IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i24p6653-d463512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Border Electricity Trading in Southeast Europe Towards an Internal European Market

Author

Listed:
  • Despoina I. Makrygiorgou

    (Research, Technology & Development Department, Independent Power Transmission Operator (IPTO) S.A., 89 Dyrrachiou & Kifisou Str. Gr, 10443 Athens, Greece
    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece)

  • Nikos Andriopoulos

    (Research, Technology & Development Department, Independent Power Transmission Operator (IPTO) S.A., 89 Dyrrachiou & Kifisou Str. Gr, 10443 Athens, Greece
    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece)

  • Ioannis Georgantas

    (Research, Technology & Development Department, Independent Power Transmission Operator (IPTO) S.A., 89 Dyrrachiou & Kifisou Str. Gr, 10443 Athens, Greece)

  • Christos Dikaiakos

    (Research, Technology & Development Department, Independent Power Transmission Operator (IPTO) S.A., 89 Dyrrachiou & Kifisou Str. Gr, 10443 Athens, Greece)

  • George P. Papaioannou

    (Research, Technology & Development Department, Independent Power Transmission Operator (IPTO) S.A., 89 Dyrrachiou & Kifisou Str. Gr, 10443 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

The European Commission’s Target Model’s main objective is to integrate European electricity markets, leading to a single internal energy market and guaranteeing the instantaneous balance between electricity generation and demand. According to the target model for electricity trading, proposed by the European Network Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E), within each zone, electricity can be traded freely without taking into consideration network limitations. In contrast, for cross-border trading, the exchanges with other market areas are taken into account. Cross-border trade poses a further burden on the interconnection lines, resulting in increasing network congestion, which in turn restricts electricity trading. Thus, calculating the available capacity for trade has a significant ramification on the market. Today, the Available Transfer Capacity (ATC) mechanism dominates cross-border trading, but this methodology may be replaced by the Flow-Based (FB) approach across Europe. This paper investigates both approaches regarding the cross-border congestion management under the market coupling procedure. In our case study, the Southeast Europe (SEE) region is taken into consideration; it consists of both the FB and ATC approach in a five country (Greece, North Macedonia, Bulgaria, Serbia, and Romania) scenario. The purpose of our tests is to perform, compare, and evaluate the effectiveness of each method for the SEE region, while the main findings are the maximization of social welfare, better cross-border trading opportunities, and price convergence via the FB method.

Suggested Citation

  • Despoina I. Makrygiorgou & Nikos Andriopoulos & Ioannis Georgantas & Christos Dikaiakos & George P. Papaioannou, 2020. "Cross-Border Electricity Trading in Southeast Europe Towards an Internal European Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6653-:d:463512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6653/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6653/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George P. Papaioannou & Christos Dikaiakos & Christos Kaskouras & George Evangelidis & Fotios Georgakis, 2020. "Granger Causality Network Methods for Analyzing Cross-Border Electricity Trading between Greece, Italy, and Bulgaria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Christopher Kath, 2019. "Modeling Intraday Markets under the New Advances of the Cross-Border Intraday Project (XBID): Evidence from the German Intraday Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-35, November.
    3. Nikolaos Koltsaklis & Athanasios Dagoumas, 2018. "Policy Implications of Power Exchanges on Operational Scheduling: Evaluating EUPHEMIA’s Market Products in Case of Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Petr Spodniak & Mikael Collan & Mari Makkonen, 2017. "On Long-Term Transmission Rights in the Nordic Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Moritz Nobis & Carlo Schmitt & Ralf Schemm & Armin Schnettler, 2020. "Pan-European CVaR-Constrained Stochastic Unit Commitment in Day-Ahead and Intraday Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-35, May.
    6. Doorman, Gerard L. & van der Veen, Reinier, 2013. "An analysis of design options for markets for cross-border balancing of electricity," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 39-48.
    7. Newbery, David & Strbac, Goran & Viehoff, Ivan, 2016. "The benefits of integrating European electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 253-263.
    8. OGGIONI, Giorgia & SMEERS, Yves, 2013. "Market failures of market coupling and counter-trading in Europe: an illustrative model based discussion," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2553, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    9. Poplavskaya, Ksenia & Totschnig, Gerhard & Leimgruber, Fabian & Doorman, Gerard & Etienne, Gilles & de Vries, Laurens, 2020. "Integration of day-ahead market and redispatch to increase cross-border exchanges in the European electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    10. David Ritter & Roland Meyer & Matthias Koch & Markus Haller & Dierk Bauknecht & Christoph Heinemann, 2019. "Effects of a Delayed Expansion of Interconnector Capacities in a High RES-E European Electricity System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-32, August.
    11. Meeus, L. & Vandezande, L. & Cole, S. & Belmans, R., 2009. "Market coupling and the importance of price coordination between power exchanges," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 228-234.
    12. Piotr F. Borowski, 2020. "Zonal and Nodal Models of Energy Market in European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Maria Kannavou & Marilena Zampara & Pantelis Capros, 2019. "Modelling the EU Internal Electricity Market: The PRIMES-IEM Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-28, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Štefan Bojnec & Alan Križaj, 2021. "Electricity Markets during the Liberalization: The Case of a European Union Country," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Nenad Sijakovic & Aleksandar Terzic & Georgios Fotis & Ioannis Mentis & Magda Zafeiropoulou & Theodoros I. Maris & Emmanouil Zoulias & Charalambos Elias & Vladan Ristic & Vasiliki Vita, 2022. "Active System Management Approach for Flexibility Services to the Greek Transmission and Distribution System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-31, August.
    3. Jemma J. Makrygiorgou & Christos-Spyridon Karavas & Christos Dikaiakos & Ioannis P. Moraitis, 2023. "The Electricity Market in Greece: Current Status, Identified Challenges, and Arranged Reforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-40, February.
    4. Yue Pu & Yunting Li & Yingzi Wang, 2021. "Structure Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cross-Border Electricity Trade: A Complex Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christos Roumkos & Pandelis Biskas & Ilias Marneris, 2020. "Modeling Framework Simulating the TERRE Activation Optimization Function," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Brijs, Tom & De Jonghe, Cedric & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Belmans, Ronnie, 2017. "Interactions between the design of short-term electricity markets in the CWE region and power system flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 36-51.
    3. Štefan Bojnec & Alan Križaj, 2021. "Electricity Markets during the Liberalization: The Case of a European Union Country," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Christos Roumkos & Pandelis N. Biskas & Ilias G. Marneris, 2022. "Integration of European Electricity Balancing Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Fridgen, Gilbert & Keller, Robert & Thimmel, Markus & Wederhake, Lars, 2017. "Shifting load through space–The economics of spatial demand side management using distributed data centers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 400-413.
    6. Filippos Ioannidis & Kyriaki Kosmidou & Kostas Andriosopoulos & Antigoni Everkiadi, 2021. "Assessment of the Target Model Implementation in the Wholesale Electricity Market of Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    7. Ioannidis, Filippos & Kosmidou, Kyriaki & Makridou, Georgia & Andriosopoulos, Kostas, 2019. "Market design of an energy exchange: The case of Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Van den Bergh, Kenneth & Bruninx, Kenneth & Delarue, Erik, 2018. "Cross-border reserve markets: network constraints in cross-border reserve procurement," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 193-205.
    9. Zorana Božić & Dušan Dobromirov & Jovana Arsić & Mladen Radišić & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2020. "Power Exchange Prices: Comparison of Volatility in European Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Figueiredo, Nuno Carvalho & Silva, Patrícia Pereira da & Cerqueira, Pedro A., 2015. "Evaluating the market splitting determinants: evidence from the Iberian spot electricity prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 218-234.
    11. Ettore Bompard & Shaghayegh Zalzar & Tao Huang & Arturs Purvins & Marcelo Masera, 2018. "Baltic Power Systems’ Integration into the EU Market Coupling under Different Desynchronization Schemes: A Comparative Market Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Nikolaos Koltsaklis & Athanasios Dagoumas, 2018. "Policy Implications of Power Exchanges on Operational Scheduling: Evaluating EUPHEMIA’s Market Products in Case of Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    13. Unger, Elizabeth A. & Ulfarsson, Gudmundur F. & Gardarsson, Sigurdur M. & Matthiasson, Thorolfur, 2018. "The effect of wind energy production on cross-border electricity pricing: The case of western Denmark in the Nord Pool market," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 121-130.
    14. Ihlemann, Maren & van Stiphout, Arne & Poncelet, Kris & Delarue, Erik, 2022. "Benefits of regional coordination of balancing capacity markets in future European electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    15. Guo, Bowei & Newbery, David, 2021. "The cost of uncoupling GB interconnectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L. & Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Tsialis, Panagiotis & Ioannou, Konstantinos, 2018. "Electricity consumption and RES plants in Greece: Typologies of regional units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 134-144.
    17. Newbery, David M. & Greve, Thomas, 2017. "The strategic robustness of oligopoly electricity market models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 124-132.
    18. Bowei Guo & Giorgio Castagneto Gissey, 2019. "Cost Pass-through in the British Wholesale Electricity Market: Implications of Brexit and the ETS reform," Working Papers EPRG1937, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    19. Ahmadi, Seyed Ehsan & Sadeghi, Delnia & Marzband, Mousa & Abusorrah, Abdullah & Sedraoui, Khaled, 2022. "Decentralized bi-level stochastic optimization approach for multi-agent multi-energy networked micro-grids with multi-energy storage technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    20. Bucksteeg, Michael & Voswinkel, Simon & Blumberg, Gerald, 2023. "Improving flow-based market coupling by integrating redispatch potential - Evidence from a large-scale model," EconStor Preprints 270878, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6653-:d:463512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.