IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgames/v9y2018i2p20-d143407.html

Ethics, Morality, and Game Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Alfano

    (Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands
    Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry, Australian Catholic University, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia)

  • Hannes Rusch

    (School of Business and Economics, Philipps University Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany
    TUM School of Governance, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Matthias Uhl

    (TUM School of Governance, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Ethics is a field in which the gap between words and actions looms large. Game theory and the empirical methods it inspires look at behavior instead of the lip service people sometimes pay to norms. We believe that this special issue comprises several illustrations of the fruitful application of this approach to ethics.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Alfano & Hannes Rusch & Matthias Uhl, 2018. "Ethics, Morality, and Game Theory," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-4, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:20-:d:143407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/9/2/20/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/9/2/20/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florian Baumann & Tim Friehe, 2017. "On Adverse Effects of Consumers’ Attaching Greater Importance to Firms’ Ethical Conduct," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-7, September.
    2. Roberto Sarkisian, 2017. "Team Incentives under Moral and Altruistic Preferences: Which Team to Choose?," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Heike Hennig-Schmidt & Gari Walkowitz, 2017. "Moral Entitlements and Aspiration Formation in Asymmetric Bargaining: Experimental Evidence from Germany and China," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Binmore, Ken, 1999. "Game Theory and Business Ethics," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 31-35, January.
    5. Zachary Grossman & Joël J. Van der Weele, 2017. "Dual-Process Reasoning in Charitable Giving: Learning from Non-Results," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Ingela Alger & Jörgen W. Weibull, 2017. "Strategic Behavior of Moralists and Altruists," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Solomon, Robert C., 1999. "Game Theory As A Model For Business And Business Ethics," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 11-29, January.
    8. Sarkisian, Roberto, 2017. "Team Incentives under Moral and Altruistic Preferences: Which Team to Choose?," TSE Working Papers 17-838, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    9. Jelle De Boer, 2017. "Social Preferences and Context Sensitivity," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Nives Della Valle & Matteo Ploner, 2017. "Reacting to Unfairness: Group Identity and Dishonest Behavior," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Ignacio Rivero Wildemauwe, 2023. "Moral motivations in sequential buyer-seller interactions with adverse selection," Thema Working Papers 2023-11, THEMA (Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), CY Cergy-Paris University, ESSEC and CNRS.
    2. Boris van Leeuwen & Ingela Alger, 2024. "Estimating Social Preferences and Kantian Morality in Strategic Interactions," Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(4), pages 665-706.
    3. Pau Juan-Bartroli & Jos'e Ignacio Rivero-Wildemauwe, 2025. "Social preferences or moral concerns: What drives rejections in the Ultimatum game?," Papers 2510.22086, arXiv.org.
    4. Jos'e Ignacio Rivero-Wildemauwe, 2025. "Trade among moral agents with information asymmetries," Papers 2505.20551, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    5. Mohanty, Sambit & Rao, K.S. Mallikarjuna & Roy, Jaideep, 2024. "Kantian imperatives in public goods networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 194-214.
    6. José Ignacio Rivero Wildemauwe, 2023. "Trade among moral agents with information asymmetries," Thema Working Papers 2023-10, THEMA (Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), CY Cergy-Paris University, ESSEC and CNRS.
    7. Roberto Sarkisian, 2021. "Screening Teams of Moral and Altruistic Agents," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, October.
    8. Raphaël Soubeyran, 2019. "Technology adoption and pro-social preferences," Working Papers halshs-02291905, HAL.
    9. Esteban Muñoz Sobrado, 2022. "Taxing Moral Agents," CESifo Working Paper Series 9867, CESifo.
    10. Raphaël Soubeyran, 2019. "Incentives, pro-social preferences and discrimination," CEE-M Working Papers hal-02056347, CEE-M, Universtiy of Montpellier, CNRS, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro.
    11. Ingela Alger & Jörgen W. Weibull, 2017. "Strategic Behavior of Moralists and Altruists," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Thomas Eichner & Rüdiger Pethig, 2026. "How Important are IEAs for Mitigation if Countries are of the Homo Moralis Type?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 89(3), pages 1-42, March.
    13. Ingela Alger & Jean-François Laslier, 2022. "Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: Coordination and information aggregation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 34(2), pages 280-312, April.
    14. Steven Gold, 2010. "The Implications of Rorty’s Post-Foundational “Moral Imagination” for Teaching Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 299-310, August.
    15. Hannes Lang & Gregory DeAngelo & Michelle Bongard, 2018. "Theory of Mind and General Intelligence in Dictator and Ultimatum Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Eichner, Thomas & Runkel, Marco, 2025. "Morality-induced leakage and decentralized environmental policy," VfS Annual Conference 2025 (Cologne): Revival of Industrial Policy 325421, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    17. Benistant, Julien & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2019. "Unethical behavior and group identity in contests," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 128-155.
    18. Christoph Rössler & Tim Friehe, 2020. "Liability, morality, and image concerns in product accidents with third parties," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 295-312, October.
    19. Heike Hennig-Schmidt & Zhuyu Li & Gari Walkowitz, 2024. "Fairness Deliberations and Fair Allocations in Symmetric and Asymmetric Bargaining–An Experimental Study on Group Decisions in Germany and China," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 1429-1469, December.
    20. repec:osf:osfxxx:w8afg_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Cavagnetto Stefano & Gahir Bruce, 2014. "Game Theory - Its Applications to Ethical Decision Making," CRIS - Bulletin of the Centre for Research and Interdisciplinary Study, Sciendo, vol. 2014(1), pages 1-19, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:20-:d:143407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.