IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i8p1957-d1632667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Strategic Selection of Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Technologies in Developing Countries Using a Fuzzy Decision Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulrahman AlKassem

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia
    Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering (CIISE), Concordia University, 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W., Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada)

  • Kamal Al-Haddad

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure (ETS), 1100 Notre-Dame St. W., Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)

  • Dragan Komljenovic

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure (ETS), 1100 Notre-Dame St. W., Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada
    Research Institute of Hydro-Québec (IREQ), 1800 Boulevard Lionel-Boulet, Varennes, QC J3X 1S1, Canada)

  • Andrea Schiffauerova

    (Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering (CIISE), Concordia University, 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W., Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada)

Abstract

Relative to other renewable energy technologies, concentrated solar power (CSP) is only in the beginning phases of large-scale deployment. Its incorporation into national grids is steadily growing, with anticipation of its substantial contribution to the energy mix. A number of emerging economies are situated in areas that receive abundant amounts of direct normal irradiance (DNI), which translates into expectations of significant effectiveness for CSP. However, any assessment related to the planning of CSP facilities is challenging because of the complexity of the associated criteria and the number of stakeholders. Additional complications are the differing concepts and configurations for CSP plants available, a dearth of related experience, and inadequate amounts of data in some developing countries. The goal of the work presented in this paper was to evaluate the practical CSP implementation options for such parts of the world. Ambiguity and imprecision issues were addressed through the application of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) in a fuzzy environment. Six technology combinations, involving dry cooling and varied installed capacity levels, were examined: three parabolic trough collectors with and without thermal storage, two solar towers with differing storage levels, and a linear Fresnel with direct steam generation. The in-depth performance analysis was based on 4 main criteria and 29 sub-criteria. Quantitative and qualitative data, plus input from 44 stakeholders, were incorporated into the proposed fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model. In addition to demonstrating the advantages and drawbacks of each scenario relative to the local energy sector requirements, the model’s results also provide accurate recommendation guidelines for integrating CSP technology into national grids while respecting stakeholders’ priorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulrahman AlKassem & Kamal Al-Haddad & Dragan Komljenovic & Andrea Schiffauerova, 2025. "The Strategic Selection of Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Technologies in Developing Countries Using a Fuzzy Decision Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:1957-:d:1632667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/8/1957/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/8/1957/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bosetti, Valentina & Catenacci, Michela & Fiorese, Giulia & Verdolini, Elena, 2012. "The future prospect of PV and CSP solar technologies: An expert elicitation survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 308-317.
    2. Cavallaro, Fausto, 2009. "Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1678-1685.
    3. Natalia Kulichenko & Jens Wirth, 2012. "Concentrating Solar Power in Developing Countries : Regulatory and Financial Incentives for Scaling Up," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 9382, August.
    4. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    5. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    6. Ahmad, Salman & Tahar, Razman Mat, 2014. "Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 458-466.
    7. Sylvain Rodat & Richard Thonig, 2024. "Status of Concentrated Solar Power Plants Installed Worldwide: Past and Present Data," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, March.
    8. John J. Burkhardt & Garvin Heath & Elliot Cohen, 2012. "Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Trough and Tower Concentrating Solar Power Electricity Generation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(s1), pages 93-109, April.
    9. Khan, Muhammad Imran & Gutiérrez-Alvarez, R. & Asfand, Faisal & Bicer, Yusuf & Sgouridis, Sgouris & Al-Ghamdi, Sami G. & Jouhara, Hussam & Asif, M. & Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono & Abid, Muhammad & Pesy, 2024. "The economics of concentrating solar power (CSP): Assessing cost competitiveness and deployment potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    10. Peterseim, Juergen H. & White, Stuart & Tadros, Amir & Hellwig, Udo, 2013. "Concentrated solar power hybrid plants, which technologies are best suited for hybridisation?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 520-532.
    11. Peterseim, Juergen H. & White, Stuart & Tadros, Amir & Hellwig, Udo, 2014. "Concentrating solar power hybrid plants – Enabling cost effective synergies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 178-185.
    12. Nixon, J.D. & Dey, P.K. & Davies, P.A., 2010. "Which is the best solar thermal collection technology for electricity generation in north-west India? Evaluation of options using the analytical hierarchy process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5230-5240.
    13. Hernandez, R.R. & Easter, S.B. & Murphy-Mariscal, M.L. & Maestre, F.T. & Tavassoli, M. & Allen, E.B. & Barrows, C.W. & Belnap, J. & Ochoa-Hueso, R. & Ravi, S. & Allen, M.F., 2014. "Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 766-779.
    14. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    15. Zhu, Ke-Jun & Jing, Yu & Chang, Da-Yong, 1999. "A discussion on Extent Analysis Method and applications of fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 450-456, July.
    16. Bale, Catherine S.E. & Varga, Liz & Foxon, Timothy J., 2015. "Energy and complexity: New ways forward," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 150-159.
    17. Ingenhoven, Philip & Lee, Leok & Saw, Woei & Rafique, Muhammad Mujahid & Potter, Daniel & Nathan, Graham J., 2023. "Techno-economic assessment from a transient simulation of a concentrated solar thermal plant to deliver high-temperature industrial process heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Islam, Md Tasbirul & Huda, Nazmul & Abdullah, A.B. & Saidur, R., 2018. "A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies: Current status and research trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 987-1018.
    2. Doljak, Dejan & Stanojević, Gorica, 2017. "Evaluation of natural conditions for site selection of ground-mounted photovoltaic power plants in Serbia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 291-300.
    3. D. Bajić & D. Polomčić & J. Ratković, 2017. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Purposes of Groundwater Control System Design," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(15), pages 4759-4784, December.
    4. Vecihi Yiğit & Nazlı Nisa Demir & Hisham Alidrisi & Mehmet Emin Aydin, 2020. "Elicitation of the Factors Affecting Electricity Distribution Efficiency Using the Fuzzy AHP Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    6. Hussain, C.M. Iftekhar & Norton, Brian & Duffy, Aidan, 2017. "Technological assessment of different solar-biomass systems for hybrid power generation in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1115-1129.
    7. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    8. Wei-Ming Wang & Hsiao-Han Peng, 2020. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework for Urban Sustainable Development," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Gutiérrez, R.E. & Haro, P. & Gómez-Barea, A., 2021. "Techno-economic and operational assessment of concentrated solar power plants with a dual supporting system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    10. Harsha Cheemakurthy & Karl Garme, 2022. "Fuzzy AHP-Based Design Performance Index for Evaluation of Ferries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Svajone Bekesiene & Oleksandr Nakonechnyi & Olena Kapustyan & Rasa Smaliukiene & Ramutė Vaičaitienė & Dalia Bagdžiūnienė & Rosita Kanapeckaitė, 2023. "Determining the Main Resilience Competencies by Applying Fuzzy Logic in Military Organization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Jamal, Taskin & Urmee, Tania & Shafiullah, G.M., 2020. "Planning of off-grid power supply systems in remote areas using multi-criteria decision analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Simsek, Yeliz & Watts, David & Escobar, Rodrigo, 2018. "Sustainability evaluation of Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) projects under Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) by using Multi Criteria Decision Method (MCDM)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 421-438.
    14. Rezaei, Jafar & Ortt, Roland, 2013. "Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 75-84.
    15. Kayakutlu, Gülgün & Büyüközkan, Gülçin, 2008. "Assessing knowledge-based resources in a utility company: Identify and prioritise the balancing factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1027-1037.
    16. Muhammad Mohsin & Yin Hengbin & Zhang Luyao & Li Rui & Qian Chong & Ana Mehak, 2022. "An Application of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Prioritization and Management: A Case Study of the Fisheries Sector in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    17. Bukhary, Saria & Ahmad, Sajjad & Batista, Jacimaria, 2018. "Analyzing land and water requirements for solar deployment in the Southwestern United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3288-3305.
    18. Ahmad, Salman & Nadeem, Abid & Akhanova, Gulzhanat & Houghton, Tom & Muhammad-Sukki, Firdaus, 2017. "Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable and nuclear resources for electricity generation in Kazakhstan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1880-1891.
    19. Heo, Eunnyeong & Kim, Jinsoo & Boo, Kyung-Jin, 2010. "Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(8), pages 2214-2220, October.
    20. Kassem, Abdulrahman & Al-Haddad, Kamal & Komljenovic, Dragan, 2017. "Concentrated solar thermal power in Saudi Arabia: Definition and simulation of alternative scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 75-91.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:1957-:d:1632667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.