IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i22p5696-d1520854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wind–Photovoltaic–Electrolyzer-Underground Hydrogen Storage System for Cost-Effective Seasonal Energy Storage

Author

Listed:
  • Torsten Clemens

    (OMV Energy, Trabrennstraße. 6-8, 1020 Vienna, Austria)

  • Martin Hunyadi-Gall

    (VTU Engineering GmbH, Guglgasse 15/4a/1. OG, 1110 Vienna, Austria)

  • Andreas Lunzer

    (VTU Engineering GmbH, Guglgasse 15/4a/1. OG, 1110 Vienna, Austria)

  • Vladislav Arekhov

    (OMV Energy, Trabrennstraße. 6-8, 1020 Vienna, Austria)

  • Martin Datler

    (OMV Energy, Trabrennstraße. 6-8, 1020 Vienna, Austria)

  • Albert Gauer

    (OMV Energy, Trabrennstraße. 6-8, 1020 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Photovoltaic (PV) and wind energy generation result in low greenhouse gas footprints and can supply electricity to the grid or generate hydrogen for various applications, including seasonal energy storage. Designing integrated wind–PV–electrolyzer underground hydrogen storage (UHS) projects is complex due to the interactions between components. Additionally, the capacities of PV and wind relative to the electrolyzer capacity and fluctuating electricity prices must be considered in the project design. To address these challenges, process modelling was applied using cost components and parameters from a project in Austria. The hydrogen storage part was derived from an Austrian hydrocarbon gas field considered for UHS. The results highlight the impact of the renewable energy source (RES) sizing relative to the electrolyzer capacity, the influence of different wind-to-PV ratios, and the benefits of selling electricity and hydrogen. For the case study, the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) is EUR 6.26/kg for a RES-to-electrolyzer capacity ratio of 0.88. Oversizing reduces the LCOH to 2.61 €/kg when including electricity sales revenues, or EUR 4.40/kg when excluding them. Introducing annually fluctuating electricity prices linked to RES generation results in an optimal RES-to-electrolyzer capacity ratio. The RES-to-electrolyzer capacity can be dynamically adjusted in response to market developments. UHS provides seasonal energy storage in areas with mismatches between RES production and consumption. The main cost components are compression, gas conditioning, wells, and cushion gas. For the Austrian project, the levelized cost of underground hydrogen storage (LCHS) is 0.80 €/kg, with facilities contributing EUR 0.33/kg, wells EUR 0.09/kg, cushion gas EUR 0.23/kg, and OPEX EUR 0.16/kg. Overall, the analysis demonstrates the feasibility of integrated RES–hydrogen generation-seasonal energy storage projects in regions like Austria, with systems that can be dynamically adjusted to market conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Torsten Clemens & Martin Hunyadi-Gall & Andreas Lunzer & Vladislav Arekhov & Martin Datler & Albert Gauer, 2024. "Wind–Photovoltaic–Electrolyzer-Underground Hydrogen Storage System for Cost-Effective Seasonal Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:22:p:5696-:d:1520854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/22/5696/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/22/5696/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcel Clemens & Torsten Clemens, 2022. "Scenarios to Decarbonize Austria’s Energy Consumption and the Role of Underground Hydrogen Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Gianfranco Di Lorenzo & Erika Stracqualursi & Giovanni Vescio & Rodolfo Araneo, 2024. "State of the Art of Renewable Sources Potentialities in the Middle East: A Case Study in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Wagner, Johanna & Bühner, Charlotte & Gölz, Sebastian & Trommsdorff, Max & Jürkenbeck, Kristin, 2024. "Factors influencing the willingness to use agrivoltaics: A quantitative study among German farmers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    4. Qusay Hassan & Imad Saeed Abdulrahman & Hayder M. Salman & Olushola Tomilayo Olapade & Marek Jaszczur, 2023. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Green Hydrogen Production by an Off-Grid Photovoltaic Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Ryan Wiser & Joseph Rand & Joachim Seel & Philipp Beiter & Erin Baker & Eric Lantz & Patrick Gilman, 2021. "Expert elicitation survey predicts 37% to 49% declines in wind energy costs by 2050," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(5), pages 555-565, May.
    6. Rezaei, Mostafa & Akimov, Alexandr & Gray, Evan Mac A., 2024. "Levelised cost of dynamic green hydrogen production: A case study for Australia's hydrogen hubs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    7. Leonhard Povacz & Ramchandra Bhandari, 2023. "Analysis of the Levelized Cost of Renewable Hydrogen in Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rezaei, Mostafa & Akimov, Alexandr & Gray, Evan Mac A., 2024. "Techno-economics of offshore wind-based dynamic hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    2. Torsten Clemens & Andreas Lunzer & Martin Hunyadi-Gall & Pablo Gil, 2025. "Agrivoltaics, Opportunities for Hydrogen Generation, and Market Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Akdağ, Ozan, 2025. "Modeling and economic evaluation of hybrid renewable energy sources for green hydrogen production: A case study for the Mediterranean region," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    4. Renaudineau, Hugues & Vergara-Rosales, Nelson & Llor, Ana M. & Kouro, Samir, 2025. "Green hydrogen production from off-grid photovoltaic: An assessment on optimal sizing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    5. Andrea Dumančić & Nela Vlahinić Lenz & Lahorko Wagmann, 2024. "Profitability Model of Green Hydrogen Production on an Existing Wind Power Plant Location," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Rezaei, Mostafa & Akimov, Alexandr & Gray, Evan MacA., 2024. "Techno-economics of renewable hydrogen export: A case study for Australia-Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    7. Reher, Thomas & Lavaert, Cas & Ottoy, Sam & Martens, Johan A. & Van Orshoven, Jos & Cappelle, Jan & Diels, Jan & Van de Poel, Bram, 2025. "Room for renewables: A GIS-based agrivoltaics site suitability analysis in urbanized landscapes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    8. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Huang, Tao & Yim, Steve Hung Lam, 2024. "Assessment of urban wind energy resource in Hong Kong based on multi-instrument observations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Shields, Matt & Beiter, Philipp & Nunemaker, Jake & Cooperman, Aubryn & Duffy, Patrick, 2021. "Impacts of turbine and plant upsizing on the levelized cost of energy for offshore wind," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    10. Italo Fernandes & Felipe M. Pimenta & Osvaldo R. Saavedra & Arcilan T. Assireu, 2022. "Exploring the Complementarity of Offshore Wind Sites to Reduce the Seasonal Variability of Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Piotr W. Saługa & Krzysztof Zamasz & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz & Katarzyna Szczepańska-Woszczyna & Marcin Malec, 2021. "Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate and Its Components for Onshore Wind Farms at the Feasibility Stage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-12, October.
    12. C, Rösch & E, Fakharizadehshirazi, 2024. "The spatial socio-technical potential of agrivoltaics in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    13. Zhang, Tong & Qadrdan, Meysam & Wu, Jianzhong & Couraud, Benoit & Stringer, Martin & Walker, Sara & Hawkes, Adam & Allahham, Adib & Flynn, David & Pudjianto, Danny & Dodds, Paul & Strbac, Goran, 2025. "A systematic review of modelling methods for studying the integration of hydrogen into energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    14. Pryor, Sara C. & Barthelmie, Rebecca J., 2024. "Wind shadows impact planning of large offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    15. Rajendran, Rajitha & Krishnaswamy, Jayaraman & Subramaniam, Nava & Viswanathan, P.K., 2025. "Renewable R&D investments and carbon emissions in G7 countries: The mediating roles of technology and economic efficiency," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    16. Su, Bo & Guo, Tong & Alam, Md. Mahbub, 2025. "A review of wind energy harvesting technology: Civil engineering resource, theory, optimization, and application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 389(C).
    17. Nguyen, Nhu “Claire” & Johnson, David R., 2024. "The impacts of local wind power objection on the power system of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator area," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    18. Leng, Jun & Li, Gen & Duan, Lei, 2025. "Complex dynamics of downwind floating offshore wind turbines due to tower shadow and platform motions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    19. Arkadiusz Małek & Agnieszka Dudziak & Jacek Caban & Monika Stoma, 2024. "Strategic Model for Yellow Hydrogen Production Using the Metalog Family of Probability Distributions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Piotr Pietrzak & Elżbieta Kacperska & Jakub Kraciuk & Katarzyna Łukasiewicz, 2025. "Publication Trends, Key Findings, and Research Gaps in Renewable Energy Applications in Agriculture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:22:p:5696-:d:1520854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.