IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i22p8481-d445789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Moderating Effects of Self-Referencing and Relational-Interdependent Self-Construal in Anti-Smoking Advertising for Adolescents

Author

Listed:
  • Hsiang-Ming Lee

    (Department of Health and Welfare, University of Taipei, Taipei 11153, Taiwan)

  • Ya-Hui Hsu

    (Department of Business Administration, Ming Chuan University, Taipei 11103, Taiwan)

  • Tsai Chen

    (Department of Radio, Television and Film, Shih Hsin University, Taipei 11604, Taiwan)

Abstract

The tobacco epidemic is one of the most serious public health issues in the world. Tobacco use starts and becomes established primarily during adolescence, and nearly 9 out of 10 cigarette smokers first tried smoking by age 18, with 99% first trying by age 26. This study employed a 2 (advertising appeal: emotional vs. rational) by 2 (self-referencing: analytical vs. narrative) factorial design in Study 1; and a 2 (relational-interdependent self-construal: high and low) by 3 (social relational cue: self, friend, and family) factorial design in Study 2. The behavior intention of anti-smoking acted as the measured dependent variable. Samples of 192 (Study 1) and 222 (Study 2) were collected from one of the biggest high schools in northern Taiwan. The results showed advertising appeal and self-referencing had a significant interaction effect on behavior intention ( p = 0.040). The results also showed rational appealing advertising is suitable for analytical self-referencing ( p = 0.022) and emotional appealing advertising is suitable for narrative self-referencing ( p = 0.067). However, the social relationship cue and relational-interdependent self-construal had no significant interaction effect on behavior intention, and only relational-interdependent self-construal significantly affected behavior intention ( p < 0.001). Regardless of whether the relational-interdependent self-construal is high or low, when the anti-smoking advertising is from the family perspective to persuade adolescents not to smoke, both influence the adolescent more than the other two social relationship cues (self and friend).

Suggested Citation

  • Hsiang-Ming Lee & Ya-Hui Hsu & Tsai Chen, 2020. "The Moderating Effects of Self-Referencing and Relational-Interdependent Self-Construal in Anti-Smoking Advertising for Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8481-:d:445789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8481/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8481/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Kyuha & Lee, Sungmi & Choi, Yung Kyun, 2019. "Image proximity in advertising appeals: Spatial distance and product types," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 490-497.
    2. Jennifer Edson Escalas, 2007. "Self-Referencing and Persuasion: Narrative Transportation versus Analytical Elaboration," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(4), pages 421-429, December.
    3. Caroline Ardelet & Barbara Slavich & Gwarlann de Kerviler, 2015. "Self-referencing narratives to predict consumers\textquotesingle preferences in the luxury industry: A longitudinal study," Post-Print hal-01563027, HAL.
    4. Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy & Sujan, Mita, 1999. "Retrospection versus Anticipation: The Role of the Ad under Retrospective and Anticipatory Self-Referencing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 55-69, June.
    5. World Health Organization, 2015. "WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2015: Raising taxes on tobacco," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt1fh1f32m, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    6. Gurhan-Canli, Zeynep & Maheswaran, Durairaj, 2000. "Determinants of Country-of-Origin Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(1), pages 96-108, June.
    7. Ruiz, Salvador & Sicilia, Maria, 2004. "The impact of cognitive and/or affective processing styles on consumer response to advertising appeals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 657-664, June.
    8. Das, Gopal & Roy, Rajat, 2019. "How self-construal guides preference for partitioned versus combined pricing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 152-160.
    9. Ardelet, Caroline & Slavich, Barbara & de Kerviler, Gwarlann, 2015. "Self-referencing narratives to predict consumers' preferences in the luxury industry: A longitudinal study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 2037-2044.
    10. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Peracchio, Laura A, 1996. "Moderators of the Impact of Self-Reference on Persuasion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(4), pages 408-423, March.
    11. Jiewen Hong & Hannah H. Chang, 2015. ""I" Follow My Heart and "We" Rely on Reasons: The Impact of Self-Construal on Reliance on Feelings versus Reasons in Decision Making," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(6), pages 1392-1411.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hung, Yu-Chen & Song, Liang & Chao, Chih-Wei (Fred) & Guan, Chong, 2017. "Love at first sight: The effect of presentation order on evaluation of experiential options in luxury tour packages," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 181-191.
    2. Zhou, Shuang & Blazquez, Marta & McCormick, Helen & Barnes, Liz, 2021. "How social media influencers’ narrative strategies benefit cultivating influencer marketing: Tackling issues of cultural barriers, commercialised content, and sponsorship disclosure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 122-142.
    3. Didem Gamze Isiksal & Elif Karaosmanoglu, 2020. "Can self-referencing exacerbate punishing behavior toward corporate brand transgressors?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(6), pages 629-644, November.
    4. Didem Gamze Isiksal & Elif Karaosmanoglu, 0. "Can self-referencing exacerbate punishing behavior toward corporate brand transgressors?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    5. Fabien Pecot & Virginie de Barnier, 2018. "Brands using historical references: a consumers’ perspective," Post-Print hal-03511250, HAL.
    6. Dong Hoo Kim & Doori Song, 2019. "Can brand experience shorten consumers’ psychological distance toward the brand? The effect of brand experience on consumers’ construal level," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 255-267, May.
    7. Gurzki, Hannes & Woisetschläger, David M., 2017. "Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 147-166.
    8. Huang, Tseng-Lung, 2019. "Psychological mechanisms of brand love and information technology identity in virtual retail environments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 251-264.
    9. Yim, Mark Yi-Cheon & Baek, Tae Hyun & Sauer, Paul L., 2018. "I See Myself in Service and Product Consumptions: Measuring Self-transformative Consumption Vision (SCV) Evoked by Static and Rich Media," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 122-139.
    10. Hajdas Monika & Szpulak Aleksandra & Radomska Joanna & Silva Susana C., 2022. "Don’t tell me stories – the narratives of retirement and their relation with brand associations," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 58(1), pages 17-32, March.
    11. Lidan Xu & Ravi Mehta, 2022. "Technology devalues luxury? Exploring consumer responses to AI-designed luxury products," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 1135-1152, November.
    12. Yi-Ching Hsieh & Hung-Chang Chiu & Yun-Chia Tang & Chen-Hao Liu, 2018. "Understanding the influences of story elements in service businesses," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(3), pages 601-619, September.
    13. Tom Laer, 2014. "The Means to Justify the End: Combating Cyber Harassment in Social Media," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 85-98, August.
    14. Plotkina, Daria & Saurel, Hélène, 2019. "Me or just like me? The role of virtual try-on and physical appearance in apparel M-retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 362-377.
    15. Fabien Pecot & Virginie Barnier, 2018. "Brands using historical references: a consumers’ perspective," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(2), pages 171-184, March.
    16. Wien, Anders Hauge & Peluso, Alessandro M., 2021. "Influence of human versus AI recommenders: The roles of product type and cognitive processes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 13-27.
    17. Junichi Minagawa & Thorsten Upmann, 2019. "Price Effects on Compound Commodities," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(2), pages 630-646, April.
    18. Diandian Xiang & Leinan Zhang & Qiuyan Tao & Yonggui Wang & Shuang Ma, 2019. "Informational or emotional appeals in crowdfunding message strategy: an empirical investigation of backers’ support decisions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1046-1063, November.
    19. Odermatt, Reto & Stutzer, Alois, 2018. "Tobacco Control Policies and Smoking Behavior in Europe: More Than Trends?," Working papers 2018/24, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    20. Popkowski Leszczyc, Peter T.L. & Qiu, Chun & He, Yongfu, 2009. "Empirical Testing of the Reference-Price Effect of Buy-Now Prices in Internet Auctions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 211-221.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8481-:d:445789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.