IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i9p2200-d1642873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Development Potential of Shallow Geothermal Energy Heating and Cooling Projects in Southern China Based on Whole-Lifecycle Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Yiqirui Deng

    (114 Branch, Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development of Guizhou Province, Zunyi 563006, China
    Guizhou Shallow Geothermal Energy Development Co., Ltd., Zunyi 563006, China)

  • Zhi Yao

    (State Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, Guizhou University and Ministry of Science and Technology, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Mengyu Chen

    (School of Management, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Yu-Jie Hu

    (State Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, Guizhou University and Ministry of Science and Technology, Guiyang 550025, China
    School of Management, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

Abstract

The development of shallow geothermal energy projects in southern China can meet the demand for regional heating and cooling energy and carbon emission reduction. However, research on constructing evaluation models for the development potential of shallow geothermal energy projects needs to be expanded. Therefore, this study adopted a hierarchical analysis method to construct a project development potential evaluation model based on the four aspects of resource endowment, economic evaluation, environmental impact, and social support for the shallow geothermal energy heating and cooling project (vertical buried pipe heat exchange system) in southern China and carried out case application and evaluation verification. The results of the study show that: (a) the weights of the four primary indicators for evaluating the development potential of shallow geothermal energy projects in southern China were resource endowment (0.3960) > economic evaluation (0.2847) > social support (0.1725) > environmental impact (0.1468); (b) four secondary indicators, namely heat exchange performance, incentive and supportive policies, geotechnical and thermal-physical parameters, and groundwater conditions, were more important; (c) the case evaluation score was 6.2911, and case application and evaluation verification were carried out. For projects with good potential for investment, contrary to the single financial NPV index evaluation results, our results are more in line with the actual operation results of the project. Thus, this evaluation system can provide a more comprehensive reference for shallow geothermal energy development and investment decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiqirui Deng & Zhi Yao & Mengyu Chen & Yu-Jie Hu, 2025. "Assessment of the Development Potential of Shallow Geothermal Energy Heating and Cooling Projects in Southern China Based on Whole-Lifecycle Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2200-:d:1642873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belliardi, Marco & Caputo, Paola & Ferla, Giulio & Cereghetti, Nerio & Antonioli Mantegazzini, Barbara, 2023. "An innovative application of 5GDHC: A techno-economic assessment of shallow geothermal systems potential in different European climates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    2. Galgaro, A. & Di Sipio, E. & Carrera, A. & Dalla Santa, G. & Escudero, A. Ramos & Cuevas, J.M. & Pasquali, R. & Sanner, B. & Bernardi, A., 2022. "European and municipal scale drillability maps: A tool to identify the most suitable techniques to install borehole heat exchangers (BHE) probes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 188-199.
    3. Hähnlein, Stefanie & Bayer, Peter & Ferguson, Grant & Blum, Philipp, 2013. "Sustainability and policy for the thermal use of shallow geothermal energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 914-925.
    4. Jiulong Liu & Shuangbao Han & Hong Xiang & Dongdong Yue & Fengtian Yang, 2023. "The Resource Potential and Zoning Evaluation for Deep Geothermal Resources of the Dongying Formation in Tianjin Binhai New Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Adela Ramos-Escudero & M. Socorro García-Cascales & Javier F. Urchueguía, 2021. "Evaluation of the Shallow Geothermal Potential for Heating and Cooling and Its Integration in the Socioeconomic Environment: A Case Study in the Region of Murcia, Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Saner, Dominik & Juraske, Ronnie & Kübert, Markus & Blum, Philipp & Hellweg, Stefanie & Bayer, Peter, 2010. "Is it only CO2 that matters? A life cycle perspective on shallow geothermal systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 1798-1813, September.
    7. D'Agostino, D. & Minichiello, F. & Petito, F. & Renno, C. & Valentino, A., 2022. "Retrofit strategies to obtain a NZEB using low enthalpy geothermal energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    8. Luo, Jin & Luo, Zequan & Xie, Jihai & Xia, Dongsheng & Huang, Wei & Shao, Haibin & Xiang, Wei & Rohn, Joachim, 2018. "Investigation of shallow geothermal potentials for different types of ground source heat pump systems (GSHP) of Wuhan city in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 230-244.
    9. Casasso, Alessandro & Sethi, Rajandrea, 2016. "G.POT: A quantitative method for the assessment and mapping of the shallow geothermal potential," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 765-773.
    10. Alessandro Sbrana & Paola Marianelli & Giuseppe Pasquini & Paolo Costantini & Francesco Palmieri & Valentina Ciani & Michele Sbrana, 2018. "The Integration of 3D Modeling and Simulation to Determine the Energy Potential of Low-Temperature Geothermal Systems in the Pisa (Italy) Sedimentary Plain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Chen, Siyuan & Zhang, Qi & Li, Hailong & Mclellan, Benjamin & Zhang, Tiantian & Tan, Zhizhou, 2019. "Investment decision on shallow geothermal heating & cooling based on compound options model: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    12. Korhonen, Kimmo & Markó, Ábel & Bischoff, Alan & Szijártó, Márk & Mádl-Szőnyi, Judit, 2023. "Infinite borehole field model—a new approach to estimate the shallow geothermal potential of urban areas applied to central Budapest, Hungary," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 263-274.
    13. Thomas Hermans & Frédéric Nguyen & Tanguy Robert & Andre Revil, 2014. "Geophysical Methods for Monitoring Temperature Changes in Shallow Low Enthalpy Geothermal Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-36, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Somogyi, Viola & Sebestyén, Viktor & Nagy, Georgina, 2017. "Scientific achievements and regulation of shallow geothermal systems in six European countries – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 934-952.
    2. Elisa Heim & Marius Laska & Ralf Becker & Norbert Klitzsch, 2022. "Estimating the Subsurface Thermal Conductivity and Its Uncertainty for Shallow Geothermal Energy Use—A Workflow and Geoportal Based on Publicly Available Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Tissen, Carolin & Menberg, Kathrin & Benz, Susanne A. & Bayer, Peter & Steiner, Cornelia & Götzl, Gregor & Blum, Philipp, 2021. "Identifying key locations for shallow geothermal use in Vienna," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1-19.
    4. Bayer, Peter & Attard, Guillaume & Blum, Philipp & Menberg, Kathrin, 2019. "The geothermal potential of cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 17-30.
    5. Böttcher, Fabian & Casasso, Alessandro & Götzl, Gregor & Zosseder, Kai, 2019. "TAP - Thermal aquifer Potential: A quantitative method to assess the spatial potential for the thermal use of groundwater," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 85-95.
    6. Francesco, Tinti & Annamaria, Pangallo & Martina, Berneschi & Dario, Tosoni & Dušan, Rajver & Simona, Pestotnik & Dalibor, Jovanović & Tomislav, Rudinica & Slavisa, Jelisić & Branko, Zlokapa & Attilio, 2016. "How to boost shallow geothermal energy exploitation in the adriatic area: the LEGEND project experience," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 190-204.
    7. Walch, Alina & Li, Xiang & Chambers, Jonathan & Mohajeri, Nahid & Yilmaz, Selin & Patel, Martin & Scartezzini, Jean-Louis, 2022. "Shallow geothermal energy potential for heating and cooling of buildings with regeneration under climate change scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    8. Miocic, Johannes M. & Krecher, Marc, 2022. "Estimation of shallow geothermal potential to meet building heating demand on a regional scale," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 629-640.
    9. Yiqirui Deng & Mengyu Chen & Yujie Hu, 2025. "Assessment of Shallow Geothermal Development Potential Based on the Entropy Weight TOPSIS Method—A Case Study of Guizhou Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Thomas Hermans & Frédéric Nguyen & Tanguy Robert & Andre Revil, 2014. "Geophysical Methods for Monitoring Temperature Changes in Shallow Low Enthalpy Geothermal Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-36, August.
    11. De Schepper, Guillaume & Paulus, Claire & Bolly, Pierre-Yves & Hermans, Thomas & Lesparre, Nolwenn & Robert, Tanguy, 2019. "Assessment of short-term aquifer thermal energy storage for demand-side management perspectives: Experimental and numerical developments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 534-546.
    12. Kljajić, Miroslav V. & Anđelković, Aleksandar S. & Hasik, Vaclav & Munćan, Vladimir M. & Bilec, Melissa, 2020. "Shallow geothermal energy integration in district heating system: An example from Serbia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P2), pages 2791-2800.
    13. Wengang Qu & Chao Yang & Hui Qian & Panpan Xu & Yanyan Gao & Leiqiang Wei & Qi Long, 2024. "Geothermal Condition Investigation and Resource Potential Evaluation of Shallow Geothermal Energy in the Yinchuan Area, Ningxia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-30, December.
    14. Anis Akrouch, Ghassan & Sánchez, Marcelo & Briaud, Jean-Louis, 2020. "Thermal performance and economic study of an energy piles system under cooling dominated conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P2), pages 2736-2747.
    15. Marco Taussi & Walter Borghi & Michele Gliaschera & Alberto Renzulli, 2021. "Defining the Shallow Geothermal Heat-Exchange Potential for a Lower Fluvial Plain of the Central Apennines: The Metauro Valley (Marche Region, Italy)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Pan, Shu-Yuan & Gao, Mengyao & Shah, Kinjal J. & Zheng, Jianming & Pei, Si-Lu & Chiang, Pen-Chi, 2019. "Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: Barriers and strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 19-32.
    17. Casasso, Alessandro & Sethi, Rajandrea, 2017. "Assessment and mapping of the shallow geothermal potential in the province of Cuneo (Piedmont, NW Italy)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 306-315.
    18. Ruoxi Yuan & Guiling Wang & Bowen Xu & Sumin Zhao & Xi Zhu & Wei Zhang & Wenjing Lin & Honglei Shi, 2025. "Using System Dynamics to Analyze Influencing Factors and Emission Reduction Potential of Geothermal Resources Development and Utilization in Tianjin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, April.
    19. Anand, R.S. & Li, Ang & Huang, Wenbo & Chen, Juanwen & Li, Zhibin & Ma, Qingshan & Jiang, Fangming, 2024. "Super-long gravity heat pipe for geothermal energy exploitation - A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Adela Ramos-Escudero & María del Socorro García-Cascales, 2022. "Barriers behind the Retarded Shallow Geothermal Deployment in Specific Areas: A Comparative Case Study between Southern Spain and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2200-:d:1642873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.