IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v94y2016icp579-588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy, exergy and environmental analyses of conventional, steam and CO2-enhanced rice straw gasification

Author

Listed:
  • Parvez, A.M.
  • Mujtaba, I.M.
  • Wu, T.

Abstract

In this study, air, steam and CO2-enhanced gasification of rice straw was simulated using Aspen Plus™ and compared in terms of their energy, exergy and environmental impacts. It was found that the addition of CO2 had less impact on syngas yield compared with gasification temperature. At lower CO2/Biomass mass ratios (<0.25), CO2-enhanced gasification showed a lower GSE (gasification system efficiency) than conventional gasification, which was below 22.1%. However at higher CO2/Biomass ratios, CO2-enhanced gasification demonstrated higher GSE than conventional gasification. The GSE of CO2-enhanced gasification continued to increase to 58.8% when CO2/Biomass ratio was raised to 0.87. It was also found that chemical exergy was 2.05–4.85 times higher than physical exergy. The syngas exergy increased with CO2 addition, which was mainly due to the increase in physical exergy. The maximum exergy efficiency occurred in the temperature range of 800 °C–900 °C. For CO2-enhanced gasification, exergy efficiency was found to be more sensitive to temperature than CO2/Biomass ratios. In addition, the preliminary environmental analysis showed that CO2-enhanced gasification resulted in significant environmental benefits compared with steam gasification. However novel assessment methodologies are still needed to better evaluate the advantages of CO2 utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Parvez, A.M. & Mujtaba, I.M. & Wu, T., 2016. "Energy, exergy and environmental analyses of conventional, steam and CO2-enhanced rice straw gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 579-588.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:94:y:2016:i:c:p:579-588
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.11.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215015571
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2015.11.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pellegrini, Luiz Felipe & de Oliveira, Silvio, 2007. "Exergy analysis of sugarcane bagasse gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 314-327.
    2. van der Heijden, Harro & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2012. "Exergy analysis of thermochemical ethanol production via biomass gasification and catalytic synthesis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 200-210.
    3. Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Prins, Mark J. & Pierik, Anke, 2007. "Exergetic evaluation of biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 568-574.
    4. Zhang, Qinglin & Wu, Yueshi & Dor, Liran & Yang, Weihong & Blasiak, Wlodzimierz, 2013. "A thermodynamic analysis of solid waste gasification in the Plasma Gasification Melting process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 405-413.
    5. Rosen, Marc A. & Dincer, Ibrahim & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2008. "Role of exergy in increasing efficiency and sustainability and reducing environmental impact," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 128-137, January.
    6. Chaiwatanodom, Paphonwit & Vivanpatarakij, Supawat & Assabumrungrat, Suttichai, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification with CO2 recycle for synthesis gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 10-17.
    7. Prabowo, Bayu & Umeki, Kentaro & Yan, Mi & Nakamura, Masato R. & Castaldi, Marco J. & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2014. "CO2–steam mixture for direct and indirect gasification of rice straw in a downdraft gasifier: Laboratory-scale experiments and performance prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 670-679.
    8. Silalertruksa, Thapat & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Sagisaka, Masayuki & Yamaguchi, Katsunobu, 2013. "Life cycle GHG analysis of rice straw bio-DME production and application in Thailand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 560-567.
    9. Lv, Pengmei & Yuan, Zhenhong & Ma, Longlong & Wu, Chuangzhi & Chen, Yong & Zhu, Jingxu, 2007. "Hydrogen-rich gas production from biomass air and oxygen/steam gasification in a downdraft gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(13), pages 2173-2185.
    10. Saidur, R. & BoroumandJazi, G. & Mekhilef, S. & Mohammed, H.A., 2012. "A review on exergy analysis of biomass based fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1217-1222.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ajaree Suwatthikul & Siripong Limprachaya & Paisan Kittisupakorn & Iqbal Mohammed Mujtaba, 2017. "Simulation of Steam Gasification in a Fluidized Bed Reactor with Energy Self-Sufficient Condition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Detchusananard, Thanaphorn & Im-orb, Karittha & Maréchal, François & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2020. "Analysis of the sorption-enhanced chemical looping biomass gasification process: Performance assessment and optimization through design of experiment approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    3. Sahu, Pradeep & Vairakannu, Prabu, 2023. "CO2 based co-gasification of printed circuit board with high ash coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    4. Wang, Guangwei & Zhang, Jianliang & Zhang, Guohua & Ning, Xiaojun & Li, Xinyu & Liu, Zhengjian & Guo, Jian, 2017. "Experimental and kinetic studies on co-gasification of petroleum coke and biomass char blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 27-40.
    5. Siti Norliyana Harun & Marlia Mohd Hanafiah & Noorashikin Md Noor, 2022. "Rice Straw Utilisation for Bioenergy Production: A Brief Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    7. Catrini, P. & Cellura, M. & Guarino, F. & Panno, D. & Piacentino, A., 2018. "An integrated approach based on Life Cycle Assessment and Thermoeconomics: Application to a water-cooled chiller for an air conditioning plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 72-86.
    8. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    9. Wang, Linwei & Izaharuddin, Ainul N. & Karimi, Nader & Paul, Manosh C., 2021. "A numerical investigation of CO2 gasification of biomass particles- analysis of energy, exergy and entropy generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Fu, Z.H. & Xie, Y.L. & Li, W. & Lu, W.T. & Guo, H.C., 2017. "An inexact multi-objective programming model for an economy-energy-environment system under uncertainty: A case study of Urumqi, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 165-178.
    11. Shen, Ye & Li, Xian & Yao, Zhiyi & Cui, Xiaoqiang & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2019. "CO2 gasification of woody biomass: Experimental study from a lab-scale reactor to a small-scale autothermal gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 497-506.
    12. Sergey M. Frolov & Anton S. Silantiev & Ilias A. Sadykov & Viktor A. Smetanyuk & Fedor S. Frolov & Jaroslav K. Hasiak & Alexey B. Vorob’ev & Alexey V. Inozemtsev & Jaroslav O. Inozemtsev, 2023. "Gasification of Waste Machine Oil by the Ultra-Superheated Mixture of Steam and Carbon Dioxide," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    14. Yan, Beibei & Li, Songjiang & Cao, Xingsijin & Zhu, Xiaochao & Li, Jian & Zhou, Shengquan & Zhao, Juan & Sun, Yunan & Chen, Guanyi, 2023. "Flue gas torrefaction integrated with gasification based on the circulation of Mg-additive," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    15. María Pilar González-Vázquez & Fernando Rubiera & Covadonga Pevida & Daniel T. Pio & Luís A.C. Tarelho, 2021. "Thermodynamic Analysis of Biomass Gasification Using Aspen Plus: Comparison of Stoichiometric and Non-Stoichiometric Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Santhanam, S. & Schilt, C. & Turker, B. & Woudstra, T. & Aravind, P.V., 2016. "Thermodynamic modeling and evaluation of high efficiency heat pipe integrated biomass Gasifier–Solid Oxide Fuel Cells–Gas Turbine systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 751-764.
    17. Soreanu, G. & Tomaszewicz, M. & Fernandez-Lopez, M. & Valverde, J.L. & Zuwała, J. & Sanchez-Silva, L., 2017. "CO2 gasification process performance for energetic valorization of microalgae," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 37-43.
    18. Wang, Zhiwei & Burra, Kiran G. & Zhang, Mengju & Li, Xueqin & He, Xiaofeng & Lei, Tingzhou & Gupta, Ashwani K., 2020. "Syngas evolution and energy efficiency in CO2-assisted gasification of pine bark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    19. Chein, Rei-Yu & Hsu, Wen-Huai, 2020. "Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of H2-rich syngas production via sorption-enhanced chemical looping biomass gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 117-129.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Coronado, Christian J.R., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of biomass downdraft gasifier: Stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-201.
    2. Wang, Sheng & Bi, Xiaotao & Wang, Shudong, 2015. "Thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification for biomethane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1207-1218.
    3. Wang, Linwei & Izaharuddin, Ainul N. & Karimi, Nader & Paul, Manosh C., 2021. "A numerical investigation of CO2 gasification of biomass particles- analysis of energy, exergy and entropy generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Gassner, Martin & Maréchal, François, 2009. "Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1744-1753.
    5. Prabowo, Bayu & Aziz, Muhammad & Umeki, Kentaro & Susanto, Herri & Yan, Mi & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2015. "CO2-recycling biomass gasification system for highly efficient and carbon-negative power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 97-106.
    6. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Rovas, Dimitrios & Zabaniotou, Anastasia, 2015. "Exergy analysis of a small gasification-ICE integrated system for CHP production fueled with Mediterranean agro-food processing wastes: The SMARt-CHP," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 510-517.
    8. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari & Mousavi, Seyed Ali, 2019. "Evaluation of an optimal integrated design multi-fuel multi-product electrical power plant by energy and exergy analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 61-78.
    9. Elsner, Witold & Wysocki, Marian & Niegodajew, Paweł & Borecki, Roman, 2017. "Experimental and economic study of small-scale CHP installation equipped with downdraft gasifier and internal combustion engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 213-227.
    10. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2019. "Thermodynamic equilibrium model based on stoichiometric method for biomass gasification: A review of model modifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Greco, Gianluca & Di Stasi, Christian & Rego, Filipe & González, Belén & Manyà, Joan J., 2020. "Effects of slow-pyrolysis conditions on the products yields and properties and on exergy efficiency: A comprehensive assessment for wheat straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    12. Ojeda, Karina & Sánchez, Eduardo & Kafarov, Viatcheslav, 2011. "Sustainable ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass – Application of exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2119-2128.
    13. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    14. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Khalili, Maryam & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2018. "Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 869-887.
    15. Chein, Rei-Yu & Hsu, Wen-Huai, 2020. "Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of H2-rich syngas production via sorption-enhanced chemical looping biomass gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 117-129.
    16. Alvin Kiprono Bett & Saeid Jalilinasrabady, 2021. "Optimization of ORC Power Plants for Geothermal Application in Kenya by Combining Exergy and Pinch Point Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    17. AlNouss, Ahmed & McKay, Gordon & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2020. "Enhancing waste to hydrogen production through biomass feedstock blending: A techno-economic-environmental evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    18. Ahmed, A.M.A & Salmiaton, A. & Choong, T.S.Y & Wan Azlina, W.A.K.G., 2015. "Review of kinetic and equilibrium concepts for biomass tar modeling by using Aspen Plus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1623-1644.
    19. Im-orb, Karittha & Simasatitkul, Lida & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2016. "Techno-economic analysis of the biomass gasification and Fischer–Tropsch integrated process with off-gas recirculation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 483-496.
    20. L. Hay & A. H. B. Duffy & R. I. Whitfield, 2017. "The S‐Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 45-70, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:94:y:2016:i:c:p:579-588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.