IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i2p330-d306965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Model for Environmental Assessment of the Comminution Process in the Chain of Biomass Energy Processing †

Author

Listed:
  • Weronika Kruszelnicka

    (Department of Technical Systems Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

Abstract

Acquiring energy contained in biomass requires its prior appropriate preparation. These treatments require some energy inputs, which significantly affect the reduction of the energy and the environmental balance in the entire life cycle of the biomass energy processing chain. In connection with the above, the aim of this work is to develop a methodology for the environmental assessment of biomass grinding in the processing chain for energy purposes. The research problem is formulated as follows: Is it possible to provide an assessment model that takes into account the environmental inputs and benefits of the grinding process of biomass intended for further energy use (for example, combustion)? How do the control variables of the grinding machine affect the environmental process evaluation? In response to these research problems, an original, carbon dioxide emission assessment index of the biomass grinding process was developed. The model was verified by assessing the process of rice and maize grinding on a real object—a five-disc mill—with various speed settings of the grinding disc. It was found that the carbon dioxide emission assessment model developed provides the possibility of comparing grinding processes and identifying the grinding process with a better CO 2 emission balance, where its values depend on the control parameters of the mill.

Suggested Citation

  • Weronika Kruszelnicka, 2020. "A New Model for Environmental Assessment of the Comminution Process in the Chain of Biomass Energy Processing †," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:330-:d:306965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/2/330/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/2/330/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gjalt Huppes & Masanobu Ishikawa, 2005. "Eco‐efficiency and Its xsTerminology," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(4), pages 43-46, October.
    2. Chandra, R. & Takeuchi, H. & Hasegawa, T., 2012. "Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: A review in context to second generation of biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1462-1476.
    3. Aguado, Roque & Cuevas, Manuel & Pérez-Villarejo, Luis & Martínez-Cartas, Ma Lourdes & Sánchez, Sebastián, 2020. "Upgrading almond-tree pruning as a biofuel via wet torrefaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 2091-2100.
    4. Pode, Ramchandra, 2016. "Potential applications of rice husk ash waste from rice husk biomass power plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1468-1485.
    5. Ware, Aidan & Power, Niamh, 2016. "Biogas from cattle slaughterhouse waste: Energy recovery towards an energy self-sufficient industry in Ireland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 541-549.
    6. Pierre-Luc Lizotte & Philippe Savoie & Alain De Champlain, 2015. "Ash Content and Calorific Energy of Corn Stover Components in Eastern Canada," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viktoria Mannheim & Weronika Kruszelnicka, 2022. "Energy-Model and Life Cycle-Model for Grinding Processes of Limestone Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Grzegorz Zając & Grzegorz Maj & Joanna Szyszlak-Bargłowicz & Tomasz Słowik & Paweł Krzaczek & Wojciech Gołębiowski & Marcin Dębowski, 2020. "Evaluation of the Properties and Usefulness of Ashes from the Corn Grain Drying Process Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Weronika Kruszelnicka & Robert Kasner & Patrycja Bałdowska-Witos & Józef Flizikowski & Andrzej Tomporowski, 2020. "The Integrated Energy Consumption Index for Energy Biomass Grinding Technology Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Liang Meng & Ahmed Alengebawy & Ping Ai & Keda Jin & Mengdi Chen & Yulong Pan, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Three Modes of Large-Scale Crop Residue Utilization Projects in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Marcin Zastempowski & Andrzej Bochat & Lubomír Hujo, 2021. "Selected Aspects of Modelling and Design Calculations of Roller Mills," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, March.
    6. Weronika Kruszelnicka & Jakub Hlosta & Jan Diviš & Łukasz Gierz, 2021. "Study of the Relationships between Multi-Hole, Multi-Disc Mill Performance Parameters and Comminution Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Djula Borozan, 2023. "Institutions and Environmentally Adjusted Efficiency," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4489-4510, December.
    2. Ezeilo, Uchenna R. & Wahab, Roswanira Abdul & Mahat, Naji Arafat, 2020. "Optimization studies on cellulase and xylanase production by Rhizopus oryzae UC2 using raw oil palm frond leaves as substrate under solid state fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1301-1312.
    3. Quintano, Claudio & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Rocca, Antonella, 2021. "Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Viktoria Mannheim & Weronika Kruszelnicka, 2022. "Energy-Model and Life Cycle-Model for Grinding Processes of Limestone Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Amal Hmaissia & Edgar Martín Hernández & Steve Boivin & Céline Vaneeckhaute, 2025. "Start-Up Strategies for Thermophilic Semi-Continuous Anaerobic Digesters: Assessing the Impact of Inoculum Source and Feed Variability on Efficient Waste-to-Energy Conversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Senghor, A. & Dioh, R.M.N. & Müller, C. & Youm, I., 2017. "Cereal crops for biogas production: A review of possible impact of elevated CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 548-554.
    7. Jenol, M.A. & Chu, P.H. & Ramle, I.K. & Joyce, L.J.W. & Lai-Yee, P. & Ibrahim, M.F. & Alitheen, N.B. & Osman, M.A. & Abd Gani, S. & Abd-Aziz, S., 2024. "Feasibility of agricultural biomass in Southeast Asia for enzymes production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    8. J. Van Meensel & A. Kanora & L. Lauwers & J. Jourquin & L. Goossens & G. Van Huylenbroeck, 2010. "From research to farm: ex ante evaluation of strategic deworming in pig finishing," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(10), pages 483-493.
    9. Du, Jing & Qian, Yuting & Xi, Yonglan & Lü, Xiwu, 2019. "Hydrothermal and alkaline thermal pretreatment at mild temperature in solid state for physicochemical properties and biogas production from anaerobic digestion of rice straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 261-267.
    10. Figge, Frank & Thorpe, Andrea Stevenson, 2023. "Circular economy, operational eco-efficiency, and sufficiency. An integrated view," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PB).
    11. Kostyniuk, Andrii & Likozar, Blaž, 2024. "Wet torrefaction of biomass waste into high quality hydrochar and value-added liquid products using different zeolite catalysts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    12. da Silva, Francinaldo Leite & de Oliveira Campos, Alan & dos Santos, Davi Alves & Batista Magalhães, Emilianny Rafaely & de Macedo, Gorete Ribeiro & dos Santos, Everaldo Silvino, 2018. "Valorization of an agroextractive residue—Carnauba straw—for the production of bioethanol by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 661-669.
    13. Jha, Gaurav & Soren, S., 2017. "Study on applicability of biomass in iron ore sintering process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 399-407.
    14. Massoud Sofi & Ylias Sabri & Zhiyuan Zhou & Priyan Mendis, 2019. "Transforming Municipal Solid Waste into Construction Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Shen, Yafei, 2017. "Rice husk silica derived nanomaterials for sustainable applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 453-466.
    16. Grzegorz Maj & Paweł Krzaczek & Wojciech Gołębiowski & Tomasz Słowik & Joanna Szyszlak-Bargłowicz & Grzegorz Zając, 2022. "Energy Consumption and Quality of Pellets Made of Waste from Corn Grain Drying Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    17. Tuni, Andrea & Rentizelas, Athanasios, 2019. "An innovative eco-intensity based method for assessing extended supply chain environmental sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 126-142.
    18. Kumari, Dolly & Singh, Radhika, 2018. "Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for biofuel production: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 877-891.
    19. Lindmark, Johan & Thorin, Eva & Bel Fdhila, Rebei & Dahlquist, Erik, 2014. "Effects of mixing on the result of anaerobic digestion: Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1030-1047.
    20. Daniel del Barrio Alvarez & Masahiro Sugiyama, 2020. "A SWOT Analysis of Utility-Scale Solar in Myanmar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:330-:d:306965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.