IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i14p3604-d1697322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Criteria Analysis in the Selection of Alternative Fuels for Pulse Engines in the Aspect of Environmental Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Grzegorz M. Szymański

    (Institute of Transport, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Bogdan Wyrwas

    (Institute of Technical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Klaudia Strugarek

    (Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Mikołaj Klekowicki

    (Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Malwina Nowak

    (Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Aleksander Ludwiczak

    (Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Alicja Szymańska

    (Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

The growing interest in alternative fuels stems from the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote sustainable development. Despite the dominance of fossil fuels in aviation, pulsejet engines offer a promising platform for testing new fuels due to their simple design and fuel versatility. This study presents a multi-criteria analysis of alternative fuels for use in pulsejet engines, emphasizing environmental impacts. Both gaseous (biogas, ethyne, LPG, and natural gas) and liquid fuels (methanol, ethanol, biodiesel, Jet A-1, and SAF) were examined. Exhaust emissions (CO 2 , H 2 O, CO) were simulated in Ansys 2025 based on literature data and chemical calculations. Additional factors analyzed included calorific value, production cost, thermal expansion, density, life cycle emissions (LCA), CO 2 emissions per fuel mass, and renewable energy content. Using the zero-unitization method, results were normalized into a single aggregate variable for each fuel. The highest values were recorded for biogas and methanol, respectively, indicating their potential as alternative fuels. The findings support further development of sustainable fuels for pulsejet engines. Future research should address combustion optimization and noise reduction, enhancing viability in aviation and other transport sectors. Integration with the current fuel infrastructure is also recommended to facilitate broader implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Grzegorz M. Szymański & Bogdan Wyrwas & Klaudia Strugarek & Mikołaj Klekowicki & Malwina Nowak & Aleksander Ludwiczak & Alicja Szymańska, 2025. "Multi-Criteria Analysis in the Selection of Alternative Fuels for Pulse Engines in the Aspect of Environmental Protection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-31, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3604-:d:1697322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3604/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3604/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergii Boichenko & Oleksandr Bavykin & Artem Artyukhov & Sylwester Bogacki & Marek Rutkowski & Dariusz Reśko, 2025. "Progress and Prospects of Sustainable Aviation Fuel Implementation: A Critical Analysis, Challenges and Conclusions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Prussi, Matteo & Lee, Uisung & Wang, Michael & Malina, Robert & Valin, Hugo & Taheripour, Farzad & Velarde, César & Staples, Mark D. & Lonza, Laura & Hileman, James I., 2021. "CORSIA: The first internationally adopted approach to calculate life-cycle GHG emissions for aviation fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Ming Zhang & Jie Ma & Baogen Su & Guangdong Wen & Qiwei Yang & Qilong Ren, 2017. "Pyrolysis of Polyolefins Using Rotating Arc Plasma Technology for Production of Acetylene," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Chun-Chieh Tseng & Jun-Yi Zeng & Min-Liang Hsieh & Chih-Hung Hsu, 2022. "Analysis of Innovation Drivers of New and Old Kinetic Energy Conversion Using a Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Model in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Chinese Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Delfina Rogowska & Artur Wyrwa, 2021. "Analysis of the Potential for Reducing Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Motor Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Chiu-Chi Wei & Chih-Chien Tai & Shun-Chin Lee & Meng-Ling Chang, 2023. "Assessing Knowledge Quality Using Fuzzy MCDM Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Vishal Ram & Surender Reddy Salkuti, 2023. "An Overview of Major Synthetic Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-35, March.
    8. Pfoser, Sarah & Schauer, Oliver & Costa, Yasel, 2018. "Acceptance of LNG as an alternative fuel: Determinants and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 259-267.
    9. Jorge Martins & F. P. Brito, 2020. "Alternative Fuels for Internal Combustion Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-34, August.
    10. Kari-Anne Lyng & Andreas Brekke, 2019. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Biogas as a Fuel for Transport Compared with Alternative Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramozon Khujamberdiev & Haeng Muk Cho, 2025. "Hybrid Fuels for CI Engines with Biofuel Hydrogen Ammonia and Synthetic Fuel Blends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Bilgili, Levent, 2023. "A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Konstantina Peloriadi & Petros Iliadis & Panagiotis Boutikos & Konstantinos Atsonios & Panagiotis Grammelis & Aristeidis Nikolopoulos, 2022. "Technoeconomic Assessment of LNG-Fueled Solid Oxide Fuel Cells in Small Island Systems: The Patmos Island Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Anas Abuzayed & Michael G Pollitt & Mario Liebensteiner & Simone Hochgreb, 2025. "Exploring the feasibility of low-carbon fuel blends in CCGTs for deep decarbonization of power systems," Working Papers EPRG2520, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    5. Obianuju Patience Ilo & Mulala Danny Simatele & S’phumelele Lucky Nkomo & Ntandoyenkosi Malusi Mkhize & Nagendra Gopinath Prabhu, 2021. "Methodological Approaches to Optimising Anaerobic Digestion of Water Hyacinth for Energy Efficiency in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Kwonwoo Jang & Jeonghyeon Yang & Beomsoo Kim & Jaesung Kwon, 2024. "Effects of Decanol Blended Diesel Fuel on Engine Efficiency and Pollutant Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Seber, Gonca & Escobar, Neus & Valin, Hugo & Malina, Robert, 2022. "Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of sustainable aviation fuels from vegetable oils," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk, 2020. "GHG Emissions and Efficiency of Energy Generation through Anaerobic Fermentation of Wetland Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Paweł Mazuro & Barbara Makarewicz, 2020. "The Potential of Wobble Plate Opposed Piston Axial Engines for Increased Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Giovanni Gaetano Gianetti & Tommaso Lucchini & Gianluca D’Errico & Angelo Onorati & Patrik Soltic, 2023. "Development and Validation of a CFD Combustion Model for Natural Gas Engines Operating with Different Piston Bowls," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Vladimír Hönig & Petr Prochazka & Michal Obergruber & Luboš Smutka & Viera Kučerová, 2019. "Economic and Technological Analysis of Commercial LNG Production in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Jiang, Changmin & Liu, Yan, 2025. "The role of sustainable aviation fuel in CORSIA: An economic analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    13. Ekaterina S. Titova, 2019. "Biofuel Application as a Factor of Sustainable Development Ensuring: The Case of Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    14. Mohd Fadzli Hamid & Yew Heng Teoh & Mohamad Yusof Idroas & Mazlan Mohamed & Shukriwani Sa’ad & Sharzali Che Mat & Muhammad Khalil Abdullah & Thanh Danh Le & Heoy Geok How & Huu Tho Nguyen, 2022. "A Review of the Emulsification Method for Alternative Fuels Used in Diesel Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    15. Angelo C. Gurgel & Joaquim E. A. Seabra & Sofia M. Arantes & Marcelo M. R. Moreira & Lee R. Lynd & Rosana Galindo, 2024. "Contribution of double-cropped maize ethanol in Brazil to sustainable development," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1429-1440, November.
    16. Jufang Zhang & Xiumin Yu & Zezhou Guo & Yinan Li & Jiahua Zhang & Dongjie Liu, 2022. "Study on Combustion and Emissions of a Spark Ignition Engine with Gasoline Port Injection Plus Acetone–Butanol–Ethanol (ABE) Direct Injection under Different Speeds and Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Michels, Marius & Bonke, Vanessa & Wever, Hendrik & Musshoff, Oliver, 2024. "Understanding farmers' intention to buy alternative fuel tractors in German agriculture applying the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. Morenike Ajike Peters & Carine Tondo Alves & Jude Azubuike Onwudili, 2023. "A Review of Current and Emerging Production Technologies for Biomass-Derived Sustainable Aviation Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-40, August.
    19. Hatice Güneş Yıldız & Berk Ayvaz & Ali Osman Kuşakcı & Muhammet Deveci & Harish Garg, 2024. "Sustainability assessment of biomass-based energy supply chain using multi-objective optimization model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 15451-15493, June.
    20. Atienza-Márquez, Antonio & Bruno, Joan Carles & Akisawa, Atsushi & Coronas, Alberto, 2019. "Performance analysis of a combined cold and power (CCP) system with exergy recovery from LNG-regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 448-461.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3604-:d:1697322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.