IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i9p2292-d1646394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydrogen and Ammonia Production and Transportation from Offshore Wind Farms: A Techno-Economic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Farhan Haider Joyo

    (Department of Astronautical Electrical & Energy Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Andrea Falasco

    (Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Daniele Groppi

    (Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Adriana Scarlet Sferra

    (Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Davide Astiaso Garcia

    (Department of Astronautical Electrical & Energy Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Offshore wind energy is increasingly considered a vital resource to contribute to the renewable energy future. This renewable energy can be converted to clean energy alternatives such as hydrogen and ammonia via power-to-x technologies, enabling storage, energy security, and decarbonization of hard-to-abate sectors. This study assesses the techno-economic feasibility of integrating offshore wind energy with hydrogen and ammonia production as sustainable energy carriers and their transportation via pipelines or shipping. The methodology incorporates Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) electrolysis for hydrogen production, seawater desalination, and the Haber–Bosch process for ammonia production. Offshore transport scenarios are compared to evaluate their cost-effectiveness based on distance and electrolyzer capacity. Results show the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH 2 ) ranges from EUR 6.7 to 9.8/kg (EUR 0.20–0.29/kWh), and the levelized cost of ammonia (LCOA) ranges from EUR 1.9 to 2.8/kg (EUR 0.37–0.55/kWh). Transportation costs vary significantly with distance and electrolyzer capacity, with levelized cost of transport (LCOT) between EUR 0.2 and 15/kg for pipelines and EUR 0.3 and 10.2/kg for shipping. Also, for distances up to 500 km, pipeline transport is the most cost-effective option for both hydrogen and ammonia. Despite high production costs, economies of scale and technological improvements can make offshore hydrogen and ammonia a promising means for a sustainable energy future.

Suggested Citation

  • Farhan Haider Joyo & Andrea Falasco & Daniele Groppi & Adriana Scarlet Sferra & Davide Astiaso Garcia, 2025. "Hydrogen and Ammonia Production and Transportation from Offshore Wind Farms: A Techno-Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-27, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2292-:d:1646394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2292/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2292/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bosch, Jonathan & Staffell, Iain & Hawkes, Adam D., 2019. "Global levelised cost of electricity from offshore wind," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Wang, Yifei & Dong, Guangzhong & Yu, Jincheng & Qin, Caiyan & Feng, Yu & Deng, Yanfei & Zhang, Mingming, 2025. "In-situ green hydrogen production from offshore wind farms, a prospective review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Dong, Cong & Huang, Guohe (Gordon) & Cheng, Guanhui, 2021. "Offshore wind can power Canada," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    4. Lucas, Tiago R. & Ferreira, Ana F. & Santos Pereira, R.B. & Alves, Marco, 2022. "Hydrogen production from the WindFloat Atlantic offshore wind farm: A techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    5. Aneke, Mathew & Wang, Meihong, 2016. "Energy storage technologies and real life applications – A state of the art review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 350-377.
    6. Fasihi, Mahdi & Weiss, Robert & Savolainen, Jouni & Breyer, Christian, 2021. "Global potential of green ammonia based on hybrid PV-wind power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    7. Topham, Eva & McMillan, David & Bradley, Stuart & Hart, Edward, 2019. "Recycling offshore wind farms at decommissioning stage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 698-709.
    8. Shaojie Song & Haiyang Lin & Peter Sherman & Xi Yang & Chris P. Nielsen & Xinyu Chen & Michael B. McElroy, 2021. "Production of hydrogen from offshore wind in China and cost-competitive supply to Japan," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    9. Youngkyun Seo & Jiyoung An & Eunyoung Park & Jintae Kim & Meangik Cho & Seongjong Han & Jinkwang Lee, 2024. "Technical–Economic Analysis for Ammonia Ocean Transportation Using an Ammonia-Fueled Carrier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gulagi, Ashish & Keiner, Dominik & Canessa, Rafaella & Satymov, Rasul & ElSayed, Mai & Peer, Rebecca & Haas, Jannik & Breyer, Christian, 2025. "Analysing techno-economic impacts of integrating wave power to achieve carbon neutrality and electricity based fuel exports: A case for New Zealand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    2. Wang, Yifei & Dong, Guangzhong & Yu, Jincheng & Qin, Caiyan & Feng, Yu & Deng, Yanfei & Zhang, Mingming, 2025. "In-situ green hydrogen production from offshore wind farms, a prospective review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Shamsan Alsubal & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Eu Lim Shawn & M. S. Liew & Pavitirakumar Palaniappan & Muhammad Ali Musarat, 2021. "Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Offshore Wind Farm: Kudat Malaysia Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Carlo James Cunanan & Carlos Andrés Elorza Casas & Mitchell Yorke & Michael Fowler & Xiao-Yu Wu, 2022. "Design and Analysis of an Offshore Wind Power to Ammonia Production System in Nova Scotia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Yingying Du & Hui Huang & Haibin Liu & Jingying Zhao & Qingzhou Yang, 2024. "Life Cycle Assessment of Abandonment of Onshore Wind Power for Hydrogen Production in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Johnston, Barry & Foley, Aoife & Doran, John & Littler, Timothy, 2020. "Levelised cost of energy, A challenge for offshore wind," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 876-885.
    7. Klaudia Ligęza & Mariusz Łaciak & Bartłomiej Ligęza, 2023. "Centralized Offshore Hydrogen Production from Wind Farms in the Baltic Sea Area—A Study Case for Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Rogeau, Antoine & Vieubled, Julien & de Coatpont, Matthieu & Affonso Nobrega, Pedro & Erbs, Guillaume & Girard, Robin, 2023. "Techno-economic evaluation and resource assessment of hydrogen production through offshore wind farms: A European perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Miguel J. Prieto & Juan Á. Martínez & Rogelio Peón & Lourdes Á. Barcia & Fernando Nuño, 2017. "On the Convenience of Using Simulation Models to Optimize the Control Strategy of Molten-Salt Heat Storage Systems in Solar Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    11. Barelli, L. & Bidini, G. & Bonucci, F. & Castellini, L. & Fratini, A. & Gallorini, F. & Zuccari, A., 2019. "Flywheel hybridization to improve battery life in energy storage systems coupled to RES plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 937-950.
    12. Hossein Lotfi & Mohammad Hasan Nikkhah, 2024. "Multi-Objective Profit-Based Unit Commitment with Renewable Energy and Energy Storage Units Using a Modified Optimization Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-28, February.
    13. Liu, Jicheng & Sun, Jiakang & Yuan, Hanying & Su, Yihan & Feng, Shuxian & Lu, Chaoran, 2022. "Behavior analysis of photovoltaic-storage-use value chain game evolution in blockchain environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    14. Hossam M. Hussein & Ahmed Aghmadi & Mahmoud S. Abdelrahman & S M Sajjad Hossain Rafin & Osama Mohammed, 2024. "A review of battery state of charge estimation and management systems: Models and future prospective," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), January.
    15. Parwal, Arvind & Fregelius, Martin & Temiz, Irinia & Göteman, Malin & Oliveira, Janaina G. de & Boström, Cecilia & Leijon, Mats, 2018. "Energy management for a grid-connected wave energy park through a hybrid energy storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 399-411.
    16. Bossink, Bart A.G., 2017. "Demonstrating sustainable energy: A review based model of sustainable energy demonstration projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1349-1362.
    17. Ghosh, Sourav & Yadav, Sarita & Devi, Ambika & Thomas, Tiju, 2022. "Techno-economic understanding of Indian energy-storage market: A perspective on green materials-based supercapacitor technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Lopez, Gabriel & Galimova, Tansu & Fasihi, Mahdi & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2023. "Towards defossilised steel: Supply chain options for a green European steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    19. Wang, Shunchao, 2025. "Optimal sizing of Power-to-Ammonia plants: A stochastic two-stage mixed-integer programming approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    20. Winkler, Lorenz & Kilic, Onur A. & Veldman, Jasper, 2022. "Collaboration in the offshore wind farm decommissioning supply chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2292-:d:1646394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.