IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i1p189-d473623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic Analysis of Biomass Gasification Using Aspen Plus: Comparison of Stoichiometric and Non-Stoichiometric Models

Author

Listed:
  • María Pilar González-Vázquez

    (Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Carbono, INCAR-CSIC, Francisco Pintado Fe 26, 33011 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Fernando Rubiera

    (Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Carbono, INCAR-CSIC, Francisco Pintado Fe 26, 33011 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Covadonga Pevida

    (Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Carbono, INCAR-CSIC, Francisco Pintado Fe 26, 33011 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Daniel T. Pio

    (Department of Environment and Planning & Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Luís A.C. Tarelho

    (Department of Environment and Planning & Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

The gasification process involves several reactions that occur simultaneously and are interrelated by several independent variables. Simulation tools can help us to understand the process behaviour and predict the efficiency and final composition of the products. In this work, two thermodynamic equilibrium models developed in Aspen Plus ® software were assessed: a non-stoichiometric model based on the feedstock composition and on the most probable compounds expected from the results of the gasification process using minimisation of Gibbs free energy and a stoichiometric model based on a set of chemical reactions considered as the most relevant to describe the gasification process. Both models were validated with experimental data from a bubbling fluidised bed semi-pilot scale gasifier using pine kernel shells (PKS) as feedstock. The influence of temperature, stoichiometric ratio (SR) and steam to biomass ratio (SBR) were analysed. Overall, predictions of the gas composition and gasification efficiency parameters by the stoichiometric model showed better agreement to the experimental results. Our results point out the significance of an accurate description of the equilibrium composition of producer gas with the stoichiometric model for the gasification of biomass.

Suggested Citation

  • María Pilar González-Vázquez & Fernando Rubiera & Covadonga Pevida & Daniel T. Pio & Luís A.C. Tarelho, 2021. "Thermodynamic Analysis of Biomass Gasification Using Aspen Plus: Comparison of Stoichiometric and Non-Stoichiometric Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:189-:d:473623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/189/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/189/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Matos, M.A.A., 2017. "Characteristics of the gas produced during biomass direct gasification in an autothermal pilot-scale bubbling fluidized bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 915-928.
    2. Prins, Mark J. & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Janssen, Frans J.J.G., 2007. "From coal to biomass gasification: Comparison of thermodynamic efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1248-1259.
    3. Couto, Nuno Dinis & Silva, Valter Bruno & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel & Brito, Paulo, 2017. "An experimental and numerical study on the Miscanthus gasification by using a pilot scale gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 248-261.
    4. Shehzad, Areeb & Bashir, Mohammed J.K. & Sethupathi, Sumathi, 2016. "System analysis for synthesis gas (syngas) production in Pakistan from municipal solid waste gasification using a circulating fluidized bed gasifier," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1302-1311.
    5. Mauro Villarini & Vera Marcantonio & Andrea Colantoni & Enrico Bocci, 2019. "Sensitivity Analysis of Different Parameters on the Performance of a CHP Internal Combustion Engine System Fed by a Biomass Waste Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Sansaniwal, S.K. & Pal, K. & Rosen, M.A. & Tyagi, S.K., 2017. "Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 363-384.
    7. Motta, Ingrid Lopes & Miranda, Nahieh Toscano & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2018. "Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 998-1023.
    8. Ajaree Suwatthikul & Siripong Limprachaya & Paisan Kittisupakorn & Iqbal Mohammed Mujtaba, 2017. "Simulation of Steam Gasification in a Fluidized Bed Reactor with Energy Self-Sufficient Condition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Hafiz Muhammad Uzair Ayub & Sang Jin Park & Michael Binns, 2020. "Biomass to Syngas: Modified Non-Stoichiometric Thermodynamic Models for the Downdraft Biomass Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Hafiz Muhammad Uzair Ayub & Sang Jin Park & Michael Binns, 2020. "Biomass to Syngas: Modified Stoichiometric Thermodynamic Models for Downdraft Biomass Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1, October.
    11. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ismail, Tamer M. & Ramos, Ana & Abd El-Salam, M. & Brito, Paulo & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Experimental and modeling studies of Portuguese peach stone gasification on an autothermal bubbling fluidized bed pilot plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 862-877.
    12. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Khalili, Maryam & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2018. "Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 869-887.
    13. Widjaya, Elita R. & Chen, Guangnan & Bowtell, Les & Hills, Catherine, 2018. "Gasification of non-woody biomass: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 184-193.
    14. Puig-Arnavat, Maria & Bruno, Joan Carles & Coronas, Alberto, 2010. "Review and analysis of biomass gasification models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2841-2851, December.
    15. Pala, Laxmi Prasad Rao & Wang, Qi & Kolb, Gunther & Hessel, Volker, 2017. "Steam gasification of biomass with subsequent syngas adjustment using shift reaction for syngas production: An Aspen Plus model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 484-492.
    16. Vera Marcantonio & Enrico Bocci & Danilo Monarca, 2019. "Development of a Chemical Quasi-Equilibrium Model of Biomass Waste Gasification in a Fluidized-Bed Reactor by Using Aspen Plus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Parvez, A.M. & Mujtaba, I.M. & Wu, T., 2016. "Energy, exergy and environmental analyses of conventional, steam and CO2-enhanced rice straw gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 579-588.
    18. Kaushal, Priyanka & Tyagi, Rakesh, 2017. "Advanced simulation of biomass gasification in a fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 629-636.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rachele Foffi & Elisa Savuto & Matteo Stante & Roberta Mancini & Katia Gallucci, 2022. "Study of Energy Valorization of Disposable Masks via Thermochemical Processes: Devolatilization Tests and Simulation Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Andrzej Sitka & Wiesław Jodkowski & Piotr Szulc & Daniel Smykowski & Bogusław Szumiło, 2021. "Study of the Properties and Particulate Matter Content of the Gas from the Innovative Pilot-Scale Gasification Installation with Integrated Ceramic Filter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Vera Marcantonio & Luisa Di Paola & Marcello De Falco & Mauro Capocelli, 2023. "Modeling of Biomass Gasification: From Thermodynamics to Process Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-30, October.
    4. Pulla Rose Havilah & Amit Kumar Sharma & Gopalakrishnan Govindasamy & Leonidas Matsakas & Alok Patel, 2022. "Biomass Gasification in Downdraft Gasifiers: A Technical Review on Production, Up-Gradation and Application of Synthesis Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Dina Aboelela & Habibatallah Saleh & Attia M. Attia & Yasser Elhenawy & Thokozani Majozi & Mohamed Bassyouni, 2023. "Recent Advances in Biomass Pyrolysis Processes for Bioenergy Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-30, July.
    6. Yang Gao & Huaqing Xie & Zhenyu Yu & Mengxin Qin & Zhenguo Wu & Panlei Wang & Xi Zhao & Shiyi Zhang, 2023. "Two-Stage Dry Reforming Process for Biomass Gasification: Product Characteristics and Energy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Piotr Brożek & Ewelina Złoczowska & Marek Staude & Karolina Baszak & Mariusz Sosnowski & Katarzyna Bryll, 2022. "Study of the Combustion Process for Two Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) Streams Using Statistical Methods and Heat Recovery Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Alejandro López-Fernández & David Bolonio & Isabel Amez & Blanca Castells & Marcelo F. Ortega & María-Jesús García-Martínez, 2021. "Design and Pinch Analysis of a GFT Process for Production of Biojet Fuel from Biomass and Plastics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-31, September.
    9. Jacek Grams, 2022. "Upgrading of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Hydrogen-Rich Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-5, December.
    10. Kakati, Ujjiban & Sakhiya, Anil Kumar & Baghel, Paramjeet & Trada, Akshit & Mahapatra, Sadhan & Upadhyay, Darshit & Kaushal, Priyanka, 2022. "Sustainable utilization of bamboo through air-steam gasification in downdraft gasifier: Experimental and simulation approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    11. Gabriel Talero & Yasuki Kansha, 2022. "Simulation of the Steam Gasification of Japanese Waste Wood in an Indirectly Heated Downdraft Reactor Using PRO/II™: Numerical Comparison of Stoichiometric and Kinetic Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    2. M. Shahabuddin & Sankar Bhattacharya, 2021. "Co-Gasification Characteristics of Coal and Biomass Using CO 2 Reactant under Thermodynamic Equilibrium Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Sajid, Muhammad & Raheem, Abdul & Ullah, Naeem & Asim, Muhammad & Ur Rehman, Muhammad Saif & Ali, Nisar, 2022. "Gasification of municipal solid waste: Progress, challenges, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Aghaalikhani, Arash & Schmid, Johannes C. & Borello, Domenico & Fuchs, Joseph & Benedikt, Florian & Hofbauer, Herman & Rispoli, Franco & Henriksen, Ulrick B. & Sárossy, Zsuzsa & Cedola, Luca, 2019. "Detailed modelling of biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed gasifier with temperature variation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 703-718.
    5. Ajaree Suwatthikul & Siripong Limprachaya & Paisan Kittisupakorn & Iqbal Mohammed Mujtaba, 2017. "Simulation of Steam Gasification in a Fluidized Bed Reactor with Energy Self-Sufficient Condition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Safarian, Sahar & Unnþórsson, Rúnar & Richter, Christiaan, 2019. "A review of biomass gasification modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 378-391.
    7. Simona Di Fraia & M. Rakib Uddin, 2022. "Energy Recovery from Waste Paper and Deinking Sludge to Support the Demand of the Paper Industry: A Numerical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    9. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C., 2020. "Empirical and chemical equilibrium modelling for prediction of biomass gasification products in bubbling fluidized beds," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    11. Ghulamullah Maitlo & Imran Ali & Kashif Hussain Mangi & Safdar Ali & Hubdar Ali Maitlo & Imran Nazir Unar & Abdul Majeed Pirzada, 2022. "Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass for Syngas Production: Current Status and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-30, February.
    12. Vera Marcantonio & Michael Müller & Enrico Bocci, 2021. "A Review of Hot Gas Cleaning Techniques for Hydrogen Chloride Removal from Biomass-Derived Syngas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Khalili, Maryam & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2018. "Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 869-887.
    14. Ramos, Ana & Rouboa, Abel, 2020. "Syngas production strategies from biomass gasification: Numerical studies for operational conditions and quality indexes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1211-1221.
    15. Ibrahim, A. & Veremieiev, S. & Gaskell, P.H., 2022. "An advanced, comprehensive thermochemical equilibrium model of a downdraft biomass gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 912-925.
    16. Matheus Oliveira & Ana Ramos & Tamer M. Ismail & Eliseu Monteiro & Abel Rouboa, 2022. "A Review on Plasma Gasification of Solid Residues: Recent Advances and Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Donatella Barisano & Giuseppe Canneto & Francesco Nanna & Antonio Villone & Emanuele Fanelli & Cesare Freda & Massimiliano Grieco & Andrea Lotierzo & Giacinto Cornacchia & Giacobbe Braccio & Vera Marc, 2022. "Investigation of an Intensified Thermo-Chemical Experimental Set-Up for Hydrogen Production from Biomass: Gasification Process Integrated to a Portable Purification System—Part II," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ismail, Tamer M. & Ramos, Ana & Abd El-Salam, M. & Brito, Paulo & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Experimental and modeling studies of Portuguese peach stone gasification on an autothermal bubbling fluidized bed pilot plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 862-877.
    19. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    20. Vera Marcantonio & Enrico Bocci & Danilo Monarca, 2019. "Development of a Chemical Quasi-Equilibrium Model of Biomass Waste Gasification in a Fluidized-Bed Reactor by Using Aspen Plus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:189-:d:473623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.