IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i19p6904-d1251809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Steel, Aluminum, and FRP-Composites: The Race to Zero Carbon Emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Vaishnavi Vijay Rajulwar

    (Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • Tetiana Shyrokykh

    (Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • Robert Stirling

    (Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • Tova Jarnerud

    (Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
    Swedish Research Institute for Mining, Metallurgy and Materials, Process Metallurgy, SE-974 37 Luleå, Sweden)

  • Yuri Korobeinikov

    (Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • Sudip Bose

    (Tata Steel Ltd., Chowringhee 700071, West Bengal, India)

  • Basudev Bhattacharya

    (Tata Steel Ltd., Jamshedpur 831001, Jharkhand, India)

  • Debashish Bhattacharjee

    (Tata Steel Ltd., Chowringhee 700071, West Bengal, India)

  • Seetharaman Sridhar

    (Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

Abstract

As various regions around the world implement carbon taxes, we assert that the competitiveness of steel products in the marketplace will shift according to individual manufacturers’ ability to reduce CO 2 emissions as measured by cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Analysis (LCA). This study was performed by using LCA and cost estimate research to compare the CO 2 emissions and the additional cost applied to the production of various decarbonized materials used in sheet for automotive industry applications using the bending stiffness-based weight reduction factor. The pre-pandemic year 2019 was used as a baseline for cost estimates. This paper discusses the future cost scenarios based on carbon taxes and hydrogen cost. The pathways to decarbonize steel and alternative materials such as aluminum and reinforced polymer composites were evaluated. Normalized global warming potential (nGWP) estimates were calculated assuming inputs from the current USA electricity grid, and a hypothetical renewables-based grid. For a current electricity grid mix in the US (with 61% fossil fuels, 19% nuclear, 20% renewables), the lowest nGWP was found to be secondary aluminum and 100% recycled scrap melting of steel. This is followed by the natural gas Direct Reduced Iron–Electric Arc Furnace (DRI-EAF) route with carbon capture and the Blast Furnace-Basic Oxygen Furnace (BF-BOF) route with carbon capture. From the cost point of view, the current cheapest decarbonized production route is natural gas DRI-EAF with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). For a renewable electricity grid (50% solar photovoltaic and 50% wind), the lowest GWP was found to be 100% recycled scrap melting of steel and secondary aluminum. This is followed by the hydrogen-based DRI-EAF route and natural gas DRI-EAF with carbon capture. The results indicate that, when applying technologies available today, decarbonized steel will remain competitive, at least in the context of automotive sheet selection compared to aluminum and composites.

Suggested Citation

  • Vaishnavi Vijay Rajulwar & Tetiana Shyrokykh & Robert Stirling & Tova Jarnerud & Yuri Korobeinikov & Sudip Bose & Basudev Bhattacharya & Debashish Bhattacharjee & Seetharaman Sridhar, 2023. "Steel, Aluminum, and FRP-Composites: The Race to Zero Carbon Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-30, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:19:p:6904-:d:1251809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/19/6904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/19/6904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirschen, Marcus & Badr, Karim & Pfeifer, Herbert, 2011. "Influence of direct reduced iron on the energy balance of the electric arc furnace in steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 6146-6155.
    2. Mazin Obaidat & Ahmed Al-Ghandoor & Patrick Phelan & Rene Villalobos & Ammar Alkhalidi, 2018. "Energy and Exergy Analyses of Different Aluminum Reduction Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Jana Gerta Backes & Julian Suer & Nils Pauliks & Sabrina Neugebauer & Marzia Traverso, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of an Integrated Steel Mill Using Primary Manufacturing Data: Actual Environmental Profile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julian Suer & Marzia Traverso & Nils Jäger, 2022. "Review of Life Cycle Assessments for Steel and Environmental Analysis of Future Steel Production Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Sgouridis, Sgouris & Ali, Mohamed & Sleptchenko, Andrei & Bouabid, Ali & Ospina, Gustavo, 2021. "Aluminum smelters in the energy transition: Optimal configuration and operation for renewable energy integration in high insolation regions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 937-953.
    3. Raul Garcia-Segura & Javier Vázquez Castillo & Fernando Martell-Chavez & Omar Longoria-Gandara & Jaime Ortegón Aguilar, 2017. "Electric Arc Furnace Modeling with Artificial Neural Networks and Arc Length with Variable Voltage Gradient," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-11, September.
    4. Bożena Gajdzik & Radosław Wolniak & Wies Grebski, 2023. "Process of Transformation to Net Zero Steelmaking: Decarbonisation Scenarios Based on the Analysis of the Polish Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-36, April.
    5. Manojlović, Vaso & Kamberović, Željko & Korać, Marija & Dotlić, Milan, 2022. "Machine learning analysis of electric arc furnace process for the evaluation of energy efficiency parameters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    6. Chepeliev, Maksym & Aguiar, Angel & Farole, Thomas & Liverani, Andrea & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2022. "EU Green Deal and Circular Economy Transition: Impacts and Interactions," Conference papers 333431, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Sinha, Rakesh Kumar & Chaturvedi, Nitin Dutt, 2019. "A review on carbon emission reduction in industries and planning emission limits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Sheinbaum-Pardo, Claudia, 2016. "Decomposition analysis from demand services to material production: The case of CO2 emissions from steel produced for automobiles in Mexico," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 245-255.
    9. Alla Toktarova & Ida Karlsson & Johan Rootzén & Lisa Göransson & Mikael Odenberger & Filip Johnsson, 2020. "Pathways for Low-Carbon Transition of the Steel Industry—A Swedish Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Sébastien Pissot & Henrik Thunman & Peter Samuelsson & Martin Seemann, 2021. "Production of Negative-Emissions Steel Using a Reducing Gas Derived from DFB Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    11. Qiu, Ziyang & Du, Tao & Yue, Qiang & Na, Hongming & Sun, Jingchao & Yuan, Yuxing & Che, Zichang & Wang, Yisong & Li, Yingnan, 2023. "A multi-parameters evaluation on exergy for hydrogen metallurgy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    12. Kovačič, Miha & Šarler, Božidar, 2014. "Genetic programming prediction of the natural gas consumption in a steel plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 273-284.
    13. Jie Yang & Shaowen Lu & Liangyong Wang, 2020. "Fused magnesia manufacturing process: a survey," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 327-350, February.
    14. Samet, Haidar & Ghanbari, Teymoor & Ghaisari, Jafar, 2014. "Maximizing the transferred power to electric arc furnace for having maximum production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 752-759.
    15. Chen, Zhengjie & Ma, Wenhui & Wu, Jijun & Wei, Kuixian & Yang, Xi & Lv, Guoqiang & Xie, Keqiang & Yu, Jie, 2016. "Influence of carbothermic reduction on submerged arc furnace energy efficiency during silicon production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 687-693.
    16. Haendel, Michael & Hirzel, Simon & Süß, Marlene, 2022. "Economic optima for buffers in direct reduction steelmaking under increasing shares of renewable hydrogen," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1100-1111.
    17. Qiu, Ziyang & Yue, Qiang & Yan, Tianyi & Wang, Qi & Sun, Jingchao & Yuan, Yuxing & Che, Zichang & Wang, Yisong & Du, Tao, 2023. "Gas utilization optimization and exergy analysis of hydrogen metallurgical shaft furnace," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    18. Natalia V. Starodubets & Irina S. Belik & Natalia L. Nikulina & Tamila T. Alikberova, 2023. "Assessment and Forecasting of Metallurgical Enterprises Carbon Footprint in the Sverdlovsk Region," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 22(3), pages 572-599.
    19. Davide Rovelli & Carlo Brondi & Michele Andreotti & Elisabetta Abbate & Maurizio Zanforlin & Andrea Ballarino, 2022. "A Modular Tool to Support Data Management for LCA in Industry: Methodology, Application and Potentialities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-31, March.
    20. Gajic, Dragoljub & Savic-Gajic, Ivana & Savic, Ivan & Georgieva, Olga & Di Gennaro, Stefano, 2016. "Modelling of electrical energy consumption in an electric arc furnace using artificial neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 132-139.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:19:p:6904-:d:1251809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.