IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i5p1054-d325743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-Stage Radial Turbine for a Small Waste Heat Recovery Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Ambra Giovannelli

    (Department of Engineering, University of Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale, 79, 00146 Rome, Italy)

  • Erika Maria Archilei

    (Department of Engineering, University of Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale, 79, 00146 Rome, Italy)

  • Coriolano Salvini

    (Department of Engineering, University of Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale, 79, 00146 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Looking at the waste heat potential made available by industry, it can be noted that there are many sectors where small scale (< 100 kWe) organic Rankine cycle (ORC) plants could be applied to improve the energy efficiency. Such plants are quite challenging from the techno-economic point of view: the temperature of the primary heat source poses a low cutoff to the system thermodynamic efficiency. Therefore, high-performance components are needed, but, at the same time, they have to be at low cost as possible to assure a reasonable payback time. In this paper, the design of a two-stage radial in-flow turbine for small ORC industrial plants is presented. Compared to commonly applied mono-stage expanders (both volumetric and dynamic), this novel turbine enables plants to exploit higher pressure ratios than conventional plants. Thus, the theoretical limit to the cycle efficiency is enhanced with undoubted benefits on the overall ORC plant performance. The design process involved 1D/2D models as well as 3D Computational Fluid Dynamic ones. After the design of the preliminary configuration, sensitivity analyses were carried out varying the most relevant geometric parameters for design performance improvement. Thereafter, the stages were both analyzed in off-design conditions giving their performance maps. Moreover, a stage stacking procedure was applied to obtain the overall turbine behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Ambra Giovannelli & Erika Maria Archilei & Coriolano Salvini, 2020. "Two-Stage Radial Turbine for a Small Waste Heat Recovery Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:1054-:d:325743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1054/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1054/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kang, Seok Hun, 2016. "Design and preliminary tests of ORC (organic Rankine cycle) with two-stage radial turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 142-154.
    2. Lorenzo Tocci & Tamas Pal & Ioannis Pesmazoglou & Benjamin Franchetti, 2017. "Small Scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A Techno-Economic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Kamyar Darvish & Mehdi A. Ehyaei & Farideh Atabi & Marc A. Rosen, 2015. "Selection of Optimum Working Fluid for Organic Rankine Cycles by Exergy and Exergy-Economic Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    5. Xinxin Zhang & Yin Zhang & Min Cao & Jingfu Wang & Yuting Wu & Chongfang Ma, 2019. "Working Fluid Selection for Organic Rankine Cycle Using Single-Screw Expander," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Roberto Capata & Gustavo Hernandez, 2014. "Preliminary Design and Simulation of a Turbo Expander for Small Rated Power Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-27, November.
    7. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    8. Fiaschi, Daniele & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Maraschiello, Francesco, 2015. "Design and performance prediction of radial ORC turboexpanders," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 517-532.
    9. Da Lio, Luca & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2016. "Predicting the optimum design of single stage axial expanders in ORC systems: Is there a single efficiency map for different working fluids?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 44-58.
    10. Costall, A.W. & Gonzalez Hernandez, A. & Newton, P.J. & Martinez-Botas, R.F., 2015. "Design methodology for radial turbo expanders in mobile organic Rankine cycle applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 729-743.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jung-Bo Sim & Se-Jin Yook & Young Won Kim, 2023. "Development of 180 kW Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) with a High-Efficiency Two-Stage Axial Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Surendran, Anandu & Seshadri, Satyanarayanan, 2022. "A novel transcritical-recuperative two-stage Organic Rankine Cycle for dual/multi-source heat recovery applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    3. Ningjian Peng & Enhua Wang & Hongguang Zhang, 2021. "Preliminary Design of an Axial-Flow Turbine for Small-Scale Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    2. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    3. Da Lio, Luca & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2017. "A mean-line model to predict the design efficiency of radial inflow turbines in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 187-209.
    4. Shao, Long & Ma, Xinling & Wei, Xinli & Hou, Zhonglan & Meng, Xiangrui, 2017. "Design and experimental study of a small-sized organic Rankine cycle system under various cooling conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 236-245.
    5. Enhua Wang & Ningjian Peng, 2023. "A Review on the Preliminary Design of Axial and Radial Turbines for Small-Scale Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Lorenzo Tocci & Tamas Pal & Ioannis Pesmazoglou & Benjamin Franchetti, 2017. "Small Scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A Techno-Economic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Al Jubori, Ayad M. & Al-Dadah, Raya K. & Mahmoud, Saad & Daabo, Ahmed, 2017. "Modelling and parametric analysis of small-scale axial and radial-outflow turbines for Organic Rankine Cycle applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 981-996.
    8. Xu, Weicong & Deng, Shuai & Su, Wen & Zhang, Ying & Zhao, Li & Yu, Zhixin, 2018. "How to approach Carnot cycle via zeotropic working fluid: Research methodology and case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 576-586.
    9. Xu, Weicong & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Zhang, Yue & Li, Shuangjun, 2019. "Performance analysis on novel thermodynamic cycle under the guidance of 3D construction method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 478-492.
    10. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    11. Martin T. White & Abdulnaser I. Sayma, 2018. "A Generalised Assessment of Working Fluids and Radial Turbines for Non-Recuperated Subcritical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Palagi, Laura & Sciubba, Enrico & Tocci, Lorenzo, 2019. "A neural network approach to the combined multi-objective optimization of the thermodynamic cycle and the radial inflow turbine for Organic Rankine cycle applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 210-226.
    13. Grelet, Vincent & Reiche, Thomas & Lemort, Vincent & Nadri, Madiha & Dufour, Pascal, 2016. "Transient performance evaluation of waste heat recovery rankine cycle based system for heavy duty trucks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 878-892.
    14. Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Bonamico, Eleonora, 2017. "Design guidelines for the choice between single and dual pressure layouts in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 413-431.
    15. Pacini, Leonardo & Ciappi, Lorenzo & Talluri, Lorenzo & Fiaschi, Daniele & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Smolka, Jacek, 2020. "Computational investigation of partial admission effects on the flow field of a tesla turbine for ORC applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    16. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    17. Sanjay Mukherjee & Abhishek Asthana & Martin Howarth & Jahedul Islam Chowdhury, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Waste Heat Recovery Technologies for the Food Processing Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Mounier, Violette & Olmedo, Luis Eric & Schiffmann, Jürg, 2018. "Small scale radial inflow turbine performance and pre-design maps for Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1072-1084.
    19. Landelle, Arnaud & Tauveron, Nicolas & Haberschill, Philippe & Revellin, Rémi & Colasson, Stéphane, 2017. "Organic Rankine cycle design and performance comparison based on experimental database," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1172-1187.
    20. Liang, Ting & Vecchi, Andrea & Knobloch, Kai & Sciacovelli, Adriano & Engelbrecht, Kurt & Li, Yongliang & Ding, Yulong, 2022. "Key components for Carnot Battery: Technology review, technical barriers and selection criteria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:1054-:d:325743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.