IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i7p2028-d531126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Risk Assessment for Robustness Evaluation and Resilience Optimisation of Power Systems after Cascading Failures

Author

Listed:
  • Jesus Beyza

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Zaragoza, Maria de Luna 3, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Jose M. Yusta

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Zaragoza, Maria de Luna 3, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

Power systems face failures, attacks and natural disasters on a daily basis, making robustness and resilience an important topic. In an electrical network, robustness is a network’s ability to withstand and fully operate under the effects of failures, while resilience is the ability to rapidly recover from such disruptive events and adapt its structure to mitigate the impact of similar events in the future. This paper presents an integrated framework for jointly assessing these concepts using two complementary algorithms. The robustness model, which is based on a cascading failure algorithm, quantifies the degradation of the power network due to a cascading event, incorporating the circuit breaker protection mechanisms of the power lines. The resilience model is posed as a mixed-integer optimisation problem and uses the previous disintegration state to determine both the optimal dispatch and topology at each restoration stage. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework, the IEEE 118-bus test network is used as a case study. Analyses of the impact of variations in both generation and load are provided for 10 simulation scenarios to illustrate different network operating conditions. The results indicate that a network’s recovery could be related to the overload capacity of the power lines. In other words, a power system with high overload capacity can withstand higher operational stresses, which is related to increased robustness and a faster recovery process.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesus Beyza & Jose M. Yusta, 2021. "Integrated Risk Assessment for Robustness Evaluation and Resilience Optimisation of Power Systems after Cascading Failures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:2028-:d:531126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/2028/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/2028/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tapia, Tomás & Lorca, Álvaro & Olivares, Daniel & Negrete-Pincetic, Matías & Lamadrid L, Alberto J., 2021. "A robust decision-support method based on optimization and simulation for wildfire resilience in highly renewable power systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 723-733.
    2. Hossain, Eklas & Roy, Shidhartho & Mohammad, Naeem & Nawar, Nafiu & Dipta, Debopriya Roy, 2021. "Metrics and enhancement strategies for grid resilience and reliability during natural disasters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Plotnek, Jordan J. & Slay, Jill, 2021. "Power systems resilience: Definition and taxonomy with a view towards metrics," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    4. R. Cantelmi & G. Di Gravio & R. Patriarca, 2021. "Reviewing qualitative research approaches in the context of critical infrastructure resilience," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 341-376, September.
    5. Senkel, Anne & Bode, Carsten & Schmitz, Gerhard, 2021. "Quantification of the resilience of integrated energy systems using dynamic simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Mishra, Dillip Kumar & Ghadi, Mojtaba Jabbari & Azizivahed, Ali & Li, Li & Zhang, Jiangfeng, 2021. "A review on resilience studies in active distribution systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Yasser Almoghathawi & Andrés D. González & Kash Barker, 2021. "Exploring Recovery Strategies for Optimal Interdependent Infrastructure Network Resilience," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 229-260, March.
    8. Cheng, Yao & Elsayed, E.A. & Chen, Xi, 2021. "Random Multi Hazard Resilience Modeling of Engineered Systems and Critical Infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. Bier, Vicki M. & Gratz, Eli R. & Haphuriwat, Naraphorn J. & Magua, Wairimu & Wierzbicki, Kevin R., 2007. "Methodology for identifying near-optimal interdiction strategies for a power transmission system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(9), pages 1155-1161.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dariusz Gołȩbiewski & Tomasz Barszcz & Wioletta Skrodzka & Igor Wojnicki & Andrzej Bielecki, 2022. "A New Approach to Risk Management in the Power Industry Based on Systems Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Zongbei Shi & Honghai Zhang & Yike Li & Jinlun Zhou, 2023. "Air Traffic Sector Network: Motif Identification and Resilience Evaluation Based on Subgraphs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Beyza, Jesus & Yusta, Jose M., 2021. "The effects of the high penetration of renewable energies on the reliability and vulnerability of interconnected electric power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shang, Ce & Lin, Teng & Li, Canbing & Wang, Keyou & Ai, Qian, 2021. "Joining resilience and reliability evaluation against both weather and ageing causes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Dillip Kumar Mishra & Daria Złotecka & Li Li, 2022. "Significance of SMES Devices for Power System Frequency Regulation Scheme considering Distributed Energy Resources in a Deregulated Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-32, February.
    3. Wu, Chuantao & Wang, Tao & Zhou, Dezhi & Cao, Shankang & Sui, Quan & Lin, Xiangning & Li, Zhengtian & Wei, Fanrong, 2023. "A distributed restoration framework for distribution systems incorporating electric buses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    4. Ramadhani, Adhitya & Khan, Faisal & Colbourne, Bruce & Ahmed, Salim & Taleb-Berrouane, Mohammed, 2022. "Resilience assessment of offshore structures subjected to ice load considering complex dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Mansouri, Seyed Amir & Nematbakhsh, Emad & Ahmarinejad, Amir & Jordehi, Ahmad Rezaee & Javadi, Mohammad Sadegh & Marzband, Mousa, 2022. "A hierarchical scheduling framework for resilience enhancement of decentralized renewable-based microgrids considering proactive actions and mobile units," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Bier, Vicki & Gutfraind, Alexander, 2019. "Risk analysis beyond vulnerability and resilience – characterizing the defensibility of critical systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 626-636.
    7. Wu, Jiansong & Zhang, Linlin & Bai, Yiping & Reniers, Genserik, 2022. "A safety investment optimization model for power grid enterprises based on System Dynamics and Bayesian network theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Hao, Yucheng & Jia, Limin & Zio, Enrico & Wang, Yanhui & Small, Michael & Li, Man, 2023. "Improving resilience of high-speed train by optimizing repair strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    9. Liang, Zhenglin & Li, Yan-Fu, 2023. "Holistic Resilience and Reliability Measures for Cellular Telecommunication Networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    10. Federico Antonello & Piero Baraldi & Enrico Zio & Luigi Serio, 2022. "A Novel Metric to Evaluate the Association Rules for Identification of Functional Dependencies in Complex Technical Infrastructures," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 436-449, September.
    11. Sun, Qin & Li, Hongxu & Wang, Yuzhi & Zhang, Yingchao, 2022. "Multi-swarm-based cooperative reconfiguration model for resilient unmanned weapon system-of-systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Alain Aoun & Mehdi Adda & Adrian Ilinca & Mazen Ghandour & Hussein Ibrahim, 2024. "Centralized vs. Decentralized Electric Grid Resilience Analysis Using Leontief’s Input–Output Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Štěpán Kavan & Olga Dvořáčková & Jiří Pokorný & Lenka Brumarová, 2021. "Long-Term Power Outage and Preparedness of the Population of a Region in the Czech Republic—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    15. Azzolin, Alberto & Dueñas-Osorio, Leonardo & Cadini, Francesco & Zio, Enrico, 2018. "Electrical and topological drivers of the cascading failure dynamics in power transmission networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 196-206.
    16. Tomáš Fröhlich & Zdeněk Hon & Martin Staněk & Jiří Slabý, 2023. "Method of Identification and Assessment of Security Needs of a Region against the Threat of a Large Power Outage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Ulaa AlHaddad & Abdullah Basuhail & Maher Khemakhem & Fathy Elbouraey Eassa & Kamal Jambi, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Energy Grids: A Machine Learning-Based Ensemble Methods Approach for Outages Estimation in Extreme Weather Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Liu, Hanchen & Wang, Chong & Ju, Ping & Li, Hongyu, 2022. "A sequentially preventive model enhancing power system resilience against extreme-weather-triggered failures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    19. Yi‐Ping Fang & Giovanni Sansavini & Enrico Zio, 2019. "An Optimization‐Based Framework for the Identification of Vulnerabilities in Electric Power Grids Exposed to Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1949-1969, September.
    20. Zio, E. & Golea, L.R. & Rocco S., C.M., 2012. "Identifying groups of critical edges in a realistic electrical network by multi-objective genetic algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 172-177.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:2028-:d:531126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.