SMEs by Adopting Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    20. Amjad Hussain & Muhammad Umar Farooq & Muhammad Salman Habib & Tariq Masood & Catalin I. Pruncu, 2021. "COVID-19 Challenges: Can Industry 4.0 Technologies Help with Business Continuity?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, October.
    21. Kim, Jin Han & Kaemingk, Michael, 2021. "Persisting effects of social norm feedback letters in reducing household electricity usage in Post-Soviet Eastern Europe: A randomized controlled trial," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 153-161.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11492-:d:669619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.