IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i14p5062-d860450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Light Utility Vehicle Readiness in Military Transportation Systems Using Markov and Semi-Markov Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Mateusz Oszczypała

    (Institute of Mechanics and Computational Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, gen. Sylwestra Kaliskiego Street 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Jarosław Ziółkowski

    (Institute of Mechanics and Computational Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, gen. Sylwestra Kaliskiego Street 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Jerzy Małachowski

    (Institute of Mechanics and Computational Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, gen. Sylwestra Kaliskiego Street 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

This paper presents the issues of modeling the operation process of light utility vehicles operating in military transport systems. The required condition for the effective operation of the system is to maintain the means of transport at the appropriate level of technical readiness. For this purpose, it is necessary to equip the technical system with appropriate resources enabling the efficient implementation of fuel refilling, maintenance and repair processes. Each failure of the means of transport causes a significant reduction in transport capacity, which then results in the inability to perform the planned tasks. Quality control and vehicle operation process management require advanced mathematical methods and tools. Three indicators have been proposed as quantitative characteristics for assessing and optimizing the availability of military vehicles: functional readiness, technical efficiency and airworthiness. To determine their value, a stochastic exploitation model was developed based on the application of the theory of Markov processes. Based on the collected empirical data, a nine-state phase space of the studied process was identified. Operating states were distinguished relating to the implementation of the transport task, refueling, parking in the garage, as well as maintenance and repairs. As part of the considerations for the continuous time, verification of the distributions of time characteristics led to the development of a semi-Markov model. The ergodic probabilities calculated based on the conditional probability matrix of interstate transitions and the expected values of the time spent in the states were used to determine the indicators of functional availability, efficiency and technical suitability. In order to determine the possibility of optimizing the process, a sensitivity analysis was performed. Reducing the amount of time the vehicles must wait for repair by about 50% can improve the values of the indexes from 0.91 to 0.95.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateusz Oszczypała & Jarosław Ziółkowski & Jerzy Małachowski, 2022. "Analysis of Light Utility Vehicle Readiness in Military Transportation Systems Using Markov and Semi-Markov Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5062-:d:860450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5062/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5062/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jarosław Ziółkowski & Józef Żurek & Jerzy Małachowski & Mateusz Oszczypała & Joanna Szkutnik-Rogoż, 2022. "Method for Calculating the Required Number of Transport Vehicles Supplying Aviation Fuel to Aircraft during Combat Tasks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Liying Wang & Qing Yang & Yuran Tian, 2017. "Reliability Analysis of 6-Component Star Markov Repairable System with Spatial Dependence," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-7, February.
    3. Jacek Paś & Adam Rosiński & Michał Wiśnios & Marek Stawowy, 2022. "Assessing the Operation System of Fire Alarm Systems for Detection Line and Circuit Devices with Various Damage Intensities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Wang, Yanzhong & Xie, Bin & E, Shiyuan, 2022. "Adaptive relevance vector machine combined with Markov-chain-based importance sampling for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    5. Helene Seyr & Michael Muskulus, 2019. "Use of Markov Decision Processes in the Evaluation of Corrective Maintenance Scheduling Policies for Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Li Zhao & Kun Li & Wu Zhao & Han-Chen Ke & Zhen Wang, 2022. "A Sticky Sampling and Markov State Transition Matrix Based Driving Cycle Construction Method for EV," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    7. van Staden, Heletjé E. & Boute, Robert N., 2021. "The effect of multi-sensor data on condition-based maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 585-600.
    8. Shepero, Mahmoud & Munkhammar, Joakim, 2018. "Spatial Markov chain model for electric vehicle charging in cities using geographical information system (GIS) data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1089-1099.
    9. Iversen, Emil B. & Morales, Juan M. & Madsen, Henrik, 2014. "Optimal charging of an electric vehicle using a Markov decision process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-12.
    10. Wang, Jingjing & Miao, Yonghao, 2021. "Optimal preventive maintenance policy of the balanced system under the semi-Markov model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    11. Tadeusz Dziubak & Sebastian Dominik Dziubak, 2022. "A Study on the Effect of Inlet Air Pollution on the Engine Component Wear and Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-50, February.
    12. Muhammad Sharil Yahaya & Norhafiz Azis & Amran Mohd Selva & Mohd Zainal Abidin Ab Kadir & Jasronita Jasni & Emran Jawad Kadim & Mohd Hendra Hairi & Young Zaidey Yang Ghazali, 2018. "A Maintenance Cost Study of Transformers Based on Markov Model Utilizing Frequency of Transition Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Piotr Wróblewski & Wojciech Lewicki, 2021. "A Method of Analyzing the Residual Values of Low-Emission Vehicles Based on a Selected Expert Method Taking into Account Stochastic Operational Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.
    14. Li, Yan & Cui, Lirong & Lin, Cong, 2017. "Modeling and analysis for multi-state systems with discrete-time Markov regime-switching," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 41-49.
    15. Edward F. Brayer, 1957. "Calculating the Standard Error of a Proportion," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 6(1), pages 67-68, March.
    16. Kampitsis, Dimitris & Panagiotidou, Sofia, 2022. "A Bayesian condition-based maintenance and monitoring policy with variable sampling intervals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    17. El-Awady, Ahmed & Ponnambalam, Kumaraswamy, 2021. "Integration of simulation and Markov Chains to support Bayesian Networks for probabilistic failure analysis of complex systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mateusz Oszczypała & Jarosław Ziółkowski & Jerzy Małachowski, 2023. "Modelling the Operation Process of Light Utility Vehicles in Transport Systems Using Monte Carlo Simulation and Semi-Markov Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-31, February.
    2. Li, Xiaohui & Wang, Zhenpo & Zhang, Lei & Sun, Fengchun & Cui, Dingsong & Hecht, Christopher & Figgener, Jan & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2023. "Electric vehicle behavior modeling and applications in vehicle-grid integration: An overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    3. Natascia Andrenacci & Roberto Ragona & Antonino Genovese, 2020. "Evaluation of the Instantaneous Power Demand of an Electric Charging Station in an Urban Scenario," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Yagcitekin, Bunyamin & Uzunoglu, Mehmet, 2016. "A double-layer smart charging strategy of electric vehicles taking routing and charge scheduling into account," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 407-419.
    6. Jingrong Tan & Lin Chen, 2022. "Spatial Effect of Digital Economy on Particulate Matter 2.5 in the Process of Smart Cities: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Legros, Benjamin & Fransoo, Jan C., 2023. "Admission and pricing optimization of on-street parking with delivery bays," Other publications TiSEM 6d41ee5c-27dc-4d34-aff1-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Piotr Wróblewski & Mariusz Niekurzak, 2022. "Assessment of the Possibility of Using Various Types of Renewable Energy Sources Installations in Single-Family Buildings as Part of Saving Final Energy Consumption in Polish Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    9. Mariusz Niekurzak & Jerzy Mikulik, 2021. "Modeling of Energy Consumption and Reduction of Pollutant Emissions in a Walking Beam Furnace Using the Expert Method—Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Julia Vopava & Christian Koczwara & Anna Traupmann & Thomas Kienberger, 2019. "Investigating the Impact of E-Mobility on the Electrical Power Grid Using a Simplified Grid Modelling Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Luo, Changqi & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Keshtegar, Behrooz & Niu, Xiaopeng & Taylan, Osman, 2023. "An enhanced uniform simulation approach coupled with SVR for efficient structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    12. Kuang, Yanqing & Chen, Yang & Hu, Mengqi & Yang, Dong, 2017. "Influence analysis of driver behavior and building category on economic performance of electric vehicle to grid and building integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 427-437.
    13. Asadi, Amin & Nurre Pinkley, Sarah, 2021. "A stochastic scheduling, allocation, and inventory replenishment problem for battery swap stations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Ke Chen & Xian Zhao & Qingan Qiu, 2022. "Optimal Task Abort and Maintenance Policies Considering Time Redundancy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Kampitsis, Dimitris & Panagiotidou, Sofia, 2022. "A Bayesian condition-based maintenance and monitoring policy with variable sampling intervals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    16. García-Villalobos, J. & Zamora, I. & Knezović, K. & Marinelli, M., 2016. "Multi-objective optimization control of plug-in electric vehicles in low voltage distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 155-168.
    17. Milad Akbari & Morris Brenna & Michela Longo, 2018. "Optimal Locating of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations by Application of Genetic Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    18. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Rabcan, Jan, 2023. "A new method for analysis of Multi-State systems based on Multi-valued decision diagram under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    19. Schücking, Maximilian & Jochem, Patrick & Fichtner, Wolf & Wollersheim, Olaf & Stella, Kevin, 2017. "Charging strategies for economic operations of electric vehicles in commercial applications," MPRA Paper 91599, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Ahmed, Umair & Carpitella, Silvia & Certa, Antonella, 2021. "An integrated methodological approach for optimising complex systems subjected to predictive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5062-:d:860450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.