IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4312-d1652496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Shallow Geothermal Development Potential Based on the Entropy Weight TOPSIS Method—A Case Study of Guizhou Province

Author

Listed:
  • Yiqirui Deng

    (114 Branch, Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development Guizhou Province, Zunyi 563006, China
    Guizhou Shallow Geothermal Energy Development Co., Ltd., Zunyi 563006, China)

  • Mengyu Chen

    (School of Management, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Yujie Hu

    (School of Management, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

Abstract

Shallow geothermal energy is a renewable and clean resource, yet its potential varies significantly across different regions of China. The disparity in resource conditions, technology development, and the level of regional understanding regarding its potential hinder efficient utilization. This study applies the entropy weight method, combined with the TOPSIS model, to assess the shallow geothermal utilization potential across various regions of the country, with a case study in Guizhou Province employed to evaluate the actual development potential. Additionally, SWOT analysis is employed to assess regional development and provide recommendations for the future growth of shallow geothermal energy in Guizhou. The findings indicate a high potential for shallow geothermal energy in East China, with significant resource potential and conceivable economic benefits in Guizhou Province. This research not only evaluates the development potential for shallow geothermal energy in different regions but also proposes strategic recommendations to enhance its effective development and contribute to the high-quality transformation of the energy industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiqirui Deng & Mengyu Chen & Yujie Hu, 2025. "Assessment of Shallow Geothermal Development Potential Based on the Entropy Weight TOPSIS Method—A Case Study of Guizhou Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4312-:d:1652496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4312/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4312/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Puppala, Harish & Jha, Shibani K., 2018. "Identification of prospective significance levels for potential geothermal fields of India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 960-973.
    2. Zhi-Fu Mi & Yi-Ming Wei & Chen-Qi He & Hua-Nan Li & Xiao-Chen Yuan & Hua Liao, 2017. "Regional efforts to mitigate climate change in China: a multi-criteria assessment approach," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 45-66, January.
    3. Phadermrod, Boonyarat & Crowder, Richard M. & Wills, Gary B., 2019. "Importance-Performance Analysis based SWOT analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 194-203.
    4. Robert M X Wu & Zhongwu Zhang & Wanjun Yan & Jianfeng Fan & Jinwen Gou & Bao Liu & Ergun Gide & Jeffrey Soar & Bo Shen & Syed Fazal-e-Hasan & Zengquan Liu & Peng Zhang & Peilin Wang & Xinxin Cui & Zha, 2022. "A comparative analysis of the principal component analysis and entropy weight methods to establish the indexing measurement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Jiulong Liu & Shuangbao Han & Hong Xiang & Dongdong Yue & Fengtian Yang, 2023. "The Resource Potential and Zoning Evaluation for Deep Geothermal Resources of the Dongying Formation in Tianjin Binhai New Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. D'Agostino, D. & Minichiello, F. & Petito, F. & Renno, C. & Valentino, A., 2022. "Retrofit strategies to obtain a NZEB using low enthalpy geothermal energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    7. Da Huang & Mei Han, 2021. "Research on Evaluation Method of Freight Transportation Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Xiang, Dong & Qian, Yu & Man, Yi & Yang, Siyu, 2014. "Techno-economic analysis of the coal-to-olefins process in comparison with the oil-to-olefins process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 639-647.
    9. Dyson, Robert G., 2004. "Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(3), pages 631-640, February.
    10. Hu, Ziyuan & Gao, Zongjun & Xu, Xiqiang & Fang, Shaoyan & Zhou, Liangyu & Ji, Deshuai & Li, Fuquan & Feng, Jianguo & Wang, Min, 2022. "Suitability zoning of buried pipe ground source heat pump and shallow geothermal resource evaluation of Linqu County, Shandong Province, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 1430-1439.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Jie & Zhao, Narisa & Yang, Tong, 2024. "Wisdom of crowds: SWOT analysis based on hybrid text mining methods using online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Yuan Yuan & Tianhui You & Tian’ai Xu & Xun Yu, 2022. "Customer-Oriented Strategic Planning for Hotel Competitiveness Improvement Based on Online Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-30, November.
    3. Uzun, Bayram & Yıldırım, Volkan & Çoruhlu, Yakup Emre & Yıldız, Okan & Terzi, Fatih & Atasoy, Bura Adem, 2024. "Enhancing Turkish land readjustment via a combination of IPA-based on SWOT and workshops," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Yiqirui Deng & Zhi Yao & Mengyu Chen & Yu-Jie Hu, 2025. "Assessment of the Development Potential of Shallow Geothermal Energy Heating and Cooling Projects in Southern China Based on Whole-Lifecycle Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Zhen Zhao & Guangxiong Qin & Baizhong Yan & Chuanlong Han, 2025. "Evaluation of the Endowment of Geothermal Resources and Its Impact on Regional Industrial Structure: A Case Study of Qinghai Province (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Xingli Wu & Huchang Liao & Chonghui Zhang, 2024. "Importance-performance analysis to develop product/service improvement strategies through online reviews with reliability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(3), pages 1905-1924, November.
    7. Claudio Baudino & Nicole Roberta Giuggioli & Rossella Briano & Stefano Massaglia & Cristiana Peano, 2017. "Integrated Methodologies (SWOT, TOWS, LCA) for Improving Production Chains and Environmental Sustainability of Kiwifruit and Baby Kiwi in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Xie, Yiwei & Hu, Pingfang & Li, Siyi, 2024. "Development of a doubly-fed compound control for hybrid ground source heat pump systems in hot summer and cold winter areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PA).
    9. Liang-Ching Chen, 2023. "An Improved Corpus-Based NLP Method for Facilitating Keyword Extraction: An Example of the COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Corpus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Sepehr Ghazinoory & Mansoureh Abdi & Mandana Azadegan-Mehr, 2010. "Swot Methodology: A State-of-the-Art Review for the Past, A Framework for the Future," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 24-48, November.
    11. D'Agostino, D. & Minelli, F. & D'Urso, M. & Minichiello, F., 2022. "Fixed and tracking PV systems for Net Zero Energy Buildings: Comparison between yearly and monthly energy balance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 809-824.
    12. Alireza Radan & Milad Latifi & Minoo Moshtaghie & Mozhgan Ahmadi & Maryam Omidi, 2017. "Determining The Sensitive Conservative Site In Kolah Ghazi National Park, Iran, In Order To Management Wildlife By Using Gis Software," Environment & Ecosystem Science (EES), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 13-15, November.
    13. Edison Navarrete & Fernando Morante-Carballo & Jairo Dueñas-Tovar & Paúl Carrión-Mero & María Jaya-Montalvo & Edgar Berrezueta, 2022. "Assessment of Geosites within a Natural Protected Area: A Case Study of Cajas National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.
    14. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    15. Zhang, Wei & Wang, Nan, 2021. "Decomposition of energy intensity in Chinese industries using an extended LMDI method of production element endowment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    16. Ali Akbar Jamali & Ramin Tabatabaee & Timothy O. Randhir, 2021. "Ecotourism and socioeconomic strategies for Khansar River watershed of Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 17077-17093, November.
    17. Ali Mostafaeipour & Seyyed Jalaladdin Hosseini Dehshiri & Seyyed Shahabaddin Hosseini Dehshiri & Mehdi Jahangiri & Kuaanan Techato, 2020. "A Thorough Analysis of Potential Geothermal Project Locations in Afghanistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    19. Francesco Pagliacci & Leonardo Cei & Edi Defrancesco & Paola Gatto, 2022. "The EU Mountain Product Voluntary Quality Term as a Valorization Tool for Livestock Farms: Challenges and Opportunities in an Alpine Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Uroš Kramar & Dejan Dragan & Darja Topolšek, 2019. "The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-29, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4312-:d:1652496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.