IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i9p2405-d542001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Economical and Technical Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity Limits in Distribution Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Samar Fatima

    (Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Maarintie 8, 02150 Espoo, Finland)

  • Verner Püvi

    (Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Maarintie 8, 02150 Espoo, Finland)

  • Ammar Arshad

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute, Topi 23460, Pakistan)

  • Mahdi Pourakbari-Kasmaei

    (Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Maarintie 8, 02150 Espoo, Finland)

  • Matti Lehtonen

    (Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Maarintie 8, 02150 Espoo, Finland)

Abstract

Power distribution networks are transitioning from passive towards active networks considering the incorporation of distributed generation. Traditional energy networks require possible system upgrades due to the exponential growth of non-conventional energy resources. Thus, the cost concerns of the electric utilities regarding financial models of renewable energy sources (RES) call for the cost and benefit analysis of the networks prone to unprecedented RES integration. This paper provides an evaluation of photovoltaic (PV) hosting capacity (HC) subject to economical constraint by a probabilistic analysis based on Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to consider the stochastic nature of loads. The losses carry significance in terms of cost parameters, and this article focuses on HC investigation in terms of losses and their associated cost. The network losses followed a U-shaped trajectory with increasing PV penetration in the distribution network. In the investigated case networks, increased PV penetration reduced network costs up to around 40%, defined as a ratio to the feeding secondary transformer rating. Above 40%, the losses started to increase again and at 76–87% level, the network costs were the same as in the base cases of no PVs. This point was defined as the economical PV HC of the network. In the case of networks, this level of PV penetration did not yet lead to violations of network technical limits.

Suggested Citation

  • Samar Fatima & Verner Püvi & Ammar Arshad & Mahdi Pourakbari-Kasmaei & Matti Lehtonen, 2021. "Comparison of Economical and Technical Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity Limits in Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2405-:d:542001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2405/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2405/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verner Püvi & Robert J. Millar & Eero Saarijärvi & Ken Hayami & Tahitoa Arbelot & Matti Lehtonen, 2020. "Slime Mold Inspired Distribution Network Initial Solution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Ahmed Alzahrani & Hussain Alharthi & Muhammad Khalid, 2019. "Minimization of Power Losses through Optimal Battery Placement in a Distributed Network with High Penetration of Photovoltaics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Sarfati, M. & Hesamzadeh, M-R. & Holmberg, P., 2019. "Production efficiency of nodal and zonal pricing in imperfectly competitive electricity markets," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1919, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    4. Inês, Campos & Guilherme, Pontes Luz & Esther, Marín-González & Swantje, Gährs & Stephen, Hall & Lars, Holstenkamp, 2020. "Regulatory challenges and opportunities for collective renewable energy prosumers in the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Leuthold, Florian & Weigt, Hannes & von Hirschhausen, Christian, 2008. "Efficient pricing for European electricity networks - The theory of nodal pricing applied to feeding-in wind in Germany," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 284-291, December.
    6. Di Silvestre, Maria Luisa & Gallo, Pierluigi & Guerrero, Josep M. & Musca, Rossano & Riva Sanseverino, Eleonora & Sciumè, Giuseppe & Vásquez, Juan C. & Zizzo, Gaetano, 2020. "Blockchain for power systems: Current trends and future applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Gokturk Poyrazoglu, 2021. "Determination of Price Zones during Transition from Uniform to Zonal Electricity Market: A Case Study for Turkey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    8. Piotr F. Borowski, 2020. "Zonal and Nodal Models of Energy Market in European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Ammar Arshad & Martin Lindner & Matti Lehtonen, 2017. "An Analysis of Photo-Voltaic Hosting Capacity in Finnish Low Voltage Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Brown, Donal & Hall, Stephen & Davis, Mark E., 2019. "Prosumers in the post subsidy era: an exploration of new prosumer business models in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiago P. Abud & Andre A. Augusto & Marcio Z. Fortes & Renan S. Maciel & Bruno S. M. C. Borba, 2022. "State of the Art Monte Carlo Method Applied to Power System Analysis with Distributed Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Md Tariqul Islam & M. J. Hossain, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence for Hosting Capacity Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-33, February.
    3. Evangelos Bellos & Christos Tzivanidis, 2021. "Parametric Investigation of a Ground Source CO 2 Heat Pump for Space Heating," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr F. Borowski, 2020. "Zonal and Nodal Models of Energy Market in European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Botelho, D.F. & de Oliveira, L.W. & Dias, B.H. & Soares, T.A. & Moraes, C.A., 2022. "Prosumer integration into the Brazilian energy sector: An overview of innovative business models and regulatory challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Sommerfeldt, Nelson & Pearce, Joshua M., 2023. "Can grid-tied solar photovoltaics lead to residential heating electrification? A techno-economic case study in the midwestern U.S," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    4. Horstink, Lanka & Wittmayer, Julia M. & Ng, Kiat, 2021. "Pluralising the European energy landscape: Collective renewable energy prosumers and the EU's clean energy vision," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    5. Moein Shamoushaki & Pouriya H. Niknam & Lorenzo Talluri & Giampaolo Manfrida & Daniele Fiaschi, 2021. "Development of Cost Correlations for the Economic Assessment of Power Plant Equipment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Siripha Junlakarn & Phimsupha Kokchang & Kulyos Audomvongseree, 2022. "Drivers and Challenges of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Development in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Tobias Menzel & Timm Teubner, 2021. "How Regional Trust Cues Could Drive Decentralisation in the Energy Sector—An Exploratory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    8. F.G. Reis, Inês & Gonçalves, Ivo & A.R. Lopes, Marta & Henggeler Antunes, Carlos, 2021. "Business models for energy communities: A review of key issues and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Piotr F. Borowski, 2021. "Digitization, Digital Twins, Blockchain, and Industry 4.0 as Elements of Management Process in Enterprises in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Hansol Shin & Tae Hyun Kim & Kyuhyeong Kwag & Wook Kim, 2021. "A Comparative Study of Pricing Mechanisms to Reduce Side-Payments in the Electricity Market: A Case Study for South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Reis, Inês F.G. & Gonçalves, Ivo & Lopes, Marta A.R. & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler, 2022. "Towards inclusive community-based energy markets: A multiagent framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    12. Simshauser, Paul, 2024. "On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    13. Drago, Carlo & Gatto, Andrea, 2022. "Policy, regulation effectiveness, and sustainability in the energy sector: A worldwide interval-based composite indicator," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Lazzari, Florencia & Mor, Gerard & Cipriano, Jordi & Solsona, Francesc & Chemisana, Daniel & Guericke, Daniela, 2023. "Optimizing planning and operation of renewable energy communities with genetic algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    15. Qingle Pang & Lin Ye & Houlei Gao & Xinian Li & Yang Zheng & Chenbin He, 2021. "Penalty Electricity Price-Based Optimal Control for Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Julia Maria Wittmayer & Tessa de Geus & Bonno Pel & F. Avelino & Sabine Hielscher & Thomas Hoppe & Marie Susan Mühlemeier & Agata Stasik & Sem Oxenaar & Karoline K.S. Rogge & Vivian Visser & Esther Ma, 2020. "Beyond instrumentalism: Broadening the understanding of social innovation in socio-technical energy systems," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/312323, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    17. D'Adamo, Idiano & Mammetti, Marco & Ottaviani, Dario & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2023. "Photovoltaic systems and sustainable communities: New social models for ecological transition. The impact of incentive policies in profitability analyses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1291-1304.
    18. Li, Na & Okur, Özge, 2023. "Economic analysis of energy communities: Investment options and cost allocation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    19. Paul Simshauser & Farhad Billimoria & Craig Rogers, 2021. "Optimising VRE plant capacity in Renewable Energy Zones," Working Papers EPRG2121, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    20. Chun Xia-Bauer & Florin Vondung & Stefan Thomas & Raphael Moser, 2022. "Business Model Innovations for Renewable Energy Prosumer Development in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2405-:d:542001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.