IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v8y2015i10p11076-11094d56787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Environmental Indicator for Urban Transportation Systems: Description and Application

Author

Listed:
  • Maria La Gennusa

    (Dipartimento di Energia, ingegneria dell'Informazione e modelli Matematici (DEIM), Polytechnic School, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 9, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Patrizia Ferrante

    (Dipartimento di Energia, ingegneria dell'Informazione e modelli Matematici (DEIM), Polytechnic School, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 9, 90128 Palermo, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Barbara Lo Casto

    (Dipartimento di Energia, ingegneria dell'Informazione e modelli Matematici (DEIM), Polytechnic School, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 9, 90128 Palermo, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Gianfranco Rizzo

    (Dipartimento di Energia, ingegneria dell'Informazione e modelli Matematici (DEIM), Polytechnic School, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 9, 90128 Palermo, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

A simplified version of the ecological footprint method is proposed for assessing the environmental performances of urban transportation systems. The method, starting from the knowledge of the composition of the running vehicular fleet, is here applied to a southern Italian province. It represents a synthetic indicator of the environmental pressure exerted by the system also matching the pollutant emissions with the carrying capacity of the site. Particularly, the forested area needed to absorb the CO 2 emissions of the system is compared with the total forested area of the province. The results of the case-study indicates the yearly maximum distance that each vehicle of the fleet can cover in order for their emissions to be absorbed by the surrounding forested area. Specifically, if all cars of the fleet would travel for 10,000 km/year, 97% of the forested area would be involved. Thanks to its features, this indicator can be usefully adopted for ranking different transportation options. Therefore, it could allow local administrations to environmentally hierarchize alternative plans concerning urban transportation choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria La Gennusa & Patrizia Ferrante & Barbara Lo Casto & Gianfranco Rizzo, 2015. "An Integrated Environmental Indicator for Urban Transportation Systems: Description and Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:10:p:11076-11094:d:56787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/10/11076/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/10/11076/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gössling, Stefan & Cohen, Scott, 2014. "Why sustainable transport policies will fail: EU climate policy in the light of transport taboos," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 197-207.
    2. Amekudzi, Adjo A. & Jotin Khisty, C. & Khayesi, Meleckidzedeck, 2009. "Using the sustainability footprint model to assess development impacts of transportation systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 339-348, May.
    3. Dongquan He & Fei Meng & Michael Q. Wang & Kebin He, 2011. "Impacts of Urban Transportation Mode Split on CO 2 Emissions in Jinan, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Brett Williams & Elliot Martin & Timothy Lipman & Daniel Kammen, 2011. "Plug-in-Hybrid Vehicle Use, Energy Consumption, and Greenhouse Emissions: An Analysis of Household Vehicle Placements in Northern California," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Marco Guerrieri & Ferdinando Corriere & Gianfranco Rizzo & Barbara Lo Casto & Gianluca Scaccianoce, 2015. "Improving the Sustainability of Transportation: Environmental and Functional Benefits of Right Turn By-Pass Lanes at Roundabouts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Timothy Waring & Mario Teisl & Eva Manandhar & Mark Anderson, 2014. "On the Travel Emissions of Sustainability Science Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-18, May.
    7. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt6xt6d5jv is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Morten Simonsen & Hans Jakob Walnum, 2011. "Energy Chain Analysis of Passenger Car Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-28, February.
    9. Cheng Gong & Shiwen Zhang & Feng Zhang & Jianguo Jiang & Xinheng Wang, 2014. "An Integrated Energy-Efficient Operation Methodology for Metro Systems Based on a Real Case of Shanghai Metro Line One," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-25, November.
    10. Nuwong Chollacoop & Peerawat Saisirirat & Tuenjai Fukuda & Atsushi Fukuda, 2011. "Scenario Analyses of Road Transport Energy Demand: A Case Study of Ethanol as a Diesel Substitute in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Paul Minett & John Pearce, 2011. "Estimating the Energy Consumption Impact of Casual Carpooling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Elliot Martin & Susan Shaheen, 2011. "The Impact of Carsharing on Public Transit and Non-Motorized Travel: An Exploration of North American Carsharing Survey Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian Wu & Hongmei Zhao & Xunmin Ou, 2014. "Vehicle Ownership Analysis Based on GDP per Capita in China: 1963–2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Albrecht, Amie & Howlett, Phil & Pudney, Peter & Vu, Xuan & Zhou, Peng, 2016. "The key principles of optimal train control—Part 1: Formulation of the model, strategies of optimal type, evolutionary lines, location of optimal switching points," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 482-508.
    3. Aryana Soliz, 2021. "Creating Sustainable Cities through Cycling Infrastructure? Learning from Insurgent Mobilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Caris, Ethan & Cao, Mengqiu, 2024. "Investigating contestation around neighbourhood scale active travel infrastructure policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 95-107.
    5. Jin Xue & Hans Jakob Walnum & Carlo Aall & Petter Næss, 2016. "Two Contrasting Scenarios for a Zero-Emission Future in a High-Consumption Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Zuiyi Shen & Qianqian Zhao & Qimin Fang, 2021. "Analysis of Green Traffic Development in Zhoushan Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Dennis Dreier & Mark Howells, 2019. "OSeMOSYS-PuLP: A Stochastic Modeling Framework for Long-Term Energy Systems Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, April.
    8. Haarstad, Håvard & Sareen, Siddharth & Kandt, Jens & Coenen, Lars & Cook, Matthew, 2022. "Beyond automobility? Lock-in of past failures in low-carbon urban mobility innovations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    9. Zhu, Zheng & Qin, Xiaoran & Ke, Jintao & Zheng, Zhengfei & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Analysis of multi-modal commute behavior with feeding and competing ridesplitting services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 713-727.
    10. Bilong Shen & Weimin Zheng & Kathleen M. Carley, 2018. "Urban Activity Mining Framework for Ride Sharing Systems Based on Vehicular Social Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 705-734, September.
    11. Stokkink, Patrick & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2021. "Predictive user-based relocation through incentives in one-way car-sharing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 230-249.
    12. Qian Duan & Xin Ye & Jian Li & Ke Wang, 2020. "Empirical Modeling Analysis of Potential Commute Demand for Carsharing in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Fei Lin & Shihui Liu & Zhihong Yang & Yingying Zhao & Zhongping Yang & Hu Sun, 2016. "Multi-Train Energy Saving for Maximum Usage of Regenerative Energy by Dwell Time Optimization in Urban Rail Transit Using Genetic Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Yu, Biying & Ma, Ye & Xue, Meimei & Tang, Baojun & Wang, Bin & Yan, Jinyue & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Environmental benefits from ridesharing: A case of Beijing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 141-152.
    15. Echeverría, Lucía & Gimenez-Nadal, J. Ignacio & Molina, José Alberto, 2021. "Carpooling: User profiles and well-being," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3568, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    16. Diab, Ehab & Kasraian, Dena & Miller, Eric J. & Shalaby, Amer, 2020. "The rise and fall of transit ridership across Canada: Understanding the determinants," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 101-112.
    17. Weibo Li & Maria Kamargianni, 2020. "Steering short-term demand for car-sharing: a mode choice and policy impact analysis by trip distance," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2233-2265, October.
    18. Zhou, Fan & Zheng, Zuduo & Whitehead, Jake & Washington, Simon & Perrons, Robert K. & Page, Lionel, 2020. "Preference heterogeneity in mode choice for car-sharing and shared automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 633-650.
    19. Luca Nitschke, 2020. "Reconstituting Automobility: The Influence of Non-Commercial Carsharing on the Meanings of Automobility and the Car," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Daniel Neves Schmitz Gonçalves & Renata Albergaria de Mello Bandeira & Mariane Gonzalez da Costa & George Vasconcelos Goes & Tássia Faria de Assis & Márcio de Almeida D’Agosto & Isabela Rocha Pombo Le, 2020. "A Multitier Approach to Estimating the Energy Efficiency of Urban Passenger Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:10:p:11076-11094:d:56787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.