IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i15p5468-d874158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operating Renewable Energy Communities to Reduce Power Peaks in the Distribution Grid: An Analysis on Grid-Friendliness, Different Shares of Participants, and Economic Benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Robin Sudhoff

    (Siemens AG, Technology, Günther-Scharowsky-Str. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Landgraf-Georg-Str. 4, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Sebastian Schreck

    (Siemens AG, Technology, Günther-Scharowsky-Str. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Landgraf-Georg-Str. 4, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Sebastian Thiem

    (Siemens AG, Technology, Günther-Scharowsky-Str. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Stefan Niessen

    (Siemens AG, Technology, Günther-Scharowsky-Str. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Landgraf-Georg-Str. 4, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany)

Abstract

Improving the control of flexible assets in distribution grids, e.g., battery storages, electric vehicle charging points, and heat pumps, can balance power peaks caused by high renewable power generation or load to prevent overloading the grid infrastructure. Renewable energy communities, introduced as part of the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive, provide a regulatory framework for this. As a multi-site energy management method, they can tap flexibility potential. The present work quantifies stimulus for renewable energy communities to incentivize the grid-friendly operation of flexible assets, depending on the shares of participants in rural, suburban, and urban grid topologies. Results indicate that an operation of the community, driven by maximizing the economic benefits of its members, does not clearly reduce the annual peak load at the low-voltage substation, while the operation strategy of a grid-friendly renewable energy community achieves a peak power reduction of 23–55%. When there is not full participation, forecasts of the residual load of non-participants provided by the distribution system operator can be considered in the optimization of the renewable energy community. For all simulation cases, the economic benefit between the two operation strategies differs by less than one percent, resulting in a very low additional incentive required for grid-friendliness in terms of reduced peak power. Thus, grid-friendly renewable energy communities might be a cost-effective way to defer future grid reinforcements.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin Sudhoff & Sebastian Schreck & Sebastian Thiem & Stefan Niessen, 2022. "Operating Renewable Energy Communities to Reduce Power Peaks in the Distribution Grid: An Analysis on Grid-Friendliness, Different Shares of Participants, and Economic Benefits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5468-:d:874158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5468/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5468/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weckesser, Tilman & Dominković, Dominik Franjo & Blomgren, Emma M.V. & Schledorn, Amos & Madsen, Henrik, 2021. "Renewable Energy Communities: Optimal sizing and distribution grid impact of photo-voltaics and battery storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    2. Yael Parag & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2016. "Electricity market design for the prosumer era," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(4), pages 1-6, April.
    3. Steffen Meinecke & Džanan Sarajlić & Simon Ruben Drauz & Annika Klettke & Lars-Peter Lauven & Christian Rehtanz & Albert Moser & Martin Braun, 2020. "SimBench—A Benchmark Dataset of Electric Power Systems to Compare Innovative Solutions Based on Power Flow Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Di Lorenzo, Gianfranco & Rotondo, Sara & Araneo, Rodolfo & Petrone, Giovanni & Martirano, Luigi, 2021. "Innovative power-sharing model for buildings and energy communities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1087-1102.
    5. Bernd Thormann & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Evaluation of Grid Capacities for Integrating Future E-Mobility and Heat Pumps into Low-Voltage Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-30, September.
    6. Nan, Sibo & Zhou, Ming & Li, Gengyin, 2018. "Optimal residential community demand response scheduling in smart grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1280-1289.
    7. Stinner, Sebastian & Huchtemann, Kristian & Müller, Dirk, 2016. "Quantifying the operational flexibility of building energy systems with thermal energy storages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 140-154.
    8. Gonzalez Venegas, Felipe & Petit, Marc & Perez, Yannick, 2021. "Active integration of electric vehicles into distribution grids: Barriers and frameworks for flexibility services," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Johannes Radl & Andreas Fleischhacker & Frida Huglen Revheim & Georg Lettner & Hans Auer, 2020. "Comparison of Profitability of PV Electricity Sharing in Renewable Energy Communities in Selected European Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Luca Mendicino & Daniele Menniti & Anna Pinnarelli & Nicola Sorrentino & Pasquale Vizza & Claudio Alberti & Francesco Dura, 2021. "DSO Flexibility Market Framework for Renewable Energy Community of Nanogrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Berg, Kjersti & Rana, Rubi & Farahmand, Hossein, 2023. "Quantifying the benefits of shared battery in a DSO-energy community cooperation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    2. Giovanni Gino Zanvettor & Marco Casini & Antonio Giannitrapani & Simone Paoletti & Antonio Vicino, 2022. "Optimal Management of Energy Communities Hosting a Fleet of Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Ludwik Wicki & Robert Pietrzykowski & Dariusz Kusz, 2022. "Factors Determining the Development of Prosumer Photovoltaic Installations in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Alexander Micallef & Cyril Spiteri Staines & John Licari, 2022. "Renewable Energy Communities in Islands: A Maltese Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Schreck & Robin Sudhoff & Sebastian Thiem & Stefan Niessen, 2022. "On the Importance of Grid Tariff Designs in Local Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Neska, Ewa & Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna, 2022. "Conceptual design of energy market topologies for communities and their practical applications in EU: A comparison of three case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Andreolli, Francesca & D'Alpaos, Chiara & Kort, Peter, 2023. "Does P2P Trading Favor Investments in PV-Battery Systems?," FEEM Working Papers 330498, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    4. Nizami, Sohrab & Tushar, Wayes & Hossain, M.J. & Yuen, Chau & Saha, Tapan & Poor, H. Vincent, 2022. "Transactive energy for low voltage residential networks: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    5. Francesca Andreolli & Chiara D'Alpaos & Peter Kort, 2023. "Does P2P Trading Favor Investments in PV-Battery Systems?," Working Papers 2023.02, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    6. Ricardo Faia & Pedro Faria & Zita Vale & João Spinola, 2019. "Demand Response Optimization Using Particle Swarm Algorithm Considering Optimum Battery Energy Storage Schedule in a Residential House," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Felice, Alex & Rakocevic, Lucija & Peeters, Leen & Messagie, Maarten & Coosemans, Thierry & Ramirez Camargo, Luis, 2022. "Renewable energy communities: Do they have a business case in Flanders?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    8. Christian Pfeiffer & Markus Puchegger & Claudia Maier & Ina V. Tomaschitz & Thomas P. Kremsner & Lukas Gnam, 2020. "A Case Study of Socially-Accepted Potentials for the Use of End User Flexibility by Home Energy Management Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Simoiu, Mircea Stefan & Fagarasan, Ioana & Ploix, Stéphane & Calofir, Vasile, 2022. "Modeling the energy community members’ willingness to change their behaviour with multi-agent systems: A stochastic approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1233-1246.
    10. Jordehi, A. Rezaee, 2019. "Optimisation of demand response in electric power systems, a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 308-319.
    11. Chen, Yongbao & Chen, Zhe & Xu, Peng & Li, Weilin & Sha, Huajing & Yang, Zhiwei & Li, Guowen & Hu, Chonghe, 2019. "Quantification of electricity flexibility in demand response: Office building case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Damianakis, Nikolaos & Mouli, Gautham Ram Chandra & Bauer, Pavol & Yu, Yunhe, 2023. "Assessing the grid impact of Electric Vehicles, Heat Pumps & PV generation in Dutch LV distribution grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    13. Park, Sung-Won & Zhang, Zhong & Li, Furong & Son, Sung-Yong, 2021. "Peer-to-peer trading-based efficient flexibility securing mechanism to support distribution system stability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    14. Lazzari, Florencia & Mor, Gerard & Cipriano, Jordi & Solsona, Francesc & Chemisana, Daniel & Guericke, Daniela, 2023. "Optimizing planning and operation of renewable energy communities with genetic algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    15. Daniel Wuebben & Jens F. Peters, 2022. "Communicating the Values and Benefits of Home Solar Prosumerism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Wadim Strielkowski & Dalia Streimikiene & Alena Fomina & Elena Semenova, 2019. "Internet of Energy (IoE) and High-Renewables Electricity System Market Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Ma, Huan & Sun, Qinghan & Chen, Qun & Zhao, Tian & He, Kelun, 2023. "Exergy-based flexibility cost indicator and spatio-temporal coordination principle of distributed multi-energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    18. Vandermeulen, Annelies & Van Oevelen, Tijs & van der Heijde, Bram & Helsen, Lieve, 2020. "A simulation-based evaluation of substation models for network flexibility characterisation in district heating networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    19. Sourav Khanna & Victor Becerra & Adib Allahham & Damian Giaouris & Jamie M. Foster & Keiron Roberts & David Hutchinson & Jim Fawcett, 2020. "Demand Response Model Development for Smart Households Using Time of Use Tariffs and Optimal Control—The Isle of Wight Energy Autonomous Community Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    20. Luciano Cavalcante Siebert & Alexandre Rasi Aoki & Germano Lambert-Torres & Nelson Lambert-de-Andrade & Nikolaos G. Paterakis, 2020. "An Agent-Based Approach for the Planning of Distribution Grids as a Socio-Technical System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5468-:d:874158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.