IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgames/v16y2025i2p14-d1610078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greenwashing Risks in Environmental Quality Competition: Detection and Deterrence

Author

Listed:
  • Arka Mukherjee

    (Department of Decision Sciences, School of Business, MacEwan University, Edmonton, AB T5J 4S2, Canada)

  • Subhadip Ghosh

    (Department of Decision Sciences, School of Business, MacEwan University, Edmonton, AB T5J 4S2, Canada)

Abstract

The rising prevalence of greenwashing by firms has emerged as a major concern for regulatory authorities over the past decade. This paper examines the impact of regulation on firms’ strategic decisions regarding greenwashing and environmental quality in an oligopolistic market. We model two firms that compete on environmental quality and greenwashing levels, operating under the oversight of a regulatory authority. The authority’s policy instruments include a detection mechanism and fines imposed on firms engaging in greenwashing. Using a differential game-theoretical framework, we examine the effectiveness of regulatory interventions like detection and penalties in reducing greenwashing behavior and enhancing environmental quality. Additionally, we discuss the post-detection trajectories of both firms, providing insights into the effects on consumer perceptions and market competition. We find that while regulation can reduce greenwashing as expected, it may also reduce firms’ environmental quality efforts. Indeed, when penalties are sufficiently high, the marginal returns on investment in greenwashing exceed those from actual green quality improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Arka Mukherjee & Subhadip Ghosh, 2025. "Greenwashing Risks in Environmental Quality Competition: Detection and Deterrence," Games, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:14-:d:1610078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/16/2/14/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/16/2/14/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrei Shleifer, 2004. "Does Competition Destroy Ethical Behavior?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(2), pages 414-418, May.
    2. Tsur, Yacov & Zemel, Amos, 1998. "Pollution control in an uncertain environment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 967-975, June.
    3. Nkuiya, Bruno, 2015. "Transboundary pollution game with potential shift in damages," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-14.
    4. Célia Santos & Arnaldo Coelho & Alzira Marques, 2024. "A systematic literature review on greenwashing and its relationship to stakeholders: state of art and future research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 1397-1421, September.
    5. Dockner,Engelbert J. & Jorgensen,Steffen & Long,Ngo Van & Sorger,Gerhard, 2000. "Differential Games in Economics and Management Science," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521637329, Enero.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Insley, Margaret & A. Forsyth, Peter, 2019. "Climate games: Who’s on first? What’s on second?," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 95(2-3), pages 287-322, Juin-Sept.
    2. Markus Eigruber & Franz Wirl, 2020. "Cheating as a dynamic marketing strategy in monopoly, cartel and duopoly," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 461-478, June.
    3. Nkuiya, Bruno, 2020. "Tradeoffs between costly capacity investment and risk of regime shift," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 117-127.
    4. Nkuiya, Bruno & Costello, Christopher, 2016. "Pollution control under a possible future shift in environmental preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(PB), pages 193-205.
    5. Raoul Boucekkine & Weiha Ruan & Benteng Zou, 2023. "Optimal behavior under pollution irreversibility risk and distance to the irreversibility thresholds: A global approach," DEM Discussion Paper Series 23-16, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    6. Margaret Insley & Tracy Snoddon & Peter A. Forsyth, 2018. "Strategic interactions and uncertainty in decisions to curb greenhouse gas emissions," Working Papers 1805, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised 06 Jan 2018.
    7. Miller, Steve & Nkuiya, Bruno, 2016. "Coalition formation in fisheries with potential regime shift," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 189-207.
    8. Ni, Jian & Huang, Hongzhi & Wang, Peipei & Zhou, Wei, 2020. "Capacity investment and green R&D in a dynamic oligopoly under the potential shift in environmental damage," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 312-319.
    9. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2019. "General analysis of dynamic oligopoly with sticky price," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(4), pages 2990-2998.
    10. Bommier, Antoine & Lanz, Bruno & Zuber, Stéphane, 2015. "Models-as-usual for unusual risks? On the value of catastrophic climate change," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-22.
    11. Luca Lambertini & Arsen Palestini & Alessandro Tampieri, 2016. "CSR in an Asymmetric Duopoly with Environmental Externality," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(1), pages 236-252, July.
    12. Açıkgöz, Ömer T. & Benchekroun, Hassan, 2017. "Anticipated international environmental agreements," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 306-336.
    13. Lamar Pierce & Jason Snyder, 2015. "Unethical Demand and Employee Turnover," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(4), pages 853-869, November.
    14. Acharya, Viral & Jiang, Zhengyang & Richmond, Robert & von Thadden, Ernst-Ludwig, 2024. "International Policy Coordination in a Multisectoral Model of Trade and Health Policy," CEPR Discussion Papers 19149, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Ahlin, Christian & Kim, In Kyung & Kim, Kyoo il, 2021. "Who commits fraud? evidence from korean gas stations," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. Xiaochi Wu, 2022. "Existence of value for a differential game with asymmetric information and signal revealing," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 51(1), pages 213-247, March.
    17. Régis Chenavaz & Corina Paraschiv & Gabriel Turinici, 2017. "Dynamic Pricing of New Products in Competitive Markets: A Mean-Field Game Approach," Working Papers hal-01592958, HAL.
    18. Reinhard Neck & Dmitri Blueschke, 2014. "“Haircuts” for the EMU periphery: virtue or vice?," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 41(2), pages 153-175, May.
    19. Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Working Papers 267, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    20. Guillaume Bataille & Benteng Zou, 2024. "International Fisheries Agreements: Endogenous Exits, Shapley Values, and Moratorium Fishing Policy," Working Papers hal-04659454, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:14-:d:1610078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.