IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7342-d591267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adopting the Situation in School Questionnaire to Examine Physical Education Teachers’ Motivating and Demotivating Styles Using a Circumplex Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Géraldine Escriva-Boulley

    (LISEC Laboratory, Haute Alsace University, 68093 Mulhouse, France)

  • Emma Guillet-Descas

    (Laboratory of Vulnerabilities and Innovation in Sport (L-VIS UR 7428), University of Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France)

  • Nathalie Aelterman

    (Impetus Academy Inc., 9910 Knesselare, Belgium
    Department of Personality, Social and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Maarten Vansteenkiste

    (Department of Personality, Social and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Nele Van Doren

    (Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Vanessa Lentillon-Kaestner

    (Teaching and Research Unit in Physical Education and Sport (UER-EPS), University of Teacher Education, State of Vaud (HEP Vaud), CH1014 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Leen Haerens

    (Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

Grounded in SDT, several studies have highlighted the role of teachers’ motivating and demotivating styles for students’ motivation, learning, and physical activity in physical education (PE). However, most of these studies focused on a restricted number of motivating strategies (e.g., offering choice) or dimensions (e.g., autonomy support). Recently, researchers have developed the Situations-in-School (i.e., SIS-Education) questionnaire, which allows one to gain a more integrative and fine-grained insight into teachers’ engagement in autonomy-support, structure, control, and chaos through a circular structure (i.e., a circumplex). Although teaching in PE resembles teaching in academic courses in many ways, some of the items of the original situation-based questionnaire (e.g., regarding homework) are irrelevant to the PE context. In the present study, we therefore sought to develop a modified, PE-friendly version of this earlier validated SIS-questionnaire—the SIS-PE. Findings in a sample of Belgian (N = 136) and French (N = 259) PE teachers, examined together and as independent samples, showed that the variation in PE teachers’ motivating styles in this adapted version is also best captured by a circumplex structure, with four overarching styles and eight subareas differing in their level of need support and directiveness. The SIS-PE possesses excellent convergent and concurrent validity. With the adaptations being successful, great opportunities for future research on PE teachers (de-)motivating styles are created.

Suggested Citation

  • Géraldine Escriva-Boulley & Emma Guillet-Descas & Nathalie Aelterman & Maarten Vansteenkiste & Nele Van Doren & Vanessa Lentillon-Kaestner & Leen Haerens, 2021. "Adopting the Situation in School Questionnaire to Examine Physical Education Teachers’ Motivating and Demotivating Styles Using a Circumplex Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-27, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7342-:d:591267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7342/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7342/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rubén Trigueros & José M. Aguilar-Parra & Remedios López-Liria & Patricia Rocamora, 2019. "The Dark Side of the Self-Determination Theory and Its Influence on the Emotional and Cognitive Processes of Students in Physical Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Hazel Rose Markus & Barry Schwartz, 2010. "Does Choice Mean Freedom and Well-Being?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 344-355, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alba González-Peño & Evelia Franco & Laura Martín-Hoz & Javier Coterón, 2023. "An Individualized Training Program for PE Teachers Based on Self-Determination Theory as a Way to Improve Students’ Psychosocial Health: A Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Ginés David López-García & Antonio Granero-Gallegos & María Carrasco-Poyatos & Rafael Burgueño, 2023. "Detrimental Effects of Disempowering Climates on Teaching Intention in (Physical Education) Initial Teacher Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gallagher, H. Colin & Block, Karen & Gibbs, Lisa & Forbes, David & Lusher, Dean & Molyneaux, Robyn & Richardson, John & Pattison, Philippa & MacDougall, Colin & Bryant, Richard A., 2019. "The effect of group involvement on post-disaster mental health: A longitudinal multilevel analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 167-175.
    2. Janice Y. Jung & Barbara A. Mellers, 2016. "American attitudes toward nudges," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(1), pages 62-74, January.
    3. Manfred E Beutel & Eva M Klein & Stefan Aufenanger & Elmar Brähler & Michael Dreier & Kai W Müller & Oliver Quiring & Leonard Reinecke & Gabriele Schmutzer & Birgit Stark & Klaus Wölfling, 2016. "Procrastination, Distress and Life Satisfaction across the Age Range – A German Representative Community Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Arne Roets & Barry Schwartz & Yanjun Guan, 2012. "The tyranny of choice: a cross-cultural investigation of maximizing-satisfising effects on well-being," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7(6), pages 689-704, November.
    5. Ratna K. Shrestha & Raunak Shrestha & Sara Shneiderman & Jeevan Baniya, 2023. "Beyond Reconstruction: What Leads to Satisfaction in Post-Disaster Recovery?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1367-1395, April.
    6. Sara Hanson & Hong Yuan, 2018. "Friends with benefits: social coupons as a strategy to enhance customers’ social empowerment," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 768-787, July.
    7. Gaston-Breton, Charlotte & Sørensen, Elin Brandi & Thomsen, Thyra Uth, 2020. "“I want to break free!” How experiences of freedom foster consumer happiness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 22-32.
    8. Huang, Zhongqiang (Tak) & Kwong, Jessica Y.Y., 2016. "Illusion of variety: Lower readability enhances perceived variety," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 674-687.
    9. Delphine Godefroit-Winkel & Lisa Peñaloza, 2024. "The Ethics of Freedom in Consumption: An Ethnographic Account of the Social Dimensions of Supermarket Shopping for Moroccan Women," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 479-506, January.
    10. Sunyee Yoon & Hyeongmin Christian Kim & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Simona BottiAssociate Editor, 2018. "Feeling Economically Stuck: The Effect of Perceived Economic Mobility and Socioeconomic Status on Variety Seeking," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 1141-1156.
    11. Christoph Fuchs & Martijn G. de Jong & Martin Schreier, 2020. "Earmarking Donations to Charity: Cross-cultural Evidence on Its Appeal to Donors Across 25 Countries," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4820-4842, October.
    12. Klaus Wertenbroch & Rom Y. Schrift & Joseph W. Alba & Alixandra Barasch & Amit Bhattacharjee & Markus Giesler & Joshua Knobe & Donald R. Lehmann & Sandra Matz & Gideon Nave & Jeffrey R. Parker & Stefa, 2020. "Autonomy in consumer choice," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 429-439, December.
    13. Camacho, N.M.A. & de Jong, M.G. & Stremersch, S., 2014. "The Effect of Customer Empowerment on Adherence to Expert Advice," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-005-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. Mohamed Ali Hammami & Maher Guerchi & Okba Selmi & Faten Sehli & Hatem Ghouili & Oana Ancuța Stângaciu & Marius Alin Marinău & Ovidiu Galeru & Dan Iulian Alexe, 2023. "Effect of Verbal Encouragement on Physical Fitness, Technical Skill and Physiological Response during Small-Sided Soccer Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.
    15. Claire Callender & Kevin J. Dougherty, 2018. "Student Choice in Higher Education—Reducing or Reproducing Social Inequalities?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-28, October.
    16. Antonio Granero-Gallegos, 2020. "New Developments in Physical Education and Sport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-9, December.
    17. Nguyen Pham & Naomi Mandel & Andrea C. Morales, 2016. "Messages from the Food Police: How Food-Related Warnings Backfire among Dieters," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 175-190.
    18. Rubén Trigueros & Ana Padilla & José M. Aguilar-Parra & María J. Lirola & Amelia V. García-Luengo & Patricia Rocamora-Pérez & Remedios López-Liria, 2020. "The Influence of Teachers on Motivation and Academic Stress and Their Effect on the Learning Strategies of University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Donnel A Briley & Melanie Rudd & Jennifer Aaker & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Sharon ShavittAssociate Editor, 2017. "Cultivating Optimism: How to Frame Your Future during a Health Challenge," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 895-915.
    20. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:4:p:517-533 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:62-74 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Poluektova, Olga & Barjaková, Martina & Lunn, Pete, 2023. "Testing a Behaviourally Informed Product Comparison Tool for Private Health Insurance," Papers WP753, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7342-:d:591267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.