IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i17p6241-d405129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of Two Questionnaires to Study the Perception of Conflict in Physical Education

Author

Listed:
  • Unai Sáez de Ocáriz

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), INDEST, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Barcelona, 08038 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Pere Lavega-Burgués

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), INDEST, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, 25192 Lleida, Spain)

Abstract

Improving the quality of teaching and learning, as well as school coexistence are international priorities for the new educational challenges of the 21st century (UNESCO 37 C/4 resolution). Physical Education (PE) has become a key subject for education on school coexistence by enabling significant motor experiences to promote interpersonal relationships and transform motor conflicts (MC). The objective of this research was to develop and validate two questionnaires (CONFLICT1-AGE and CONFLICT1-RES) to study secondary school students’ perception about MC in PE. Study 1 searched for evidence related to their content validity and response process validity, and Study 2 examined internal structure, reliability, and concurrent validity. As a result, a seven-item single-factor model was selected for CONFLICT1-AGE, and a five-item single-factor structure was chosen for CONFLICT1-RES. Both models exhibited an excellent fit to the data, where CONFLICT1-AGE: χ 2 ( df ) = 18.621 (14), p = 0.180, RMSEA (90% CI) = 0.033 0(0.000–0.069), CFI = 0.994, TLI = 0.991; CONFLICT1-RES: χ 2 ( df ) = 13.350 (5), p = 0.020, RMSEA (90% CI) = 0.075 (0.027–0.125), CFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.972. Furthermore, both questionnaires presented satisfactory internal consistency (α CONFLICT1-AGE = 0.745, α CONFLICT1-RES = 0.737). Their combination will provide a wide view of secondary school students’ perception about MC.

Suggested Citation

  • Unai Sáez de Ocáriz & Pere Lavega-Burgués, 2020. "Development and Validation of Two Questionnaires to Study the Perception of Conflict in Physical Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6241-:d:405129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6241/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6241/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Granero-Gallegos & Manuel Gómez-López & Juan González-Hernández & Antonio Baena-Extremera & María del Mar Ortiz-Camacho, 2018. "Spanish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Sport Motivation Scale-II with High School Physical Education Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Rubén Trigueros & Adolfo J. Cangas & José M. Aguilar-Parra & Joaquín F. Álvarez & Alexandre García-Más, 2019. "No More Bricks in the Wall: Adopting Healthy Lifestyles through Physical Education Classes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Ledyard Tucker & Charles Lewis, 1973. "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Javier Cejudo & Lidia Losada & Roberto Feltrero, 2020. "Promoting Social and Emotional Learning and Subjective Well-Being: Impact of the “Aislados” Intervention Program in Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Rubén Trigueros & Antonio Alias & Ana M. Gallardo & Marta García-Tascón & José M. Aguilar-Parra, 2020. "Validation and Adaptation of the Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale to the Spanish context of Physical Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-9, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruben Trigueros & Marta García-Tascón & Ana M. Gallardo & Antonio Alías & José M. Aguilar-Parra, 2020. "The Influence of the Teacher’s Prosocial Skills on the Mindwandering, Creative Intelligence, Emotions, and Academic Performance of Secondary Students in the Area of Physical Education Classes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-10, February.
    2. Nuanphromsakul, Kajohnjak & Szczepańska-Woszczyna, Katarzyna & Kot, Sebastian & Chaveesuk, Singha & Chaiyasoonthorn, Wornchanok, 2022. "Sustainability of Rubber Farmers Cooperatives: Empirical Evaluation of Determining Factors," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(4), December.
    3. Mark Shevlin & David Boyda & James Houston & Jamie Murphy, 2015. "Measurement of the psychosis continuum: Modelling the frequency and distress of subclinical psychotic experiences," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 108-118, April.
    4. E. Huebner & Rich Gilman & James Laughlin, 1999. "A Multimethod Investigation of the Multidimensionality of Children's Well-Being Reports: Discriminant Validity of Life Satisfaction and Self-Esteem," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Ali Safarnejad & Jose-Antonio Izazola-Licea, 2017. "Direct and indirect effects of enablers on HIV testing, initiation and retention in antiretroviral treatment and AIDS related mortality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Lili Tian & Li Zhang & E. Scott Huebner & Xiaoting Zheng & Wang Liu, 2016. "The Longitudinal Relationship Between School Belonging and Subjective Well-Being in School Among Elementary School Students," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 11(4), pages 1269-1285, December.
    7. Ronald S. Burt, 1973. "Confirmatory Factor-Analytic Structures and the Theory Construction Process," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 2(2), pages 131-190, November.
    8. Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku & Ziska Fields & Ethel Abe, 2017. "Cultural Values and Human Resource Outcomes in the Nigerian Banking Industry," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 67(2), pages 26-46, April-Jun.
    9. Evangeline I. Chirayil & Claire L. Thompson & Sue Burney, 2014. "Predicting Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination and Pap Smear Screening Intentions Among Young Singaporean Women Using the Theory of Planned Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, October.
    10. Chong, Melody P.M. & Muethel, Miriam & Richards, Malika & Fu, Ping Ping & Peng, Tai-Kuang & Shang, Yu Fan & Caldas, Miguel P., 2013. "Influence behaviors and employees’ reactions: An empirical test among six societies based on a transactional–relational contract model," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 373-384.
    11. Jon W. Hoelter, 1983. "The Analysis of Covariance Structures," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 11(3), pages 325-344, February.
    12. Bach Quang Ho & Yuki Inoue, 2020. "Driving Network Externalities in Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Cheng Suang Heng & Ben C. F. Choi, 2013. "Research Note —Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 579-595, September.
    14. Lau, Patricia Yin Yin & Tong, Jane L.Y. Terpstra & Lien, Bella Ya-Hui & Hsu, Yen-Chen & Chong, Chooi Ling, 2017. "Ethical work climate, employee commitment and proactive customer service performance: Test of the mediating effects of organizational politics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 20-26.
    15. Zi Jia Ng & Eugene Scott Huebner & Alberto Maydeu-Olivares & Kimberly Joy Hills, 2018. "Confirmatory Factor Analytic Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS) in a Longitudinal Sample of Adolescents," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(4), pages 1237-1247, August.
    16. Cesar Ivan Aviles Gonzalez & Maura Galletta & Paola Melis & Paolo Contu & Jean Watson & Gabriele Finco & Maria Francisca Jimenez Herrera, 2019. "Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Caring Efficacy scale in a sample of Italian nurses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, May.
    17. Mecking, Rebecca-Ariane & Roosen, Jutta, 2015. "Consumer empowerment in food retailing and the role of altruistic motives: an application of the theory of planned behavior," 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy 202698, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Khawar Ahmed Khan & Fei Ma & Muhammad Ali Akbar & Mohammad Shariful Islam & Maryam Ali & Shaif Noor, 2024. "Reverse Logistics Practices: A Dilemma to Gain Competitive Advantage in Manufacturing Industries of Pakistan with Organization Performance as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Daniel Shek & Xiang Li, 2016. "Perceived School Performance, Life Satisfaction, and Hopelessness: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study of Adolescents in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 126(2), pages 921-934, March.
    20. Raymond Loi & Hang-Yue Ngo, 2010. "Mobility norms, risk aversion, and career satisfaction of Chinese employees," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 237-255, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6241-:d:405129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.