IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i8p1868-d1375267.html

Residual Biomass Gasification for Small-Scale Decentralized Electricity Production: Business Models for Lower Societal Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Laurene Desclaux

    (Programa de Planejamento Energético, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-914, Brazil)

  • Amaro Olimpio Pereira

    (Programa de Planejamento Energético, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-914, Brazil)

Abstract

Biomass gasification, a promising sustainable technology for decentralized electricity production, has the potential to displace fossil fuels while valorizing locally produced waste. Previous studies indicate that its technical and financial viabilities vary among projects, and few projects have been successfully developed, despite the sustainability benefits. This study identified and characterized the factors that influence the economic and environmental performances of such projects using a novel, hybrid method, with qualitative analysis using the Business Model Canvas and quantitative life-cycle costs (LCCs) considering the financial and external costs. The financial LCCs and external electricity generation costs were evaluated for business models in agro-industrial factories using proprietary residual biomasses and for those in isolated grids using local agricultural waste. The business models used for biomass gasification projects affect their LCCs and externalities more than factors such as their investment costs and energy efficiencies. The relationship between the business models, the financial performances of the projects, and their impacts on society are highlighted, showing that although projects using proprietary biomass waste have lower financial costs, off-grid projects generate more positive externalities, resulting in lower costs for society. These results indicate that policy support focused on appropriate business models may contribute to optimizing the use of financial incentives to foster investment in new sustainable technologies, contributing to the energy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurene Desclaux & Amaro Olimpio Pereira, 2024. "Residual Biomass Gasification for Small-Scale Decentralized Electricity Production: Business Models for Lower Societal Costs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1868-:d:1375267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1868/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1868/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Field, John L. & Tanger, Paul & Shackley, Simon J. & Haefele, Stephan M., 2016. "Agricultural residue gasification for low-cost, low-carbon decentralized power: An empirical case study in Cambodia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 612-624.
    2. Raman, P. & Ram, N.K., 2013. "Performance analysis of an internal combustion engine operated on producer gas, in comparison with the performance of the natural gas and diesel engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 317-333.
    3. Cleary, Julian & Caspersen, John P., 2015. "Comparing the life cycle impacts of using harvest residue as feedstock for small- and large-scale bioenergy systems (part I)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 917-926.
    4. Naqvi, Muhammad & Yan, Jinyue & Dahlquist, Erik & Naqvi, Salman Raza, 2017. "Off-grid electricity generation using mixed biomass compost: A scenario-based study with sensitivity analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 363-370.
    5. Thomas Pownall & Iain Soutar & Catherine Mitchell, 2021. "Re-Designing GB’s Electricity Market Design: A Conceptual Framework Which Recognises the Value of Distributed Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Mechthild Donner & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "How to innovate business models for a circular bio‐economy?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1932-1947, May.
    7. Steve Evans & Doroteya Vladimirova & Maria Holgado & Kirsten Van Fossen & Miying Yang & Elisabete A. Silva & Claire Y. Barlow, 2017. "Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 597-608, July.
    8. Avilés A., Camilo & Oliva H., Sebastian & Watts, David, 2019. "Single-dwelling and community renewable microgrids: Optimal sizing and energy management for new business models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    9. Giulia Goffetti & Daniel Böckin & Henrikke Baumann & Anne‐Marie Tillman & Thomas Zobel, 2022. "Towards sustainable business models with a novel life cycle assessment method," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2019-2035, July.
    10. Bhoi, Prakashbhai R. & Huhnke, Raymond L. & Kumar, Ajay & Thapa, Sunil & Indrawan, Natarianto, 2018. "Scale-up of a downdraft gasifier system for commercial scale mobile power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 25-33.
    11. Kilinc-Ata, Nurcan & Proskuryakova, Liliana N., 2023. "Empirical analysis of the Russian power industry's transition to sustainability," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Elsner, Witold & Wysocki, Marian & Niegodajew, Paweł & Borecki, Roman, 2017. "Experimental and economic study of small-scale CHP installation equipped with downdraft gasifier and internal combustion engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 213-227.
    13. Roth, Ian F. & Ambs, Lawrence L., 2004. "Incorporating externalities into a full cost approach to electric power generation life-cycle costing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2125-2144.
    14. You, Siming & Tong, Huanhuan & Armin-Hoiland, Joel & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2017. "Techno-economic and greenhouse gas savings assessment of decentralized biomass gasification for electrifying the rural areas of Indonesia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 495-510.
    15. Benedetti, Vittoria & Patuzzi, Francesco & Baratieri, Marco, 2018. "Characterization of char from biomass gasification and its similarities with activated carbon in adsorption applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 92-99.
    16. Natarianto Indrawan & Betty Simkins & Ajay Kumar & Raymond L. Huhnke, 2020. "Economics of Distributed Power Generation via Gasification of Biomass and Municipal Solid Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Aberilla, Jhud Mikhail & Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro & Azapagic, Adisa, 2019. "Environmental sustainability of small-scale biomass power technologies for agricultural communities in developing countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 493-506.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, C.Y. & Deethayat, T. & Wu, J.Y. & Kiatsiriroat, T. & Wang, R.Z., 2018. "Simulation and evaluation of a biomass gasification-based combined cooling, heating, and power system integrated with an organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 238-255.
    2. Natarianto Indrawan & Betty Simkins & Ajay Kumar & Raymond L. Huhnke, 2020. "Economics of Distributed Power Generation via Gasification of Biomass and Municipal Solid Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Barbara Brenner & Daria Drdla, 2023. "Business Model Innovation toward Sustainability and Circularity—A Systematic Review of Innovation Types," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    4. J. R. Copa & C. E. Tuna & J. L. Silveira & R. A. M. Boloy & P. Brito & V. Silva & J. Cardoso & D. Eusébio, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of the Use of Syngas Generated from Biomass to Feed an Internal Combustion Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    5. Angelika Sita Ouedraogo & Robert Scott Frazier & Ajay Kumar, 2021. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Gasification and Landfilling for Disposal of Municipal Solid Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Huchon, Valentin & Pinta, François & Commandré, Jean-Michel & Van De Steene, Laurent, 2020. "How electrical engine power load and feedstock moisture content affect the performance of a fixed bed gasification genset," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Casas-Ledón, Yannay & Flores, Mauricio & Jiménez, Romel & Ronsse, Frederik & Dewulf, Jo & Arteaga-Pérez, Luis E., 2019. "On the environmental and economic issues associated with the forestry residues-to-heat and electricity route in Chile: Sawdust gasification as a case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 763-776.
    8. Elizaveta Averina & Johan Frishammar & Vinit Parida, 2022. "Assessing sustainability opportunities for circular business models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1464-1487, May.
    9. Xueliang Yuan & Leping Chen & Xuerou Sheng & Mengyue Liu & Yue Xu & Yuzhou Tang & Qingsong Wang & Qiao Ma & Jian Zuo, 2021. "Life Cycle Cost of Electricity Production: A Comparative Study of Coal-Fired, Biomass, and Wind Power in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Bhoi, Prakashbhai R. & Huhnke, Raymond L. & Kumar, Ajay & Thapa, Sunil & Indrawan, Natarianto, 2018. "Scale-up of a downdraft gasifier system for commercial scale mobile power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 25-33.
    11. Díaz González, Carlos A. & Pacheco Sandoval, Leonardo, 2020. "Sustainability aspects of biomass gasification systems for small power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    12. Indrawan, Natarianto & Thapa, Sunil & Bhoi, Prakashbhai R. & Huhnke, Raymond L. & Kumar, Ajay, 2018. "Electricity power generation from co-gasification of municipal solid wastes and biomass: Generation and emission performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 764-775.
    13. German Arana‐Landin & Waleska Sigüenza & Beñat Landeta‐Manzano & Iker Laskurain‐Iturbe, 2024. "Circular economy: On the road to ISO 59000 family of standards," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1977-2009, May.
    14. Enevoldsen, Peter & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2016. "Integrating power systems for remote island energy supply: Lessons from Mykines, Faroe Islands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 642-648.
    15. Cinzia Battistella & Maria Rosita Cagnina & Lucia Cicero & Nadia Preghenella, 2018. "Sustainable Business Models of SMEs: Challenges in Yacht Tourism Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Al-Muraisy, Saqr A.A. & Chuayboon, Srirat & Soares, Lais Americo & Buijnsters, J.G. & Ismail, Shahrul bin & Abanades, Stéphane & van Lier, Jules B. & Lindeboom, Ralph E.F., 2025. "Carbon capture through solar-driven CO2 gasification of oil palm empty fruit bunch to produce syngas and biochar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    17. Abbate, Stefano & Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto, 2023. "From Fast to Slow: An Exploratory Analysis of Circular Business Models in the Italian Apparel Industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    18. Federica Murmura & Laura Bravi & Gilberto Santos, 2021. "Sustainable Process and Product Innovation in the Eyewear Sector: The Role of Industry 4.0 Enabling Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Ram, Narasimhan Kodanda & Singh, Nameirakpam Rajesh & Raman, Perumal & Kumar, Atul & Kaushal, Priyanka, 2020. "Experimental study on performance analysis of an internal combustion engine operated on hydrogen-enriched producer gas from the air–steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    20. Ruchi Arora & Meera Kapoor & Nidhi Singh & Muhammad Zafar Yaqub, 2025. "Green cryptocurrency and business strategies: Framework and insights from a stewardship literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 804-829, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1868-:d:1375267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.