Author
Listed:
- Yunfei Zhang
(National Key Laboratory of Thorium Energy, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China)
- Guifeng Zhu
(National Key Laboratory of Thorium Energy, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China)
- Yang Zou
(National Key Laboratory of Thorium Energy, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China)
- Jian Guo
(National Key Laboratory of Thorium Energy, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China)
- Bo Zhou
(National Key Laboratory of Thorium Energy, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China)
- Rui Yan
(National Key Laboratory of Thorium Energy, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China)
- Ao Zhang
(National Key Laboratory of Thorium Energy, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China)
Abstract
As a promising nuclear technology, molten salt reactors (MSRs) have a bright future in the energy sector due to their unique advantages such as high efficiency, safety, and fuel flexibility. However, the accurate analysis of fission products in MSRs requires reliable fission yield data. Current reactor burnup analysis often uses the ORIGEN2 code, whose fission yield libraries mainly originate from the outdated 1970s ENDF/B-VI nuclear database, thus risking data obsolescence. This study evaluates ORIGEN2’s fission yield libraries (THERMAL, PWRU, PWRU50) against the modern ENDF/B-VIII.0 library. Through a comprehensive comparative analysis of Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) model, numerical simulations reveal library-dependent differences in MSR burnup characteristics. The PWRU library best matches ENDF/B-VIII.0 for U-235-fueled cases in keff results, while the PWRU50 library has minimal keff deviation in U-233-fueled setups. Moreover, in both fuel cases, the fission yield library was found to significantly affect the activity of key radionuclides, including Kr-85, Kr-85m, I-133m, Cs-136, Sn-123, Sn-125, Sn-127, Sb-124, Sb-125, Cd-115m, Te-125m, Te-129m, etc. Additionally, the fission gas decay heat power calculated via the ORIGEN2 library is over 20% lower than that from the ENDF/B-VIII.0 library tens of days after shutdown, mainly due to differences in long-lived Kr-85 production. These findings highlight the need to update traditional fission yield libraries in burnup codes. For next-generation MSR designs, this is crucial to ensure accurate safety assessments and the effective development of this promising energy technology.
Suggested Citation
Yunfei Zhang & Guifeng Zhu & Yang Zou & Jian Guo & Bo Zhou & Rui Yan & Ao Zhang, 2025.
"A Comparative Study of Fission Yield Libraries Between ORIGEN2 and ENDF/B-VIII.0 for Molten Salt Reactor Burnup Calculation,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-19, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3562-:d:1695890
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3562-:d:1695890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.