IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i7p1808-d1627567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harnessing Horsepower from Horse Manure at the EARTH Centre in South Africa: Biogas Initiative Improve the Facility’s Operational Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Rashama

    (Centre for Competency in Environmental Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of South Africa, Cnr Pioneer and Christian De Wet Roads, Private Bag X6, Florida 1710, South Africa
    Department of Life and Consumer Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Studies, University of South Africa, Cnr Pioneer and Christian De Wet Roads, Private Bag X6, Florida 1710, South Africa)

  • Tonderayi Matambo

    (Centre for Competency in Environmental Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of South Africa, Cnr Pioneer and Christian De Wet Roads, Private Bag X6, Florida 1710, South Africa)

  • Asheal Mutungwazi

    (Infrastructure Services Department: Major Projects, Mount Isa City Council, 23 West Street, Mount Isa, QLD 4825, Australia)

  • Christian Riann

    (Department of Life and Consumer Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Studies, University of South Africa, Cnr Pioneer and Christian De Wet Roads, Private Bag X6, Florida 1710, South Africa)

  • Godwell Nhamo

    (Institute for Corporate Citizenship, College of Economic and Management Sciences, University of South Africa, Preller Street, Muckleneuk, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

Abstract

This study investigated the sustainability aspects of implementing a small-scale biogas digester project at the EARTH Centre, a horse-riding facility for the disabled, in South Africa. Firstly, an energy audit of the facility was conducted. From this exercise, energy-saving opportunities through anaerobic digestion of horse manure were identified. Biomethane potential tests (BMPs) were then performed using the Automatic Methane potential test system II (AMPTS II) of BioProcess Control (Lund, Sweden). The horse manure BMP result was 106 L/kg.VS with the biogas averaging a methane content of 40%. This BMP was lower than that of common substrates such as cow manure which can range from 150–210 L/kg.VS. The gas production rate was almost constant in the first 13 days indicating a long hydrolysis period for horse manure. The microbial species in the digester did not change much during the incubation period although small changes were visible in the proportions of each species as the reaction progressed from start to finish. The energy audit showed that 47% of the EARTH Centre’s energy requirements, which equated to 14,372 kWh/year, could be secured from biogas or solar instead of obtaining it from the national grid which is powered mainly by unsustainable coal-fired systems. As a starting point, a 10 cubic meter biogas digester was installed to produce 5512 kWh of energy per year in the form of biogas. To boost biogas production and continue running the system smoothly, it was evident that the horse manure-fed digester would require regular spiking with cow manure as a bioaugmentation strategy. The digester also produced bio-fertiliser and several sustainable development goals were fulfilled by this project. Current efforts are focused on process optimization of this technology at the Earth Centre to further improve the sustainability of the whole business.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Rashama & Tonderayi Matambo & Asheal Mutungwazi & Christian Riann & Godwell Nhamo, 2025. "Harnessing Horsepower from Horse Manure at the EARTH Centre in South Africa: Biogas Initiative Improve the Facility’s Operational Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1808-:d:1627567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1808/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1808/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taleghani, Giti & Shabani Kia, Akbar, 2005. "Technical–economical analysis of the Saveh biogas power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 441-446.
    2. Mutungwazi, Asheal & Mukumba, Patrick & Makaka, Golden, 2018. "Biogas digester types installed in South Africa: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 172-180.
    3. Andrea Dell’Orto & Cristina Trois, 2024. "Double-Stage Anaerobic Digestion for Biohydrogen Production: A Strategy for Organic Waste Diversion and Emission Reduction in a South African Municipality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Hakawati, Rawan & Smyth, Beatrice M. & McCullough, Geoffrey & De Rosa, Fabio & Rooney, David, 2017. "What is the most energy efficient route for biogas utilization: Heat, electricity or transport?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1076-1087.
    5. Garcia, Natalia Herrero & Mattioli, Andrea & Gil, Aida & Frison, Nicola & Battista, Federico & Bolzonella, David, 2019. "Evaluation of the methane potential of different agricultural and food processing substrates for improved biogas production in rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Theresa Menzel & Peter Neubauer & Stefan Junne, 2020. "Role of Microbial Hydrolysis in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, October.
    7. David R. Kanter, 2018. "Nitrogen pollution: a key building block for addressing climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 11-21, March.
    8. Omamuyovwi Gbejewoh & Saskia Keesstra & Erna Blancquaert, 2021. "The 3Ps (Profit, Planet, and People) of Sustainability amidst Climate Change: A South African Grape and Wine Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Rezazadeh, A. & Kabiri, S., 2020. "A feasibility study on the potential, economic, and environmental advantages of biogas production from poultry manure in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 87-106.
    2. Dejene Tsegaye & Mohammed Mazharuddin Khan & Seyoum Leta, 2023. "Optimization of Operating Parameters for Two-Phase Anaerobic Digestion Treating Slaughterhouse Wastewater for Biogas Production: Focus on Hydrolytic–Acidogenic Phase," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Patrick Mukumba & Shylet Y. Chivanga, 2023. "An Overview of Renewable Energy Technologies in the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa and the Rural Households’ Energy Poverty Coping Strategies," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2014. "Development of biogas combustion in combined heat and power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 868-875.
    6. Sharvini, Siva Raman & Noor, Zainura Zainon & Chong, Chun Shiong & Stringer, Lindsay C & Glew, David, 2020. "Energy generation from palm oil mill effluent: A life cycle assessment of two biogas technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Yermek Abilmazhinov & Kapan Shakerkhan & Vladimir Meshechkin & Yerzhan Shayakhmetov & Nurzhan Nurgaliyev & Anuarbek Suychinov, 2023. "Mathematical Modeling for Evaluating the Sustainability of Biogas Generation through Anaerobic Digestion of Livestock Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Zhilong Wei & Lei Wang & Hu Liu & Zihao Liu & Haisheng Zhen, 2021. "Numerical Investigation on the Flame Structure and CO/NO Formations of the Laminar Premixed Biogas–Hydrogen Impinging Flame in the Wall Vicinity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Gao, Yuchen & Jiang, Jianguo & Meng, Yuan & Aihemaiti, Aikelaimu & Ju, Tongyao & Chen, Xuejing & Yan, Feng, 2020. "A novel nickel catalyst supported on activated coal fly ash for syngas production via biogas dry reforming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 786-793.
    10. Korberg, Andrei David & Skov, Iva Ridjan & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2020. "The role of biogas and biogas-derived fuels in a 100% renewable energy system in Denmark," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Federico Battista & Nicola Frison & David Bolzonella, 2019. "Energy and Nutrients’ Recovery in Anaerobic Digestion of Agricultural Biomass: An Italian Perspective for Future Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Błażej Gaze & Paulina Wojtko & Bernard Knutel & Przemysław Kobel & Kinga Bobrowicz & Przemysław Bukowski & Jerzy Chojnacki & Jan Kielar, 2023. "Influence of Catalytic Additive Application on the Wood-Based Waste Combustion Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    13. Baena-Moreno, Francisco M. & Pastor-Pérez, Laura & Zhang, Zhien & Reina, T.R., 2020. "Stepping towards a low-carbon economy. Formic acid from biogas as case of study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    14. Roozbeh Feiz & Jonas Ammenberg & Annika Björn & Yufang Guo & Magnus Karlsson & Yonghui Liu & Yuxian Liu & Laura Shizue Moriga Masuda & Alex Enrich-Prast & Harald Rohracher & Kristina Trygg & Sepehr Sh, 2019. "Biogas Potential for Improved Sustainability in Guangzhou, China—A Study Focusing on Food Waste on Xiaoguwei Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Tavera-Ruiz, C. & Martí-Herrero, J. & Mendieta, O. & Jaimes-Estévez, J. & Gauthier-Maradei, P. & Azimov, U. & Escalante, H. & Castro, L., 2023. "Current understanding and perspectives on anaerobic digestion in developing countries: Colombia case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Rajesh Banu Jeyakumar & Godvin Sharmila Vincent, 2022. "Recent Advances and Perspectives of Nanotechnology in Anaerobic Digestion: A New Paradigm towards Sludge Biodegradability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Alessandro Casasso & Marta Puleo & Deborah Panepinto & Mariachiara Zanetti, 2021. "Economic Viability and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Budget of the Biomethane Retrofit of Manure-Operated Biogas Plants: A Case Study from Piedmont, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Daniela Szymańska & Aleksandra Lewandowska, 2015. "Biogas Power Plants in Poland—Structure, Capacity, and Spatial Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Georgia-Christina Mitraka & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Maria Batsioula & George F. Banias & Anastasios I. Zouboulis & Panagiotis G. Kougias, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Pretreatment Methods for Enhanced Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-56, September.
    20. Shabarish Shankaran & Tamilarasan Karuppiah & Rajesh Banu Jeyakumar & Godvin Sharmila Vincent, 2023. "Statistical Optimization of Chemo Sonic Liquefaction in Macroalgae for Biohydrogen Generation—An Energy-Effective Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1808-:d:1627567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.