IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v51y2019icp362-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Me or just like me? The role of virtual try-on and physical appearance in apparel M-retailing

Author

Listed:
  • Plotkina, Daria
  • Saurel, Hélène

Abstract

This research investigated a crucial topic in apparel m-commerce: product presentation and the extent to which it should exhibit human visuals corresponding to consumers' appearance. A mobile application with virtual try-on (VTO) tool based on augmented reality was compared to a traditional m-commerce interface showing models with physical features not, partially, or completely similar to the consumers’. A theoretical framework based on the Technology Acceptance Model was adopted to explain the impact of the application and the mediating role of perceived hedonic value (enjoyment) and utilitarian value (convenience, ease of use, and usefulness) on attitude toward the shopping technology and purchase intention. An online experiment (415 respondents) and a qualitative study (49 respondents) showed that the VTO tool was less enjoyable than traditional m-commerce interfaces and less convenient and useful than pictures of models with physical features similar to those of consumers. Implications for academics and managers are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Plotkina, Daria & Saurel, Hélène, 2019. "Me or just like me? The role of virtual try-on and physical appearance in apparel M-retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 362-377.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:51:y:2019:i:c:p:362-377
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.07.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698918311834
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.07.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denise Janssen & Leonard Paas, 2014. "Moderately thin advertising models are optimal, most of the time: Moderating the quadratic effect of model body size on ad attitude by fashion leadership," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 167-177, June.
    2. Sylvie Borau & Jean-François Bonnefon, 2017. "The advertising performance of non-ideal female models as a function of viewers' body mass index: a moderated mediation analysis of two competing affective pathways," Post-Print halshs-01698396, HAL.
    3. Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy & Sujan, Mita, 1999. "Retrospection versus Anticipation: The Role of the Ad under Retrospective and Anticipatory Self-Referencing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 55-69, June.
    4. Poushneh, Atieh, 2018. "Augmented reality in retail: A trade-off between user's control of access to personal information and augmentation quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 169-176.
    5. Poushneh, Atieh & Vasquez-Parraga, Arturo Z., 2017. "Discernible impact of augmented reality on retail customer's experience, satisfaction and willingness to buy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 229-234.
    6. Dirk Smeesters & Thomas Mussweiler & Naomi Mandel, 2010. "The Effects of Thin and Heavy Media Images on Overweight and Underweight Consumers: Social Comparison Processes and Behavioral Implications," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(6), pages 930-949, April.
    7. Kumar, Deepak S. & Purani, Keyoor & Viswanathan, Shyam A., 2018. "Influences of ‘appscape’ on mobile app adoption and m-loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 132-141.
    8. C. Ranganathan & Sanjeev Jha, 2007. "Examining Online Purchase Intentions in B2C E-Commerce: Testing an Integrated Model," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 20(4), pages 48-64, October.
    9. Tim Hilken & Ko de Ruyter & Mathew Chylinski & Dominik Mahr & Debbie I. Keeling, 2017. "Augmenting the eye of the beholder: exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 884-905, November.
    10. Cho, Hyejeung & Schwarz, Norbert, 2012. "I Like Your Product When I Like My Photo: Misattribution Using Interactive Virtual Mirrors," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 235-243.
    11. Rese, Alexandra & Baier, Daniel & Geyer-Schulz, Andreas & Schreiber, Stefanie, 2017. "How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 306-319.
    12. Yim, Mark Yi-Cheon & Chu, Shu-Chuan & Sauer, Paul L., 2017. "Is Augmented Reality Technology an Effective Tool for E-commerce? An Interactivity and Vividness Perspective," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 89-103.
    13. Zhenhui Jiang & Izak Benbasat, 2007. "Research Note---Investigating the Influence of the Functional Mechanisms of Online Product Presentations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 454-470, December.
    14. Richins, Marsha L, 1991. "Social Comparison and the Idealized Images of Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 71-83, June.
    15. Javornik, Ana, 2016. "Augmented reality: Research agenda for studying the impact of its media characteristics on consumer behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 252-261.
    16. Scholz, Joachim & Duffy, Katherine, 2018. "We ARe at home: How augmented reality reshapes mobile marketing and consumer-brand relationships," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 11-23.
    17. Beck, Marie & Crié, Dominique, 2018. "I virtually try it … I want it ! Virtual Fitting Room: A tool to increase on-line and off-line exploratory behavior, patronage and purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 279-286.
    18. Sucharita Chandran & Vicki G. Morwitz, 2005. "Effects of Participative Pricing on Consumers' Cognitions and Actions: A Goal Theoretic Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 249-259, September.
    19. Sirgy, M Joseph, 1982. "Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(3), pages 287-300, December.
    20. Xinshu Zhao & John G. Lynch & Qimei Chen, 2010. "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 197-206, August.
    21. Anik St-Onge & Aurelie Merles & Florian Pichonneau & Sylvain Sénécal, 2017. "Does the Size of a Fashion Model on a Retailer’s Website Impact the Customer Perceived Attractiveness of the Model and Purchase Intention? The Role of Gender, Body Satisfaction and Congruence," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Jocelyn Bellemare & Serge Carrier & Kjeld Nielsen & Frank T. Piller (ed.), Managing Complexity, chapter 0, pages 281-285, Springer.
    22. Kim, Jiyeon & Forsythe, Sandra, 2008. "Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 45-59.
    23. Yoo, Jungmin & Kim, Minjeong, 2014. "The effects of online product presentation on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2464-2472.
    24. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Peracchio, Laura A, 1996. "Moderators of the Impact of Self-Reference on Persuasion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(4), pages 408-423, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    2. Soren, Anup Anurag & Chakraborty, Shibashish, 2023. "The formation of habit and word-of-mouth intention of over-the-top platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Jayaswal, Pragya & Parida, Biswajita, 2023. "The role of augmented reality in redefining e-tailing: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Song-yi Youn & Joohye Hwang & Li Zhao & Jong-Bum Kim, 2023. "Privacy paradox in 3D body scanning technology: the effect of 3D virtual try-on experience in the relationship between privacy concerns and mobile app adoption intention," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Jiang, Yi & Wang, Xueqin & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Augmented reality shopping application usage: The influence of attitude, value, and characteristics of innovation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    6. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Reimers, Hanna, 2022. "Carbon footprint tracking apps. What drives consumers' adoption intention?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikhashemi, S.R. & Knight, Helena H. & Nusair, Khaldoon & Liat, Cheng Boon, 2021. "Augmented reality in smart retailing: A (n) (A) Symmetric Approach to continuous intention to use retail brands’ mobile AR apps," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    2. Jayaswal, Pragya & Parida, Biswajita, 2023. "The role of augmented reality in redefining e-tailing: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Joerß, Tom & Hoffmann, Stefan & Mai, Robert & Akbar, Payam, 2021. "Digitalization as solution to environmental problems? When users rely on augmented reality-recommendation agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 510-523.
    4. Hsu, Sheila Hsuan-Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2021. "“Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?†customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    6. Fan, Xiaojun & Chai, Zeli & Deng, Nianqi & Dong, Xuebing, 2020. "Adoption of augmented reality in online retailing and consumers’ product attitude: A cognitive perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    7. Huang, Tseng-Lung, 2019. "Psychological mechanisms of brand love and information technology identity in virtual retail environments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 251-264.
    8. Scholz, Joachim & Duffy, Katherine, 2018. "We ARe at home: How augmented reality reshapes mobile marketing and consumer-brand relationships," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 11-23.
    9. Rauschnabel, Philipp A. & Felix, Reto & Hinsch, Chris, 2019. "Augmented reality marketing: How mobile AR-apps can improve brands through inspiration," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 43-53.
    10. Hinsch, Chris & Felix, Reto & Rauschnabel, Philipp A., 2020. "Nostalgia beats the wow-effect: Inspiration, awe and meaningful associations in augmented reality marketing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    11. Petit, Olivia & Velasco, Carlos & Spence, Charles, 2019. "Digital Sensory Marketing: Integrating New Technologies Into Multisensory Online Experience," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 42-61.
    12. Kowalczuk, Pascal & Siepmann (née Scheiben), Carolin & Adler, Jost, 2021. "Cognitive, affective, and behavioral consumer responses to augmented reality in e-commerce: A comparative study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 357-373.
    13. Holdack, Eric & Lurie-Stoyanov, Katja & Fromme, Harro Fabian, 2022. "The role of perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness in assessing the acceptance of AR wearables," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    14. Vieira, Valter Afonso & Rafael, Diego Nogueira & Agnihotri, Raj, 2022. "Augmented reality generalizations: A meta-analytical review on consumer-related outcomes and the mediating role of hedonic and utilitarian values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 170-184.
    15. Yang, Shuai & Carlson, Jeffrey R. & Chen, Sixing, 2020. "How augmented reality affects advertising effectiveness: The mediating effects of curiosity and attention toward the ad," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    16. Li, Chia-Ying & Fang, Yu-Hui, 2020. "I searched, I collected, I experienced: Exploring how mobile augmented reality makes the players go," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    17. Arghashi, Vahideh & Yuksel, Cenk Arsun, 2022. "Interactivity, Inspiration, and Perceived Usefulness! How retailers’ AR-apps improve consumer engagement through flow," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Bonnin, Gaël, 2020. "The roles of perceived risk, attractiveness of the online store and familiarity with AR in the influence of AR on patronage intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    19. Poushneh, Atieh, 2021. "How close do we feel to virtual product to make a purchase decision? Impact of perceived proximity to virtual product and temporal purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Sun, Chunhua & Fang, Yuan & Kong, Meng & Chen, Xiayu & Liu, Yezheng, 2022. "Influence of augmented reality product display on consumers’ product attitudes: A product uncertainty reduction perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:51:y:2019:i:c:p:362-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.