IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i23p7775-d1287805.html

Optimizing Generation Maintenance Scheduling Considering Emission Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Panit Prukpanit

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Thammasat University, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand)

  • Phisan Kaewprapha

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Thammasat University, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand)

  • Nopbhorn Leeprechanon

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Thammasat University, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand)

Abstract

Conventional generation maintenance scheduling (GMS) is a solution to increase the reliability of power systems and minimize the operation and maintenance costs paid by generation companies (GenCos). Nonetheless, environmental aspects, such as zero carbon emissions, have attracted global attention, leading to emission costs being paid by electricity generators. Therefore, to obtain GMS plans that consider these factors, this paper proposes multi-objective GMS models to minimize operation, maintenance, and emission costs by using lexicographic optimization as a mathematical tool. A demand response program (DRP) is also adapted to decrease emission generation and operational expenditures. The probability that no generation unit (GU) fails unexpectedly and the average net reserve value, comprising the system reliability with and without considering the GU failure rate, are demonstrated. Numerical examples are implemented for the IEEE 24-bus reliability test system. A GMS algorithm presented in a published work is run and compared to verify the robustness of the proposed GMS models. Our results indicate that this paper provides comprehensive approaches to the multi-objective GMS problem focusing on operation, maintenance, carbon, and DRP costs in consideration of technical and environmental aspects. The use of lexicographic optimization allows for the systematic and hierarchical consideration of these objectives, leading to significant benefits for GenCos.

Suggested Citation

  • Panit Prukpanit & Phisan Kaewprapha & Nopbhorn Leeprechanon, 2023. "Optimizing Generation Maintenance Scheduling Considering Emission Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:23:p:7775-:d:1287805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7775/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7775/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lovcha, Yuliya & Perez-Laborda, Alejandro & Sikora, Iryna, 2022. "The determinants of CO2 prices in the EU emission trading system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    2. Hemmati, Reza & Saboori, Hedayat & Jirdehi, Mehdi Ahmadi, 2016. "Multistage generation expansion planning incorporating large scale energy storage systems and environmental pollution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 636-645.
    3. Leroutier, Marion, 2022. "Carbon pricing and power sector decarbonization: Evidence from the UK," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Rokhforoz, Pegah & Montazeri, Mina & Fink, Olga, 2023. "Safe multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for joint bidding and maintenance scheduling of generation units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jingbo & Wen, Jianfeng & Long, Chao & Yang, Bo & Jiang, Lin, 2026. "Global electricity-carbon market nexus: A systematic review of synergistic efforts towards a net-zero power sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 402(PB).
    2. Filippos Ioannidis & Kyriaki Kosmidou & Panayiotis Theodossiou, 2025. "Spillovers Into the German Electricity Market From the Gas, Coal, and CO2 Emissions Markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(9), pages 1253-1277, September.
    3. Missbach, Leonard & Steckel, Jan Christoph & Vogt-Schilb, Adrien, 2024. "Cash transfers in the context of carbon pricing reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Yu, Peipei & Zhang, Hongcai & Song, Yonghua & Wang, Zhenyi & Dong, Huiyu & Ji, Liang, 2025. "Safe reinforcement learning for power system control: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    5. Osorio, Sebastian & Pietzcker, Robert C. & Pahle, Michael & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2020. "How to deal with the risks of phasing out coal in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Vrionis, Constantinos & Tsalavoutis, Vasilios & Tolis, Athanasios, 2020. "A Generation Expansion Planning model for integrating high shares of renewable energy: A Meta-Model Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. aus dem Moore, Nils & Brehm, Johannes & Gruhl, Henri, 2025. "Driving innovation? Carbon tax effects in the Swedish transport sector," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    8. Tabak, Benjamin M. & Fulber, Ives Cezar & Froner, Matheus B., 2025. "The nexus between carbon, energy and agrifood—A contemporaneous and lagged spillover analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Capper, Timothy & Kuriakose, Jaise & Sharmina, Maria, 2024. "Facilitating domestic demand response in Britain’s electricity system," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Isaak Mengesha & Debraj Roy, 2025. "Carbon pricing drives critical transition to green growth," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Constantino Dário Justo & José Eduardo Tafula & Pedro Moura, 2022. "Planning Sustainable Energy Systems in the Southern African Development Community: A Review of Power Systems Planning Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    12. Wanlin Yu & Jinlong Luo, 2022. "Impact on Carbon Intensity of Carbon Emission Trading—Evidence from a Pilot Program in 281 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Zhang, Dingyang & Zhang, Yiming & Li, Pei & Zhang, Shuyou, 2025. "Kernel Reinforcement Learning for sampling-efficient risk management of large-scale engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    14. Rodgers, Mark & Coit, David & Felder, Frank & Carlton, Annmarie, 2019. "Assessing the effects of power grid expansion on human health externalities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 92-104.
    15. Cristiano Salvagnin & Aldo Glielmo & Maria Elena De Giuli & Antonietta Mira, 2024. "Investigating the price determinants of the European Emission Trading System: a non-parametric approach," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1529-1544, October.
    16. Lin, Xiajing & Huang, Guohe & Zhou, Xiong & Zhai, Yuanyuan, 2023. "An inexact fractional multi-stage programming (IFMSP) method for planning renewable electric power system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    17. Mehrjerdi, Hasan & Bornapour, Mosayeb & Hemmati, Reza & Ghiasi, Seyyed Mohammad Sadegh, 2019. "Unified energy management and load control in building equipped with wind-solar-battery incorporating electric and hydrogen vehicles under both connected to the grid and islanding modes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 919-930.
    18. Abrell, Jan & Kosch, Mirjam & Rausch, Sebastian, 2022. "How effective is carbon pricing?—A machine learning approach to policy evaluation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    19. Zhu, Yunxin & Zheng, Meimei & Su, Zhiyun & Xia, Tangbin & Lin, Jie & Pan, Ershun, 2025. "Deep reinforcement learning for joint optimization of maintenance and spare parts ordering considering spare parts supply uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
    20. Su, Chi Wei & Wei, Shenkai & Wang, Yan & Tao, Ran, 2024. "How does climate policy uncertainty affect the carbon market?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:23:p:7775-:d:1287805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.