IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i7p1685-d1622098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep Learning vs. Gradient Boosting: Optimizing Transport Energy Forecasts in Thailand Through LSTM and XGBoost

Author

Listed:
  • Thanapong Champahom

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand)

  • Chinnakrit Banyong

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand)

  • Thananya Janhuaton

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand)

  • Chamroeun Se

    (Institute of Research and Development, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand)

  • Fareeda Watcharamaisakul

    (Institute of Research and Development, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand)

  • Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand)

  • Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand)

Abstract

Thailand’s transport sector faces critical challenges in energy management amid rapid economic growth, with transport accounting for approximately 30% of total energy consumption. This study addresses research gaps in transport energy forecasting by comparing Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks and XGBoost models for predicting transport energy consumption in Thailand. Utilizing a comprehensive dataset spanning 1993–2022 that includes vehicle registration data by size category, vehicle kilometers traveled, and macroeconomic indicators, this research evaluates both modeling approaches through multiple performance metrics. The results demonstrate that XGBoost consistently outperforms LSTM, achieving an R-squared value of 0.9508 for test data compared to LSTM’s 0.2005. Feature importance analysis reveals that medium vehicles contribute 36.6% to energy consumption predictions, followed by truck VKT (20.5%), with economic and demographic factors accounting for a combined 15.2%. This research contributes to both methodological understanding and practical application by establishing XGBoost’s superior performance for transport energy forecasting, quantifying the differential impact of various vehicle categories on energy consumption, and demonstrating the value of integrating vehicle registration and usage data in predictive models. The findings provide evidence-based guidance for prioritizing policy interventions in Thailand’s transport sector to enhance energy efficiency and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Thanapong Champahom & Chinnakrit Banyong & Thananya Janhuaton & Chamroeun Se & Fareeda Watcharamaisakul & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao, 2025. "Deep Learning vs. Gradient Boosting: Optimizing Transport Energy Forecasts in Thailand Through LSTM and XGBoost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-30, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1685-:d:1622098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1685/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1685/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1685-:d:1622098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.