IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2022i1p330-d1017625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investment Risk and Energy Security Assessment of European Union Countries Using Multicriteria Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Justyna Kozłowska

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Marco Antônio Benvenga

    (Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University—UNIP, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)

  • Irenilza de Alencar Nääs

    (Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University—UNIP, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)

Abstract

Investment opportunities are analyzed from the perspective of the variables that influence risk. The present study analyzes some energy characteristics using data from the Eurostat Data Browser. First, we identified a gap in energy research. Second, we proposed a multicriteria analysis using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). An algorithm was developed to simulate how experts think to determine pairwise comparisons. A procedure identified the levels of importance of each criterion and alternative based on extracted data from the Eurostat website. The method was used to rate countries according to data regarding their energy policy results. The present study shows that applying the AHP method is possible without expert support and using data regarding the theme studied. The results show that Malta and Estonia are the most suitable countries to receive investments since they are presently at the top of the energy security ranking. The selected set of criteria seems to properly correspond with the assessment of the sector security as far as risk investment is concerned. The results of the current study may represent a base to support investment decision-making in the energy sector of EU countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Justyna Kozłowska & Marco Antônio Benvenga & Irenilza de Alencar Nääs, 2022. "Investment Risk and Energy Security Assessment of European Union Countries Using Multicriteria Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:330-:d:1017625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/330/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/330/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melo, F.M. & Magnani, F.S. & Carvalho, M., 2022. "A decision-making method to choose optimal systems considering financial and environmental aspects: Application in hybrid CCHP systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    2. Min-Sung Kim & Eul-Bum Lee & In-Hye Jung & Douglas Alleman, 2018. "Risk Assessment and Mitigation Model for Overseas Steel-Plant Project Investment with Analytic Hierarchy Process—Fuzzy Inference System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Vincenzo Del Giudice & Pierfrancesco De Paola & Torrieri Francesca & Peter J. Nijkamp & Aviad Shapira, 2019. "Real Estate Investment Choices and Decision Support Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Garbuzova-Schlifter, Maria & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "AHP-based risk analysis of energy performance contracting projects in Russia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 559-581.
    5. A. Dinmohammadi & M. Shafiee, 2017. "Determination of the Most Suitable Technology Transfer Strategy for Wind Turbines Using an Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Decision Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Nguyen Van Thanh & Nguyen Thi Kim Lan, 2022. "Solar Energy Deployment for the Sustainable Future of Vietnam: Hybrid SWOC-FAHP-WASPAS Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-11, April.
    7. Mohammed Alghassab, 2021. "Analyzing the Impact of Cybersecurity on Monitoring and Control Systems in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Tomasz Jałowiec & Henryk Wojtaszek & Ireneusz Miciuła, 2021. "Green Energy Management through the Implementation of RES in the EU. Analysis of the Opinions of Poland and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-33, December.
    9. Maltby, Tomas, 2013. "European Union energy policy integration: A case of European Commission policy entrepreneurship and increasing supranationalism," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 435-444.
    10. Jui-Sheng Chou & Pin-Chao Liao & Chung-Da Yeh, 2021. "Risk Analysis and Management of Construction and Operations in Offshore Wind Power Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Hai-Min Lyu & Yong-Xia Wu & Jack Shuilong Shen & An-Nan Zhou, 2018. "Assessment of Social-Economic Risk of Chinese Dual Land Use System Using Fuzzy AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    12. BumChoong Kim & Juhan Kim & Jinsoo Kim, 2019. "Evaluation Model for Investment in Solar Photovoltaic Power Generation Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Cayir Ervural, Beyzanur & Evren, Ramazan & Delen, Dursun, 2018. "A multi-objective decision-making approach for sustainable energy investment planning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 387-402.
    14. Pohekar, S. D. & Ramachandran, M., 2004. "Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 365-381, August.
    15. Katalenich, Scott M. & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2022. "Toward battery electric and hydrogen fuel cell military vehicles for land, air, and sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karunathilake, Hirushie & Hewage, Kasun & Prabatha, Tharindu & Ruparathna, Rajeev & Sadiq, Rehan, 2020. "Project deployment strategies for community renewable energy: A dynamic multi-period planning approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 237-258.
    2. Yevang Nhiavue & Han Soo Lee & Sylvester William Chisale & Jonathan Salar Cabrera, 2022. "Prioritization of Renewable Energy for Sustainable Electricity Generation and an Assessment of Floating Photovoltaic Potential in Lao PDR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Adriano Bisello, 2020. "Assessing Multiple Benefits of Housing Regeneration and Smart City Development: The European Project SINFONIA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Rubio Rodríguez, M.A. & Ruyck, J. De & Díaz, P. Roque & Verma, V.K. & Bram, S., 2011. "An LCA based indicator for evaluation of alternative energy routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 630-635, March.
    5. Haurant, P. & Oberti, P. & Muselli, M., 2011. "Multicriteria selection aiding related to photovoltaic plants on farming fields on Corsica island: A real case study using the ELECTRE outranking framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 676-688, February.
    6. Figge, Frank & Hahn, Tobias & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "The If, How and Where of assessing sustainable resource use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 274-283.
    7. Tan, R.R. & Aviso, K.B. & Ng, D.K.S., 2019. "Optimization models for financing innovations in green energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Chopin, Pierre & Guindé, Loïc & Causeret, François & Bergkvist, Göran & Blazy, Jean-Marc, 2019. "Integrating stakeholder preferences into assessment of scenarios for electricity production from locally produced biomass on a small island," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 128-136.
    9. Frank, Alejandro Germán & Gerstlberger, Wolfgang & Paslauski, Carolline Amaral & Lerman, Laura Visintainer & Ayala, Néstor Fabián, 2018. "The contribution of innovation policy criteria to the development of local renewable energy systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 353-365.
    10. Alyami, Saleh. H. & Rezgui, Yacine & Kwan, Alan, 2013. "Developing sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 43-54.
    11. Hajkowicz, Stefan & Higgins, Andrew, 2008. "A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 255-265, January.
    12. Mukisa, Nicholas & Zamora, Ramon & Lie, Tek Tjing, 2020. "Assessment of community sustainable livelihoods capitals for the implementation of alternative energy technologies in Uganda – Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 886-902.
    13. Ren, Hongbo & Gao, Weijun & Zhou, Weisheng & Nakagami, Ken'ichi, 2009. "Multi-criteria evaluation for the optimal adoption of distributed residential energy systems in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5484-5493, December.
    14. Villacreses, Geovanna & Gaona, Gabriel & Martínez-Gómez, Javier & Jijón, Diego Juan, 2017. "Wind farms suitability location using geographical information system (GIS), based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods: The case of continental Ecuador," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 275-286.
    15. Sobczyk, Eugeniusz J. & Kicki, Jerzy & Sobczyk, Wiktoria & Szuwarzyński, Marek, 2017. "Support of mining investment choice decisions with the use of multi-criteria method," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 94-99.
    16. Henao, Felipe & Cherni, Judith A. & Jaramillo, Patricia & Dyner, Isaac, 2012. "A multicriteria approach to sustainable energy supply for the rural poor," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 801-809.
    17. Haji Vahabzadeh, Ali & Asiaei, Arash & Zailani, Suhaiza, 2015. "Reprint of “Green decision-making model in reverse logistics using FUZZY-VIKOR method”," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 334-347.
    18. Manley, Dawn K. & Hines, Valerie A. & Jordan, Matthew W. & Stoltz, Ronald E., 2013. "A survey of energy policy priorities in the United States: Energy supply security, economics, and the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 687-696.
    19. Venmans, Frank, 2012. "A literature-based multi-criteria evaluation of the EU ETS," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5493-5510.
    20. Dianfa Wu & Zhiping Yang & Ningling Wang & Chengzhou Li & Yongping Yang, 2018. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model and AHP Weighting Uncertainty Analysis for Sustainability Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:330-:d:1017625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.