The Implications of Rorty’s Post-Foundational “Moral Imagination” for Teaching Business Ethics
No abstract is available for this item.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Mathiesen, Kay, 1999. "Game Theory in Business Ethics: Bad Ideology or Bad Press?," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(01), pages 37-45, January.
- Harvey S. James Jr. & Jeffrey Cohen, 2002. "Does Ethics Training Neutralize the Incentives of the Prisoner's Dilemma? Evidence from a Classroom Experiment," General Economics and Teaching 0202002, EconWPA, revised 12 Mar 2003.
- Werhane, Patricia H., 2006. "A Place for Philosophers in Applied Ethics and the Role of Moral Reasoning in Moral Imagination: A Response to Richard Rorty," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(03), pages 401-408, July.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:94:y:2010:i:2:p:299-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)or (Rebekah McClure)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.