IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i7p3276-d1117161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Retrofit of Existing Buildings: Impact Assessment of Residual Fluorocarbons through Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Gianluca Maracchini

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale e Meccanica (DICAM), Università di Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Rocco Di Filippo

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale e Meccanica (DICAM), Università di Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Rossano Albatici

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale e Meccanica (DICAM), Università di Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Oreste S. Bursi

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale e Meccanica (DICAM), Università di Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Rosa Di Maggio

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale e Meccanica (DICAM), Università di Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy)

Abstract

Fluorocarbons are an important category of greenhouse gas emissions, and currently, their use is prohibited due to their significant contribution to the global ozone depletion potential (ODP). During this century, they will continue to emit greenhouse gases into the environment since they are present in the thermal insulation foam and HVAC systems in existing buildings; however, proper disposal of these banks of CFCs/HFCs from existing buildings can limit their effects on the environment. However, there are no studies that have investigated quantifying the achievable environmental savings in this case. In this study, a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) is conducted to evaluate, for the first time in the literature, the environmental savings achievable through the removal and disposal of CFC/HFC banks from buildings including damage-related emissions. To cope with the scarcity of data, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques are applied. The results show that, for the selected archetype building, the largest annual emissions of CFCs/HFCs come from the external thermal insulation of the envelope. The removal of this material can lead to an additional significant reduction in the GWP (up to 569 kgCO 2 eq/m 2 ) and the ODP (up to 117 × 10 −3 kgCFC-11eq/m 2 ), i.e., higher than that achievable by reducing energy consumption through energy retrofit measures (276 and 0, respectively). Thus, CFC/HFC banks should not be neglected in LCA studies of existing buildings due to their possible significant impact on a building’s ecoprofile.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianluca Maracchini & Rocco Di Filippo & Rossano Albatici & Oreste S. Bursi & Rosa Di Maggio, 2023. "Sustainable Retrofit of Existing Buildings: Impact Assessment of Residual Fluorocarbons through Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:3276-:d:1117161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/3276/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/3276/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Panagiotis Chastas & Theodoros Theodosiou & Karolos J. Kontoleon & Dimitrios Bikas, 2017. "The Effect of Embodied Impact on the Cost-Optimal Levels of Nearly Zero Energy Buildings: A Case Study of a Residential Building in Thessaloniki, Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Megan Lickley & Susan Solomon & Sarah Fletcher & Guus J. M. Velders & John Daniel & Matthew Rigby & Stephen A. Montzka & Lambert J. M. Kuijpers & Kane Stone, 2020. "Quantifying contributions of chlorofluorocarbon banks to emissions and impacts on the ozone layer and climate," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Edoardo Baldoni & Silvia Coderoni & Elisa Di Giuseppe & Marco D’Orazio & Roberto Esposti & Gianluca Maracchini, 2021. "A Software Tool for a Stochastic Life Cycle Assessment and Costing of Buildings’ Energy Efficiency Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Asif, M. & Muneer, T., 2007. "Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(7), pages 1388-1413, September.
    5. Francesco Pomponi & Bernardino D’Amico & Alice M. Moncaster, 2017. "A Method to Facilitate Uncertainty Analysis in LCAs of Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Elena G. Dascalaki & Poulia A. Argiropoulou & Constantinos A. Balaras & Kalliopi G. Droutsa & Simon Kontoyiannidis, 2020. "Benchmarks for Embodied and Operational Energy Assessment of Hellenic Single-Family Houses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-36, August.
    7. Elisa Di Giuseppe & Marco D’Orazio & Guangli Du & Claudio Favi & Sébastien Lasvaux & Gianluca Maracchini & Pierryves Padey, 2020. "A Stochastic Approach to LCA of Internal Insulation Solutions for Historic Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-35, February.
    8. Ming Hu, 2020. "A Building Life-Cycle Embodied Performance Index—The Relationship between Embodied Energy, Embodied Carbon and Environmental Impact," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco D’Orazio & Elisa Di Giuseppe & Marta Carosi, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Mortars with Fine Recycled Aggregates from Industrial Waste: Evaluation of Transports Impact in the Italian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Elena G. Dascalaki & Poulia A. Argiropoulou & Constantinos A. Balaras & Kalliopi G. Droutsa & Simon Kontoyiannidis, 2020. "Benchmarks for Embodied and Operational Energy Assessment of Hellenic Single-Family Houses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-36, August.
    3. Svetlana Vladislavlevna Lobova & Aleksei Valentinovich Bogoviz & Yulia Vyacheslavovna Ragulina & Alexander Nikolaevich Alekseev, 2019. "The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia: Analyzing Energy Efficiency Policies at the Federal Level," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 205-211.
    4. Taran Loper & Victoria L. Crittenden, 2017. "Energy Security: Shaping The Consumer Decision Making Process In Emerging Economies," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 8(1).
    5. Hong, Yanran & Cao, Shijiao & Xu, Pengfei & Pan, Zhigang, 2024. "Interpreting the effect of global economic risks on crude oil market: A supply-demand perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas & Altmann, Jörn, 2014. "A Review of Renewable Energy Supply and Energy Efficiency Technologies," IZA Discussion Papers 8145, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Yuan, Mei-Hua & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2020. "Developing indicators for the monitoring of the sustainability of food, energy, and water," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Aleksei Valentinovich Bogoviz & Svetlana Vladislavlevna Lobova & Yulia Vyacheslavovna Ragulina & Alexander Nikolaevich Alekseev, 2018. "Russia s Energy Security Doctrine: Addressing Emerging Challenges and Opportunities," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 1-6.
    9. Huang, Beijia & Zhang, Long & Ma, Linmao & Bai, Wuliyasu & Ren, Jingzheng, 2021. "Multi-criteria decision analysis of China’s energy security from 2008 to 2017 based on Fuzzy BWM-DEA-AR model and Malmquist Productivity Index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Edoardo Baldoni & Silvia Coderoni & Elisa Di Giuseppe & Marco D’Orazio & Roberto Esposti & Gianluca Maracchini, 2021. "A Software Tool for a Stochastic Life Cycle Assessment and Costing of Buildings’ Energy Efficiency Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    11. Alrubaih, M.S. & Zain, M.F.M. & Alghoul, M.A. & Ibrahim, N.L.N. & Shameri, M.A. & Elayeb, Omkalthum, 2013. "Research and development on aspects of daylighting fundamentals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 494-505.
    12. Fekadu, Geleta & Subudhi, Sudhakar, 2018. "Renewable energy for liquid desiccants air conditioning system: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 364-379.
    13. Mohsin, Muhammad & Jamaani, Fouad, 2023. "Green finance and the socio-politico-economic factors’ impact on the future oil prices: Evidence from machine learning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    14. Tariq Muneer & Rory Dowell, 2022. "Potential for renewable energy–assisted harvesting of potatoes in Scotland [Energy supply, its demands and security issues for developed and emerging economies]," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 17, pages 469-481.
    15. Fahad Bin Abdullah & Rizwan Iqbal & Falak Shad Memon & Sadique Ahmad & Mohammed A. El-Affendi, 2023. "Advancing Sustainability in the Power Distribution Industry: An Integrated Framework Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-28, May.
    16. Ramos, Greici & Ghisi, Enedir, 2010. "Analysis of daylight calculated using the EnergyPlus programme," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 1948-1958, September.
    17. Shao, Yanmin & Qiao, Han & Wang, Shouyang, 2017. "What determines China's crude oil importing trade patterns? Empirical evidences from 55 countries between 1992 and 2015," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 854-862.
    18. Defne, Zafer & Haas, Kevin A. & Fritz, Hermann M. & Jiang, Lide & French, Steven P. & Shi, Xuan & Smith, Brennan T. & Neary, Vincent S. & Stewart, Kevin M., 2012. "National geodatabase of tidal stream power resource in USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3326-3338.
    19. García Kerdan, Iván & Morillón Gálvez, David & Raslan, Rokia & Ruyssevelt, Paul, 2015. "Modelling the energy and exergy utilisation of the Mexican non-domestic sector: A study by climatic regions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 191-206.
    20. Hokey Min & Yohannes Haile, 2021. "Examining the Role of Disruptive Innovation in Renewable Energy Businesses from a Cross National Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:3276-:d:1117161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.