IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i9p2725-d551509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Directional Bending Performance of 4-Leg Jacket Substructure Supporting a 3MW Offshore Wind Turbine

Author

Listed:
  • Thanh-Tuan Tran

    (Institute of Offshore Wind Energy, Kunsan National University, 558 Daehak-ro, Gunsan-City 54150, Jeollabuk-do, Korea
    Faculty of Technology and Technique, Quy Nhon University, Binh Dinh 55100, Vietnam)

  • Sangkyun Kang

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kunsan National University, 558 Daehak-ro, Gunsan-City 54150, Jeollabuk-do, Korea)

  • Jang-Ho Lee

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kunsan National University, 558 Daehak-ro, Gunsan-City 54150, Jeollabuk-do, Korea)

  • Daeyong Lee

    (Institute of Offshore Wind Energy, Kunsan National University, 558 Daehak-ro, Gunsan-City 54150, Jeollabuk-do, Korea)

Abstract

A comprehensive investigation of the directional bending performance of a 4-leg jacket substructure, supporting a 3 MW offshore wind turbine, has been carried out in this study. The jacket substructure with a Pratt bracing system which is already installed in the southwest offshore wind farm in South Korea has been chosen as a reference support structure. A numerical model of the 3MW support structure (i.e., tower, transition piece, and jacket structure) is configured, and its structural performances are evaluated under the conditions of (1) extreme environmental loads (Env), (2) critical Design Load Cases (DLCs), and (3) a total of 288 combined load cases (CBs). For the case of Env (i.e., wind, wave, and current loads), loading directions varying from 0° to 360° at intervals of 15° are considered. The DLCs are provided from the 3 MW wind turbine manufacturer, in a 6 × 12 matrix format. The selected 4-leg jacket substructure in this study showed the smallest bending stiffness at the loading angles of 135° and 315° under the condition of Env, and at the loading angles between 105° and 150° under the CBs. From these results, critical bending directionality of the 4-leg jacket substructure is identified. This study also found that the effects of Env loads are not small compared to the total structural responses of the 4-leg jacket substructure which is supporting a 3 MW offshore wind turbine.

Suggested Citation

  • Thanh-Tuan Tran & Sangkyun Kang & Jang-Ho Lee & Daeyong Lee, 2021. "Directional Bending Performance of 4-Leg Jacket Substructure Supporting a 3MW Offshore Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2725-:d:551509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2725/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2725/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianhua Zhang & Won-Hee Kang & Ke Sun & Fushun Liu, 2019. "Reliability-Based Serviceability Limit State Design of a Jacket Substructure for an Offshore Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Kim, Dong Hyawn & Lee, Sang Geun, 2015. "Reliability analysis of offshore wind turbine support structures under extreme ocean environmental loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 161-166.
    3. Shi, Wei & Han, Jonghoon & Kim, Changwan & Lee, Daeyong & Shin, Hyunkyoung & Park, Hyunchul, 2015. "Feasibility study of offshore wind turbine substructures for southwest offshore wind farm project in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 406-413.
    4. Kim, Ji-Young & Oh, Ki-Yong & Kang, Keum-Seok & Lee, Jun-Shin, 2013. "Site selection of offshore wind farms around the Korean Peninsula through economic evaluation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 189-195.
    5. Tsung-Yueh Lin & Yi-Qing Zhao & Hsin-Haou Huang, 2020. "Representative Environmental Condition for Fatigue Analysis of Offshore Jacket Substructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Ko, Kyungnam & Kim, Kyoungbo & Huh, Jongchul, 2010. "Variations of wind speed in time on Jeju Island, Korea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3381-3387.
    7. Shi, Wei & Park, Hyunchul & Han, Jonghoon & Na, Sangkwon & Kim, Changwan, 2013. "A study on the effect of different modeling parameters on the dynamic response of a jacket-type offshore wind turbine in the Korean Southwest Sea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 50-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thanh-Tuan Tran & Sangkyun Kang & Daeyong Lee, 2022. "Improving Structural Safety of L-Type Flange Joint for Wind Towers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Chenyang Yuan & Yunfei Xie & Jing Li & Weifeng Bai & Haohao Li, 2022. "Influence of the Number of Ground Motions on Fragility Analysis of 5 MW Wind Turbines Subjected to Aerodynamic and Seismic Loads Interaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karimirad, Madjid & Michailides, Constantine, 2015. "V-shaped semisubmersible offshore wind turbine: An alternative concept for offshore wind technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 126-143.
    2. Mohammed H. Alsharif & Jeong Kim & Jin Hong Kim, 2018. "Opportunities and Challenges of Solar and Wind Energy in South Korea: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Lee, Yeon-Seung & Choi, Byung-Lyul & Lee, Ji Hyun & Kim, Soo Young & Han, Soonhung, 2014. "Reliability-based design optimization of monopile transition piece for offshore wind turbine system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 729-741.
    4. Oh, Ki-Yong & Nam, Woochul & Ryu, Moo Sung & Kim, Ji-Young & Epureanu, Bogdan I., 2018. "A review of foundations of offshore wind energy convertors: Current status and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 16-36.
    5. Seo, Junwon & Pokhrel, Jharna & Hu, Jong Wan, 2022. "Multi-Hazard Fragility Analysis of Offshore Wind Turbine Portfolios using Surrogate Models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    6. Sajid Ali & Choon-Man Jang, 2019. "Selection of Best-Suited Wind Turbines for New Wind Farm Sites Using Techno-Economic and GIS Analysis in South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Nam, Woochul & Oh, Ki-Yong & Epureanu, Bogdan I., 2019. "Evolution of the dynamic response and its effects on the serviceability of offshore wind turbines with stochastic loads and soil degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 151-163.
    9. Leimeister, Mareike & Kolios, Athanasios, 2018. "A review of reliability-based methods for risk analysis and their application in the offshore wind industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1065-1076.
    10. Li Zhou & Shifeng Ding & Ming Song & Junliang Gao & Wei Shi, 2019. "A Simulation of Non-Simultaneous Ice Crushing Force for Wind Turbine Towers with Large Slopes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Song, Yupeng & Basu, Biswajit & Zhang, Zili & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard & Li, Jie & Chen, Jianbing, 2021. "Dynamic reliability analysis of a floating offshore wind turbine under wind-wave joint excitations via probability density evolution method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 991-1014.
    12. Lima, Danielle K.S. & Leão, Ruth P.S. & dos Santos, Antônio C.S. & de Melo, Francisca D.C. & Couto, Vinícius M. & de Noronha, Aurélio W.T. & Oliveira, Demercil S., 2015. "Estimating the offshore wind resources of the State of Ceará in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 203-221.
    13. Kim, Choong-Ki & Jang, Seonju & Kim, Tae Yun, 2018. "Site selection for offshore wind farms in the southwest coast of South Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 151-162.
    14. Jijian Lian & Ou Cai & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Yue Zhao, 2019. "Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    15. Dongbum Kang & Kyungnam Ko & Jongchul Huh, 2018. "Comparative Study of Different Methods for Estimating Weibull Parameters: A Case Study on Jeju Island, South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Kang, Dongbum & Ko, Kyungnam & Huh, Jongchul, 2015. "Determination of extreme wind values using the Gumbel distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 51-58.
    17. El Alimi, Souheil & Maatallah, Taher & Dahmouni, Anouar Wajdi & Ben Nasrallah, Sassi, 2012. "Modeling and investigation of the wind resource in the gulf of Tunis, Tunisia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5466-5478.
    18. Shi, Wei & Han, Jonghoon & Kim, Changwan & Lee, Daeyong & Shin, Hyunkyoung & Park, Hyunchul, 2015. "Feasibility study of offshore wind turbine substructures for southwest offshore wind farm project in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 406-413.
    19. Gao, Jianwei & Guo, Fengjia & Ma, Zeyang & Huang, Xin & Li, Xiangzhen, 2020. "Multi-criteria group decision-making framework for offshore wind farm site selection based on the intuitionistic linguistic aggregation operators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    20. Sadik Kucuksari & Nuh Erdogan & Umit Cali, 2019. "Impact of Electrical Topology, Capacity Factor and Line Length on Economic Performance of Offshore Wind Investments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2725-:d:551509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.