IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1271-d321459.html

The Associations of Income, Education and Income Inequality and Subjective Well-Being among Elderly in Hong Kong—A Multilevel Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Eric TC Lai

    (Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Ruby Yu

    (Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Jean Woo

    (Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

Abstract

Background: Higher income and education and lower income inequality in a neighbourhood have been shown to be related to better mental health outcome in developed countries. However, it is not clear whether these factors would affect the subjective well-being of the elderly, especially in a setting with recent rapid economic development. Methods: This study was conducted in 80 community centres with a total of 7552 community-dwelling elderly (mean age 75.9 years (SD = 7.79), 79% female) in Hong Kong. Income at individual level was measured as perceived disposable income. Education level was also collected. At district level, income was measured by district median household income and education was measured as the proportion of the population with no formal schooling. Income inequality was quantified using Gini coefficients. Low subjective well-being was defined as any one or a combination of the following: not satisfied with life, no meaning of life and being unhappy (Likert scale ≤ 2). Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess the association of income, education and income inequality and low subjective well-being. Results: We found that 15.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 14.5 to 16.1) of the elderly have low subjective well-being. Compared with elderly who reported a very adequate disposable income, those who reported a very inadequate disposable income are at increased risk of low subjective well-being (OR=5.08, 95%CI: 2.44 to 10.59). Compared with elderly with tertiary education, those with no formal schooling were at higher risk (OR=1.60, 95%CI 1.22 to 2.09). Income inequality was not related to subjective well-being. Conclusions : Elderly with inadequate disposable income and lower education level are more likely to suffer from low subjective well-being. At the neighbourhood level, income inequality was not related to subjective well-being. However, the relationships between neighbourhood income and education level and individuals’ subjective well-being are not clear.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric TC Lai & Ruby Yu & Jean Woo, 2020. "The Associations of Income, Education and Income Inequality and Subjective Well-Being among Elderly in Hong Kong—A Multilevel Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1271-:d:321459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruby Yu & Jean Woo, 2019. "Cognitive Assessment of Older People: Do Sensory Function and Frailty Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Charles Seaford, 2011. "Time to legislate for the good life," Nature, Nature, vol. 477(7366), pages 532-533, September.
    3. Tyler J. VanderWeele & Ilya Shpitser, 2011. "A New Criterion for Confounder Selection," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1406-1413, December.
    4. Wong, Irene O.L. & Cowling, Benjamin J. & Lo, Su-Vui & Leung, Gabriel M., 2009. "A multilevel analysis of the effects of neighbourhood income inequality on individual self-rated health in Hong Kong," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 124-132, January.
    5. Dunn, James R. & Veenstra, Gerry & Ross, Nancy, 2006. "Psychosocial and neo-material dimensions of SES and health revisited: Predictors of self-rated health in a Canadian national survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 1465-1473, March.
    6. Cowell, F.A., 2000. "Measurement of inequality," Handbook of Income Distribution, in: A.B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (ed.), Handbook of Income Distribution, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 2, pages 87-166, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qing Zheng & Min Lei & Jiayao Zhao & Xingyue Jiang & Hong Liu, 2025. "The Well-Being of Rural Elderly Surrounding Chinese Megacities: A Case Study of Xi’an, Shaanxi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, January.
    2. K. Thoufeeque Rahman & Krishna Reddy Chittedi, 2022. "Socioeconomic Inequalities in Healthy Ageing in Different Regions of India: Evidence from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India, Wave 1," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 27(2), pages 170-189, December.
    3. Rogie Royce Carandang & Akira Shibanuma & Edward Asis & Dominga Carolina Chavez & Maria Teresa Tuliao & Masamine Jimba, 2020. "“Are Filipinos Aging Well?”: Determinants of Subjective Well-Being among Senior Citizens of the Community-Based ENGAGE Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Hamitande Dout & Ayira Korem & Koffi Sodokin & Mawuli Kodjovi Couchoro & Ayi Gavriel Ayayi, 2025. "Analysing the Effect of Education on Income Dynamics in Togo," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(7), pages 1407-1420, October.
    5. Xiaodong Chen & Zeting Lin & Ran Gao & Yijian Yang & Liping Li, 2021. "Prevalence and Associated Factors of Falls among Older Adults between Urban and Rural Areas of Shantou City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-10, July.
    6. Wenjun Li & Haiyan Sun & Wen Xu & Wenyuan Ma & Xin Yuan & Yaling Niu & Changgui Kou, 2021. "Individual Social Capital and Life Satisfaction among Mainland Chinese Adults: Based on the 2016 China Family Panel Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Shiyu Yan & Jiao Wang & Zhineng Hu, 2023. "Assessment of the effects of targeted poverty alleviation policy on differently poverty‐stricken households: A multi‐propensity score weighting model," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1792-1833, August.
    8. Jiawen Huang & Yitong Fang, 2021. "Income Inequality, Neighbourhood Social Capital and Subjective Well-Being in China: Exploration of a Moderating Effect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Kefeng Yuan & Xiaoxia Zhang, 2024. "The impact of internet usage preferences on labor income: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Aiko Kikkawa & Martino Pelli & Lennart O. Reiners & Douglas Rhein, 2024. "The state of well-being of older people: a comparative study across developing Asia," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 563-609, December.
    11. Hui Wang & Ning Fang & Xuefeng Li, 2025. "Exploring Differences Between Daily Activity Spaces and Access to Urban Resources in Suburban Affordable Housing Based on the Different Income Groups: A Case of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Veenstra, Gerry & Vanzella-Yang, Adam, 2022. "Interactions between parental and personal socioeconomic resources and self-rated health: Adjudicating between the resource substitution and resource multiplication theories," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Casilda Lasso de la Vega & Ana Urrutia & Oscar Volij, 2011. "An Axiomatic Characterization Of The Theil Inequality Order," Working Papers 1103, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    3. Frick, Joachim R. & Grabka, Markus M. & Smeeding, Timothy M. & Tsakloglou, Panos, 2010. "Distributional Effects of Imputed Rents in Five European Countries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19(3), pages 167-179.
    4. Thomas Fischer, 2012. "Inequality and Financial Markets - A Simulation Approach in a Heterogeneous Agent Model," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Andrea Teglio & Simone Alfarano & Eva Camacho-Cuena & Miguel Ginés-Vilar (ed.), Managing Market Complexity, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 79-90, Springer.
    5. Eirini Andriopoulou & Eleni Kanavitsa & Chrysa Leventi, 2020. "The distributional impact of recurrent immovable property taxation in Greece," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 44(4), pages 505-528.
    6. Chunping Han, 2014. "Health Implications of Socioeconomic Characteristics, Subjective Social Status, and Perceptions of Inequality: An Empirical Study of China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(2), pages 495-514, November.
    7. Álvaro Labella & Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Cohard & José Domingo Sánchez-Martínez & Luis Martínez, 2020. "An AHPSort II Based Analysis of the Inequality Reduction within European Union," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Teixidó Figueras, Jordi & Duro Moreno, Juan Antonio, 2012. "Ecological Footprint Inequality: A methodological review and some results," Working Papers 2072/203168, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    9. Aksman, Ewa, . "Wpływ podatku dochodowego od osób fizycznych w Polsce na dobrobyt społeczny," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2008(1-2).
    10. Satya R. Chakravarty & Pietro Muliere, 2003. "Welfare indicators: A review and new perspectives. 1. Measurement of inequality," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(3), pages 457-497.
    11. Schluter, Christian & van Garderen, Kees Jan, 2009. "Edgeworth expansions and normalizing transforms for inequality measures," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 16-29, May.
    12. Filippo Gregorini, 2007. "Political Geography and Income Inequalities," DISCE - Quaderni dell'Istituto di Teoria Economica e Metodi Quantitativi itemq0746, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    13. Frank A Cowell & Christian Schluter, 1998. "Measuring Income Mobility with Dirty Data (published in Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(3), May 1999)," CASE Papers 016, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    14. Maier, Michael, 2011. "Tests for distributional treatment effects under unconfoundedness," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 49-51, January.
    15. Tingting Zhou & Michael R. Elliott & Roderick J. A. Little, 2021. "Robust Causal Estimation from Observational Studies Using Penalized Spline of Propensity Score for Treatment Comparison," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Fischer, Thomas & Riedler, Jesper, 2014. "Prices, debt and market structure in an agent-based model of the financial market," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 95-120.
    17. Michał Brzeziński, 2013. "Parametric Modelling of Income Distribution in Central and Eastern Europe," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 5(3), pages 207-230, September.
    18. Ghiglino, Christian & Venditti, Alain, 2007. "Wealth inequality, preference heterogeneity and macroeconomic volatility in two-sector economies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 414-441, July.
    19. Xun Lu, 2015. "A Covariate Selection Criterion for Estimation of Treatment Effects," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 506-522, October.
    20. Tesei, Andrea, 2015. "Trust and racial income inequality: evidence from the U.S," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 61029, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1271-:d:321459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.