IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p7953-d437036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Femicide Fatal Risk Factors: A Last Decade Comparison between Italian Victims of Femicide by Age Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Sorrentino

    (Department of Psychology, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, 81100 Caserta, Italy)

  • Chiara Guida

    (Department of Psychology, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, 81100 Caserta, Italy)

  • Vincenza Cinquegrana

    (Department of Psychology, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, 81100 Caserta, Italy)

  • Anna Costanza Baldry

    (Department of Psychology, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, 81100 Caserta, Italy)

Abstract

Femicide is a wide-spread lethal form of violence against women. Despite its diffusion, to date, very few studies analyzed possible victims’ age differences in regard to fatal risk factors for femicide. To this aim, we carried out archive research on Italian femicide cases in the last decade, by comparing prior types of violence suffered and motives for femicide, which are considered crucial fatal risk factors for femicide, across adolescent/young (15–24 years), adults (25–64 years) and older women (65–93 years). From 2010 to 2019 we found 1207 female victims. Characteristics of victims, perpetrators, and their relationship were consistent with those found by international studies and underlined that the majority of femicides were perpetrated by an intimate partner. The results regarding fatal risk factors comparisons across age groups showed the existence of significant differences regarding both types of violence suffered prior to femicide and motives for femicide. The results are discussed in terms of policy implication and intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Sorrentino & Chiara Guida & Vincenza Cinquegrana & Anna Costanza Baldry, 2020. "Femicide Fatal Risk Factors: A Last Decade Comparison between Italian Victims of Femicide by Age Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7953-:d:437036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7953/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7953/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen Vives-Cases & Isabel Goicolea & Alison Hernández & Belen Sanz-Barbero & Aisha K Gill & Anna Costanza Baldry & Monika Schröttle & Heidi Stoeckl, 2016. "Expert Opinions on Improving Femicide Data Collection across Europe: A Concept Mapping Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Saveria Capecchi, 2019. "The numbers of Intimate Partner Violence and femicide in Italy: methodological issues in Italian research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 2635-2645, September.
    3. Campbell, J.C. & Webster, D. & Koziol-McLain, J. & Block, C. & Campbell, D. & Curry, M.A. & Gary, F. & Glass, N. & McFarlane, J. & Sachs, C. & Sharps, P. & Ulrich, Y. & Wilt, S.A. & Manganello, J. & X, 2003. "Risk Factors for Femicide in Abusive Relationships: Results from a Multisite Case Control Study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(7), pages 1089-1097.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erika Cantor & Rodrigo Salas & Romina Torres, 2022. "Femicide and Attempted Femicide before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Chile," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Esperanza Garcia-Vergara & Nerea Almeda & Blanca Martín Ríos & David Becerra-Alonso & Francisco Fernández-Navarro, 2022. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Femicide: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth Richardson Vigdor & James A. Mercy, 2006. "Do Laws Restricting Access to Firearms by Domestic Violence Offenders Prevent Intimate Partner Homicide?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 313-346, June.
    2. Gerdes, Madison B, 2023. "Assessing the relationship between gun ownership and fear of mass shootings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    3. Lynch, Kellie R. & Jackson, Dylan B., 2021. "Firearm exposure and the health of high-risk intimate partner violence victims," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. repec:max:cprpbr:51 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Güneş Koç, 2022. "A Study of Femicide in Turkey From 2010 to 2017," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    6. Katherine A. Vittes & Susan B. Sorenson, 2006. "Are Temporary Restraining Orders More Likely to Be Issued When Applications Mention Firearms?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 266-282, June.
    7. Susan B. Sorenson, 2006. "Firearm Use in Intimate Partner Violence," Evaluation Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 229-236, June.
    8. Cook, Philip J. & Ludwig, Jens, 2006. "The social costs of gun ownership," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-2), pages 379-391, January.
    9. Durrance, Christine Piette & Golden, Shelley & Perreira, Krista & Cook, Philip, 2011. "Taxing sin and saving lives: Can alcohol taxation reduce female homicides?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 169-176, July.
    10. Jorge Mori Mojalott, 2020. "Progreso de género, acceso a la justicia y campañas de prevención como determinantes del feminicidio en Perú," Revista de Análisis Económico y Financiero, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, vol. 2(01), pages 50-63.
    11. Kevin Petersen & Robert C. Davis & David Weisburd & Bruce Taylor, 2022. "Effects of second responder programs on repeat incidents of family abuse: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    12. Pouya Gholizadeh & Behzad Esmaeili, 2020. "Developing a Multi-variate Logistic Regression Model to Analyze Accident Scenarios: Case of Electrical Contractors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, July.
    13. Hoyle, Carolyn, 2008. "Will she be safe? A critical analysis of risk assessment in domestic violence cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 323-337, March.
    14. Patricia O’Campo & Nihaya Daoud & Sarah Hamilton-Wright & James Dunn, 2016. "Conceptualizing Housing Instability: Experiences with Material and Psychological Instability Among Women Living with Partner Violence," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Manisha Joshi & Susan B. Sorenson, 2010. "Intimate Partner Violence at the Scene: Incident Characteristics and Implications for Public Health Surveillance," Evaluation Review, , vol. 34(2), pages 116-136, April.
    16. Kafka, Julie M. & Moracco, Kathryn E. & Williams, Deanna S. & Hoffman, Claire G., 2021. "What is the role of firearms in nonfatal intimate partner violence? Findings from civil protective order case data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    17. James F. Anderson & Kellie Reinsmith-Jones & Tazinski Lee & Adam H. Langsam, 2019. "A Tri-state Investigation of Firearms Confiscation on Three Regional University Campuses," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(5), pages 22-33, September.
    18. Fernández-Kranz, Daniel & Nollenberger, Natalia & Roff, Jennifer Louise, 2020. "Bargaining under Threats: The Effect of Joint Custody Laws on Intimate Partner Violence," IZA Discussion Papers 13810, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Koppa, Vijetha, 2024. "Can information save lives? Effect of a victim-focused police intervention on intimate partner homicides," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 756-782.
    20. Monica Caicedo‐Roa & Tiago Da Veiga Pereira & Ricardo Carlos Cordeiro, 2020. "PROTOCOL: Risk factors for femicide," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    21. Chopin, Julien & Fortin, Francis & Guay, Jean-Pierre & Péloquin, Olivier & Paquette, Sarah & Chartrand, Eric, 2023. "‘Till death do us part’: An integrated multi-theoretical approach to identify predictors of intimate partner homicide," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7953-:d:437036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.