IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i9p2278-d1646066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scenarios of Carbon Capture and Storage Importance in the Process of Energy System Transformation in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Aurelia Rybak

    (Faculty of Mining, Safety Engineering and Industrial Automation, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Jarosław Joostberens

    (Faculty of Mining, Safety Engineering and Industrial Automation, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

Abstract

One of the most important issues in the coming years will be the decarbonisation of the European Union member states’ energy systems. The majority of the abstract requires modification. I propose that the first sentence of the abstract in the manuscript should better emphasize the formulation of the problem. The remaining part and any corrections were made by the author. Scenarios of the importance of CCS in the process of transformation of energy systems in Poland. One of the most important issues in the coming years will be the transformation of the energy systems of the European Union’s member states, which will require the development of appropriate technological solutions. The research presented here analyses the importance of CCS in energy transformation. This article proposes adapting the energy transformation method to the structure of the energy mix and conditions prevailing in a specific country. Poland was adopted as an example for analysis due to its exceptionally complicated situation, taking into account the structure of energy production. For this purpose, an expert opinion survey was conducted. Both measurable variables, such as the volume of CO 2 emissions and EU ETS prices, and a qualitative variable, i.e., the impact of the political environment on the development of CCS, were introduced to the constructed model. The model allowed us to construct three scenarios describing alternative visions for the future development of CCS: optimistic, pessimistic, and neutral, taking into account different conditions in which CCS can develop. The use of fuzzy sets allowed us to eliminate the most serious drawback of planning scenarios based on expert knowledge, which is the subjectivity of their judgments. This research showed that stable conditions of the political environment and predictable legal regulations will be crucial for the application of CCS in the Polish energy sector. The prepared scenarios will enable a quick response and accurate decisions under various conditions of the turbulent environment. This will facilitate the preparation of energy strategies. The scenarios indicate what combinations of variables, under given environmental conditions, of CCS will be of great importance in the energy transformation, and when it may give way to other technologies. In addition, the scenarios, and especially their visualisation, are extremely valuable for stakeholders, because they will allow them to observe the potential development of the situation under known conditions of the political environment, prices, and CO 2 emissions. They enable understanding the dependence of the importance of CCS in the changing environment. They also enable the detection of critical points for the development of CCS, which, as a result of recent geopolitical events, may be of key importance in the near future for ensuring the energy and military security of Poland and the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurelia Rybak & Jarosław Joostberens, 2025. "Scenarios of Carbon Capture and Storage Importance in the Process of Energy System Transformation in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2278-:d:1646066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2278/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2278/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Yongge & Hou, Jian & Zhao, Haifeng & Liu, Xiaoyu & Xia, Zhizeng, 2018. "A method to recover natural gas hydrates with geothermal energy conveyed by CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 265-278.
    2. Christiano B. Peres & Pedro M. R. Resende & Leonel J. R. Nunes & Leandro C. de Morais, 2022. "Advances in Carbon Capture and Use (CCU) Technologies: A Comprehensive Review and CO 2 Mitigation Potential Analysis," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Sylwia Mrozowska & Jan A. Wendt & Krzysztof Tomaszewski, 2021. "The Challenges of Poland’s Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Flori, Andrea & Borghesi, Simone & Marin, Giovanni, 2024. "The environmental-financial performance nexus of EU ETS firms: A quantile regression approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Paul E. Hardisty & Mayuran Sivapalan & Peter Brooks, 2011. "The Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Carbon Capture and Storage," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Małgorzata Błażejowska & Anna Czarny & Iwona Kowalska & Andrzej Michalczewski & Paweł Stępień, 2024. "The Effectiveness of the EU ETS Policy in Changing the Energy Mix in Selected European Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Michał Kopacz & Dominika Matuszewska & Piotr Olczak, 2024. "Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Implementation as a Method of Reducing Emissions from Coal Thermal Power Plants in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Blaschke, Wieslaw & Nycz, Ryszard, 2003. "Clean coal-preparation barriers in Poland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(3-4), pages 343-348, March.
    9. Chen, Wenying & Xu, Ruina, 2010. "Clean coal technology development in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2123-2130, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aurelia Rybak & Aleksandra Rybak & Jarosław Joostberens, 2024. "The Role of Clean Coal Technologies in the Development of Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Mo, Jian-Lei & Schleich, Joachim & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 255-264.
    3. Wan, Kun & Wu, Tian-Wei & Wang, Yi & Li, Xiao-Sen & Liu, Jian-Wu & Kou, Xuan & Feng, Jing-Chun, 2023. "Large-scale experimental study of heterogeneity in different types of hydrate reservoirs by horizontal well depressurization method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    4. Xiang, Yue & Guo, Yongtao & Wu, Gang & Liu, Junyong & Sun, Wei & Lei, Yutian & Zeng, Pingliang, 2022. "Low-carbon economic planning of integrated electricity-gas energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Xiaowei Song & Yongpei Hao & Xiaodong Zhu, 2019. "Air Pollutant Emissions from Vehicles and Their Abatement Scenarios: A Case Study of Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Henryk Łukowicz & Łukasz Bartela & Paweł Gładysz & Staffan Qvist, 2023. "Repowering a Coal Power Plant Steam Cycle Using Modular Light-Water Reactor Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-25, March.
    7. Li, X. & Hubacek, K. & Siu, Y.L., 2012. "Wind power in China – Dream or reality?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 51-60.
    8. Enci Wang & Jianyun Nie & Hong Zhan, 2022. "The Impact of Carbon Emissions Trading on the Profitability and Debt Burden of Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Hoffmann, Bettina Susanne & Szklo, Alexandre, 2011. "Integrated gasification combined cycle and carbon capture: A risky option to mitigate CO2 emissions of coal-fired power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3917-3929.
    10. Zhang, Bin & Lu, Danting & He, Yan & Chiu, Yung-ho, 2018. "The efficiencies of resource-saving and environment: A case study based on Chinese cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 493-507.
    11. Laëtitia Guilhot, 2022. "An analysis of China's energy policy from 1981 to 2020: Transitioning towards to a diversified and low-carbon energy system," Post-Print halshs-03548757, HAL.
    12. Alina Ilinova & Natalia Romasheva & Alexey Cherepovitsyn, 2021. "CC(U)S Initiatives: Public Effects and “Combined Value” Performance," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Lisiak-Zielińska, Marta & Jałoszyńska, Sylwia & Borowiak, Klaudia & Budka, Anna & Dach, Jacek, 2023. "Perception of biogas plants: A public awareness and preference - A case study for the agricultural landscape," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    14. Zhongxu Lu & Yang Yang & Yajun Mo & Haizhi Liao & Youlian Cai, 2025. "Investigation and Evaluation of Geothermal Resources in Northern Shanxi Province, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Xu Tang & Benjamin C. McLellan & Simon Snowden & Baosheng Zhang & Mikael Höök, 2015. "Dilemmas for China: Energy, Economy and Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-13, May.
    16. Xiangyu Teng & Fan‐peng Liu & Yung‐ho Chiu, 2020. "The impact of coal and non‐coal consumption on China's energy performance improvement," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(4), pages 334-352, November.
    17. Enemuo, Michael & Ogunmodimu, Olumide, 2025. "Transitioning the mining sector: A review of renewable energy integration and carbon footprint reduction strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    18. Coilín ÓhAiseadha & Gerré Quinn & Ronan Connolly & Michael Connolly & Willie Soon, 2020. "Energy and Climate Policy—An Evaluation of Global Climate Change Expenditure 2011–2018," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-49, September.
    19. Męczyński Michał & Ciesiółka Przemysław, 2022. "Regional Green Transition: Cases of Polish and Russian Regions," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 41(4), pages 165-177, December.
    20. Erdong Yao & Hang Xu & Yuan Li & Xuesong Ren & Hao Bai & Fujian Zhou, 2021. "Reusing Flowback and Produced Water with Different Salinity to Prepare Guar Fracturing Fluid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2278-:d:1646066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.