IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10681-d654193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

School–Family Relations: An Educational Challenge in Times of COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Ferreras-Listán

    (Department of Experimental and Social Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Seville, 41013 Seville, Spain)

  • Coral I. Hunt-Gómez

    (Department of Language Teaching, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Seville, 41013 Seville, Spain)

  • Pilar Moreno-Crespo

    (Department of Research Methods and Education Diagnosis, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Seville, 41013 Seville, Spain)

  • Olga Moreno-Fernández

    (Department of Experimental and Social Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Seville, 41013 Seville, Spain)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has widened the gap regarding access to educational opportunities, which was included in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). This descriptive, quantitative study aims to examine the communication strategies employed by secondary schools in Spain during the lockdown, as well as to analyse the co-responsibility of the educational process between schools and families. An ad hoc questionnaire (GIESBAFCOV-19) was designed and implemented to gather information. The results show that, in most cases, mothers were responsible for assisting and supervising their children’s homework as persons in charge of education-related matters. Additionally, before the lockdown was put in place, about half of the participating families received information from the educative centres regarding the disease and sanitary measures. Once the lockdown took place, families put the focus on their children’s schoolwork, not without difficulties in academic and digital literacy. In general, the families were satisfied with the communication established with the educational centres. The present study has raised the necessity to improve communication between centres and families and to reflect on the tools and systems used for its exchange. Consequently, it seems that information and digital competences should be promoted to guarantee an equalitarian education for all.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Ferreras-Listán & Coral I. Hunt-Gómez & Pilar Moreno-Crespo & Olga Moreno-Fernández, 2021. "School–Family Relations: An Educational Challenge in Times of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10681-:d:654193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10681/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10681/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María José Sosa Díaz, 2021. "Emergency Remote Education, Family Support and the Digital Divide in the Context of the COVID-19 Lockdown," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. John M. Evans, 2001. "Firms' Contribution to the Reconciliation between Work and Family Life," OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers 48, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ariane Pailhé & Anne Solaz, 2019. "Is there a wage cost for employees in family‐friendly workplaces? The effect of different employer policies," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 688-721, June.
    2. Pierre-Carl Michaud & Konstantinos Tatsiramos, 2005. "Employment Dynamics of Married Women in Europe," Working Papers WR-273, RAND Corporation.
    3. John M. Evans & Samantha Callan, 2003. "Firms’ Contribution to the Reconciliation between Work and Family," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 1(4), pages 08-12, October.
    4. Gillian Whitehouse & elinda Hewitt & Bill Martin & Marian Baird, 2013. "Employer-paid Maternity Leave in Australia - A comparison of Uptake and Duration in 2005 and 2010," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 16(3), pages 311-327.
    5. Tay K. McNamara & Marcie Pitt-Catsouphes & Melissa Brown & Christina Matz-Costa, 2012. "Access to and Utilization of Flexible Work Options," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 936-965, October.
    6. Ariane Ollier-Malaterre, 2009. "Organizational Work-Life initiatives: Context matters," Post-Print hal-00565488, HAL.
    7. José Juan Carrión-Martínez & Cristina Pinel-Martínez & María Dolores Pérez-Esteban & Isabel María Román-Sánchez, 2021. "Family and School Relationship during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Fang, Tony & Lee, Byron & Timming, Andrew R. & Fan, Di, 2019. "The Effects of Work-Life Benefits on Employment Outcomes in Canada: A Multivariate Analysis," IZA Discussion Papers 12322, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Helen Russell & Philip J. O'Connell & Frances McGinnity, 2007. "The Impact of Flexible Working Arrangements on Work-Life Conflict and Work Pressure in Ireland," Papers WP189, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    10. Wiji Arulampalam & Alison L. Booth & Mark L. Bryan, 2007. "Is There a Glass Ceiling over Europe? Exploring the Gender Pay Gap across the Wage Distribution," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 60(2), pages 163-186, January.
    11. ROTARIU Irina Ionela & SERBU Razvan, 2015. "How Work Related Stress Affects Private Lives," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 67(1), pages 106-113, February.
    12. Michiyo Hashiguchi, 2009. "Correlation between Worker Demographics and Worker Access to Firm-provided Family-friendly Policies in Japan," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(4), pages 2770-2782.
    13. M. Joseph Sirgy & Dong-Jin Lee, 2018. "Work-Life Balance: an Integrative Review," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(1), pages 229-254, March.
    14. Ali Fakih, 2014. "Availability of Family-Friendly Work Practices and Implicit Wage Costs: New Evidence from Canada," CIRANO Working Papers 2014s-33, CIRANO.
    15. Mingyue Wen & Liao Liao & Yilin Wang & Xunzhi Zhou, 2022. "Effects of Healthcare Policies and Reforms at the Primary Level in China: From the Evidence of Shenzhen Primary Care Reforms from 2018 to 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Ollier-Malaterre, Ariane & Valcour, Monique & Den Dulk, Laura & Kossek, Ellen Ernst, 2013. "Theorizing national context to develop comparative work–life research: A review and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 433-447.
    17. Fakih, Ali & Ghazalian, Pascal L., 2013. "Female Labour Force Participation in MENA's Manufacturing Sector: The Implications of Firm-Related and National Factors," IZA Discussion Papers 7197, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Glenda Strachan & John Burgess, 2001. "Will Deregulating the Labor Market in Australia Improve the Employment COnditions of Women?," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 53-76.
    19. Janneke Plantenga & Chantal Remery, 2013. "Work–family reconciliation policies in Europe," Chapters, in: Deborah M. Figart & Tonia L. Warnecke (ed.), Handbook of Research on Gender and Economic Life, chapter 18, pages 290-306, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. John M. Evans, 2002. "Work/Family Reconciliation, Gender Wage Equity and Occupational Segregation: The Role of Firms and Public Policy," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 28(s1), pages 187-216, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10681-:d:654193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.